Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-2024, 02:44 PM   #1
David in San Antonio
Senior Member
 
David in San Antonio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 546
Default Is cam regrinding purely subtractive?

I searched past threads but couldn’t find the answer:
I was told that when a Model A cam is reground it is purely a subtractive process. That is, the lobes are not first built up with additional metal prior to grinding. This sounds like the reground cam could have a different shape but at no point could its diameter exceed that of the original.

Q1. Is that true that regrinding an A cam is purely subtractive?
If so, is this true for other engines?

Q2. If they are not built up, isn’t there potential for the lift height to be diminished? I presume the lift height generally isn’t increased or the valve could strike the head, especially if it’s a higher compression design. But don’t we want to at least maintain the original lift?

Q3. If not built up wouldn’t this limit the duration the valve is open? I’m picturing a pointy lobe with steep ramps vs a more rounded, wider nose, holding the valve open longer.

Thanks for helping me understand.
__________________
David in San Antonio
Late ‘30 Deluxe "Wretched Roadster"
Alamo A’s Club
David in San Antonio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2024, 03:09 PM   #2
alexiskai
Senior Member
 
alexiskai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Mebane NC
Posts: 2,849
Default Re: Is cam regrinding purely subtractive?

You can counteract the decreased height of the cam lobes by lengthening the valve+tappet linkage. The cam grinder will tell you the correct lash to set.
alexiskai is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-02-2024, 03:20 PM   #3
Kurt in NJ
Senior Member
 
Kurt in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,556
Default Re: Is cam regrinding purely subtractive?

everywhere is made smaller and won’t be quite the same as originally made
Kurt in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2024, 03:23 PM   #4
alexiskai
Senior Member
 
alexiskai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Mebane NC
Posts: 2,849
Default Re: Is cam regrinding purely subtractive?

Another way to explain this is, let’s say you had a stock cam, and you wanted to keep the valve open longer. You take out the cam, grind the top of each lobe to be less pointy, and put it back in. This doesn’t get what you want, because the valve and tappet now sit lower overall. Aha, you think, I’ll adjust my tappet to be longer. Now you get the behavior you want - the valve rises earlier and lowers later - but you’ve altered the valve lash, so now there’s not enough clearance when the valve is at the bottom of its travel. So now you have to take the cam out and grind material off the round portion of each lobe to bring the lash back to the correct amount.

So you see, regrinding a cam involves reshaping each lobe to be slightly smaller all the way around. You then re-adjust the length of each tappet to get the correct clearance again - which might be different than the stock cam clearance.
alexiskai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2024, 11:43 PM   #5
Herb Concord Ca
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Concord CA
Posts: 755
Default Re: Is cam regrinding purely subtractive?

I'm sure Jim Bireley (sp)? knows the answers.
Herb Concord Ca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2024, 10:02 AM   #6
Fullraceflathead
Senior Member
 
Fullraceflathead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Chillicothe, Missouri
Posts: 1,684
Default Re: Is cam regrinding purely subtractive?

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
They also grind what is known as the base circle that gives you the increased lift but you can only grind down so much before you would have to build it up!!!
__________________
"If I asked people what they wanted they would have said faster horses."
-Henry Ford

"Primitive technology is not a design flaw"


1928 Ford Model A Roadster Pickup
1930 Gordon Smith Air Compressor
1941 Willy's Pickup
1960 Thunderbird-For Sale
1964 Buick Riviera 2x4 425
1965 Pontiac GTO, 455 Super Duty
2004 Dodge Ram SRT-10, V-10 Viper
1977 Charger Jet Boat,460 Ford,Jacuzzi Jet
Front Engine Nostalgia Dragster,Supercharged 296 "Fullrace Flathead" Ford
Engine Build up on DVD ask
Fullraceflathead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2024, 01:37 PM   #7
Jim Brierley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,251
Default Re: Is cam regrinding purely subtractive?

