|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 19
|
![]()
I hope you can advise me. Reading a lot but not sure yet.
I have a '31 Speedster and want a carburetor upgrade. The engine has some modifications. Head is 7 to 1 and a 340 camshaft. still with standard valves, but they are being modified to 1.73" Intake valves and 1.53" Exhaust valves. What's your idea for carburetor? Currently a standard Tillitson. Could go for a double Tillotson. A single Stromerg 81 or double. A single Stromberg 97 or double. Or perhaps a single or double Holley 94? And why? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 1,617
|
![]()
Get Jim Brierly's book if you do not have it already. It's full of performance info.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 889
|
![]()
The Holley 94 is a pretty good carbuerator. Some say better than a Stromberg. I have a Stromberg 48 on my model B motor and a 94 on my V8. The bad reputation of the Holley 94 comes largely from the fact that they were used to (vacuum) control the distributor advance in a vacuum advance ONLY distributor. This was Ford’s Load-A-Matic system and I have a strong dislike for that set up. It works ok if EVERYThing is stock and in good condition. This is rarely the case. The 94 can be used with a conventional centrifical or centrifical + vacuum advance distributor.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 889
|
![]()
“Ol’ Ron” on here has written an outstanding book as well called “Nostalgia”. He wrote it 20 years ago so some things have changed a bit but it’s still great (I have a copy).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 5,854
|
![]()
My downdraft Weber works great on my engine. It has two throats with progressive linkage. So for lower power requirements, the one throat provides good economy and when extra power is needed, the second throat opens up. You can really feel the difference when the second throat opens up.
__________________
A is for apple, green as the sky. Step on the gas, for tomorrow I die. Forget the brakes, they really don't work. The clutch always sticks, and starts with a jerk. My car grows red hair, and flies through the air. Driving's a blast, a blast from the past. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 889
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 889
|
![]()
I imagine it depends on how many modifications have been done to the motor and how much horsepower is trying to be produced. The 32/36 is rated 270 CFM. The at 3,000 RPM a 200 CI motor needs 175 CFM so I would say that a Weber clearly has enough capacity, good to know.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 889
|
![]()
Per the formula in Ron Holleran’s (‘Ol Ron/Gramps) book “Nostalgia” CID X RPM/3456
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,251
|
![]()
Contact me at [email protected] and I'll send you an article that I did on some dyno work about carbs.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lynden, Wa
Posts: 3,777
|
![]()
I use a Marvel in my 1930 Townsedan, the engine has been upgraded with a 'high' comp head and Counter balanced crank and shaved flywheel. That heavy cars does 55-55 al day long.
__________________
1930 TownSedan (Briggs) 1957 Country Sedan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|