The Ford Barn

The Ford Barn (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/index.php)
-   Model A (1928-31) (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Why the insert fabric roof and not steel (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=75050)

1931 flamingo 06-25-2012 05:04 PM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

I've also heard the same as post # 18 and #20. FWIW
Paul in CT

rodnut1 06-26-2012 07:58 PM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

The body design did not allow for a full metal roof- perimeter skins over a hardwood frame, with the fabric top insert installed last, was definately the easiest method of closing the top. Steel roofs didn't appear until the technology was developed to stamp and assemble the body by welding, instead of using nails..

Deluxe Delivery 06-27-2012 08:02 AM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

I too have heard that the technology, or the tools available at the time could not produce the width of the panel necessary to make a roof. Yet the side panel of a 130 B, the Deluxe Delivery was one piece and more than big enough to cover a roof. All posts give insight into this often asked question. ( right after they ask...are those fenders black ?!!!)

WTSHNN 06-27-2012 09:12 AM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

I have often doubted the argument that cited limitations of era production methods or the "couldn't produce something that size."

http://www.oocities.org/the_new_ford..._etancelin.jpg

http://www.oocities.org/the_new_ford...a_panel_bw.jpg

http://www.oocities.org/the_new_ford...ing_carpet.jpg

http://www.oocities.org/the_new_ford...ard_brands.jpg

It would appear to me that if they were able to make a side panel large enough for a AA truck, they could make a roof for a coupe, tudor, even a fordor....

-Tim

mot 06-27-2012 09:53 AM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

isnt the passenger compartment roof on a town car delivery solid?

1930artdeco 06-27-2012 10:18 AM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

I unsderstand the complexity of the compound curves being a good answer as they have to have one stamping and then fold it to make the sides. I personally think that it was more they were still doing things the 'coach' way. As for not being able to roll steel that wide I disagree for two reasons: WTSHNN's post of AA sides, and the fact that they could roll Aluminum for aircraft and boiler plate for ships and boilers. Just my two cents worth.

Mike

Deluxe Delivery 06-27-2012 10:43 AM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

I believe the town car delivery body was aluminum....not that that would make much difference in the size of the molds.

Cool Hand Lurker 06-27-2012 10:46 AM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

I think the best explanation is that is the way they did it in those days. There are a lot of guys that use the old saying "this is the way we have always done it" but if you have done it wrong for 40 years it doesn't make it right. Evolution fights Subborness and in this case Evolution won out.

WTSHNN 06-27-2012 11:18 AM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

Just to add more to the rumor mill; I remember hearing it had to do with concerns about attracting and then retaining heat inside the vehicle.

-Tim

MrTube 06-27-2012 12:19 PM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTSHNN (Post 450987)
Just to add more to the rumor mill; I remember hearing it had to do with concerns about attracting and then retaining heat inside the vehicle.

-Tim


Oh, I believe this one.
I mean just look at the detail and engineering Ford put into keeping heat from the muffler and exhaust system out of the passenger compartment.

:p

woodypecker 06-29-2012 07:13 PM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

During the time the cars were manufactured it was easier to control body boom noise. A severe boom is when you have one window open in a new car and you get the boom boom sound. the fabric flexes and reduces noise.

coop39 01-01-2013 10:39 PM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

i know this is an old thread but i thought id ask the question
i have a 1933 vicky with a full steel top and the bloke i bought it from had a 30 tudor with the same.these were from south america and he said they were factory fitted tops.can anyone clarify this.both cars do look factory because nothing else has been touched on them.

Mike V. Florida 01-02-2013 08:11 AM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by coop39 (Post 563774)
i know this is an old thread but i thought id ask the question
i have a 1933 vicky with a full steel top and the bloke i bought it from had a 30 tudor with the same.these were from south america and he said they were factory fitted tops.can anyone clarify this.both cars do look factory because nothing else has been touched on them.


As you have read above it was not factory.

spdway1 01-02-2013 08:02 PM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marco Tahtaras (Post 449307)
Besides the steel stamping issues already noted, it was the standard in the industry for the time period. If you spent 17k on a new Springfield built Rolls Royce you would get the same thing except the roof covering was long grain GENUINE leather.

What is left to the Springfield, MA Rolls Royce factory is about 2 miles from me! The Indian Motorcycle Factory and the Springfield Armory are still standing and well!!! The Basketball Hall of Fame and the Dr. Suess Building are new! And the FIRST Durea was built here too!

Kevin in NJ 01-03-2013 07:10 AM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

Something else to consider.

Did you ever think about how Ford spent a lot of time and money to switch over to the slant window all steel bodies for just about 9 months of production?

I believe the major reason was the steel body was much less labor intensive (=cheaper to build). So much so that they thought it worth while to do a major change for a reasonably short period of time. I believe that if they could have eliminated the labor of the wood roof they would have done it. There must have been a manufacturing or a life cycle reason why they never did it.

I will go a step further. The change to the turret top happened after they went to very rounded top. That would be much more structurally rigid and not likely to warp and tear seams like you would expect with a flat roof.

I do not know the reason, but those are my guesses.

Doug in NJ 01-03-2013 09:31 AM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

After replacing the wood, fabric, and moldings on my S/W roof, I was amazed how complicated and fiddly the process was. Especially for such a delicate part of the car that might have to be replaced more than once!
I saw a description of the roof of another early 30's car (Oldsmobile?), and I was surprised by how much simpler (and more leak-resistant) it was. The fabric was stretched around an inner wooden frame, sort of like an unfinished artist's canvas, and the assembly was set into the roof opening, and caulking was applied to the joint. It seems like this would be easier to repair, and the fixed wood inside the car body would not get messed up from all those tacks (for both the fabric and the molding) getting repeatedly removed and replaced.

Doug

Rowdy 01-03-2013 09:44 AM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

I actually thought it was to keep afew more people employed during the depression than anything else. Ford understood what our modern business men do not, Less Unemployment= More Sales. Rod

Tom Wesenberg 01-03-2013 10:00 AM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rowdy (Post 564622)
I actually thought it was to keep afew more people employed during the depression than anything else. Ford understood what our modern business men do not, Less Unemployment= More Sales. Rod

Now, that's a slant I'd never thought about, but it makes sense, and could certainly be one of the reasons.

Rowdy 01-03-2013 10:17 AM

Re: Why the insert fabric roof and not steel
 

Tom, I had heard that one reason for so much wood still in the A bodies was to keep the lumberjacks and wood workers employed in the forests and shops Henrey owned. Ford had already proved in 1926 that he could produce a body with far less wood than what the A's have. Also I find it interesting to note there are far more 28-29 bodies and cars to be found in this area than 30-31's dispite higher production of 30-31 cars overall. This area was hard hit (still not as bad as areas to the South and West of here) by the dustbowl problems and the depression in general. Manufacturing centers like Detroit seemed to recover alittle faster and have a much higher volme of 30-31 body styles in the general area. Interesting this affect can still be observed to this day. Rod


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.