To regrind any cam, it is mounted in the grinder "on centers". Look at each end of all cams and you will find shallow holes, these are exactly in the center of the bearings diameter-wise. The grinder is similar to a crankshaft grinder, only a 'master' lobe is mounted on one end with a follower so the grinding wheel moves in and out as the cam rotates. The grinding wheel can be moved along the cam so it can reach each lobe. There is a special chuck that the cam is mounted in, it is rotated to properly align with the lobe. That chuck can be set for 4,6, or 8 cylinder cars, it can also be rotated by degrees to properly align with a lobe, this is done on the first lobe to be ground, then the chuck is rotated for the number of lobes (cylinders of the car). Metal is then ground to match the master. For a performance grind more metal is ground off the heel of the cam but very little off the nose. If that cam is now inserted in the engine you will have to adjust (lengthen) the lifter to the proper gap. So the lifter is now closer to the center of the cam, but the nose is farther away, so the lift is greater. The master lobe is 4" or 5" in diameter, depending on what company made the machine, this insures the cam lobe will be exactly as you want it to be. I hope this is understandable?

Last edited by Jim Brierley; 12-05-2024 at 01:39 PM. Reason: added info
Jim Brierley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2024, 09:27 PM   #8
ModelA29
Senior Member
 
ModelA29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,152
Default Re: Is cam regrinding purely subtractive?

This is a Winfield 1R grind. You can see how the heel has been cut down to increase lift.

Duration 266 Lift .350 Winfield 1R grind - fast action, decent idle
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cam stripe.jpg (35.0 KB, 12 views)
ModelA29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2024, 10:20 PM   #9
johnneilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: 34.22 N 118.36 W
Posts: 1,181
Default Re: Is cam regrinding purely subtractive?

So, to the OP questions,
Yes, grinding is a subtractive process. The typical cam regrind will leave the lobe smaller.
As Jim has mentioned, if you remove from the base circle it will increase the lift of the lobe.
Welding is an option to build up the lobe surface to increase the duration of the cam and grinding/blending the lobe to final shape/profile.
I made cam blanks for racing as shown in the picture to allow for changing the lobes layout for different crank firing order and also reverse porting the motor.
These also allowed for the block to be bored out and use a larger cam diameter, this gave .500 lift and did not back cut the base circle.

John
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0511.JPG (187.2 KB, 33 views)
__________________
As Carroll Smith wrote; All Failures are Human in Origin.
johnneilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2024, 10:28 AM   #10
Fullraceflathead
Senior Member
 
Fullraceflathead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Chillicothe, Missouri
Posts: 1,684
Default Re: Is cam regrinding purely subtractive?

Very nice cam blanks!!!
__________________
"If I asked people what they wanted they would have said faster horses."
-Henry Ford

"Primitive technology is not a design flaw"


1928 Ford Model A Roadster Pickup
1930 Gordon Smith Air Compressor
1941 Willy's Pickup
1960 Thunderbird-For Sale
1964 Buick Riviera 2x4 425
1965 Pontiac GTO, 455 Super Duty
2004 Dodge Ram SRT-10, V-10 Viper
1977 Charger Jet Boat,460 Ford,Jacuzzi Jet
Front Engine Nostalgia Dragster,Supercharged 296 "Fullrace Flathead" Ford
Engine Build up on DVD ask
Fullraceflathead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2024, 10:31 AM   #11
Fullraceflathead
Senior Member
 
Fullraceflathead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Chillicothe, Missouri
Posts: 1,684
Default Re: Is cam regrinding purely subtractive?

When the legendary Ed Iskenderian made the famous 404 radius lifter camshaft with.404 lift for the flathead V8. That was about the most lift you could get without making the base circle so small that the cam would flex and break and still fit the current bearing size of the flathead V8. Then later he made a 505 radius lifter cam with .505 lift. The way he was able to fit this larger lobe in the block was to run it without the cam bearings just like a model A cam runs!!!
I run the 404 radius lifter cam in my 296 Flathead V8 Nostalgia dragster in my avatar.
Ed “Isky” Iskenderian is I believe the last of the living Hot Rod Pioneers and Innovators and is currently 103 years old!!!
Yes I know I strayed off Model A’s.
__________________
"If I asked people what they wanted they would have said faster horses."
-Henry Ford

"Primitive technology is not a design flaw"


1928 Ford Model A Roadster Pickup
1930 Gordon Smith Air Compressor
1941 Willy's Pickup
1960 Thunderbird-For Sale
1964 Buick Riviera 2x4 425
1965 Pontiac GTO, 455 Super Duty
2004 Dodge Ram SRT-10, V-10 Viper
1977 Charger Jet Boat,460 Ford,Jacuzzi Jet
Front Engine Nostalgia Dragster,Supercharged 296 "Fullrace Flathead" Ford
Engine Build up on DVD ask

Last edited by Fullraceflathead; 12-06-2024 at 10:42 AM.
Fullraceflathead is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.