|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-23-2021, 01:43 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
1932 clutch issue
Hi. I changed my 11’’ clutch to a 10.
On the new one, I don’t have the adjusters. So now, I have to much play in the pedal. The release bearing has a longer travel to push the pressure plate. Except the fact I have to make a longer pushrod, is there a risk for the bearing guide or something else ? French flathead, 1939 trans, original chassis and pedal assy. Thanks |
11-23-2021, 09:47 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: CLAYTON DE
Posts: 1,282
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
I apologize for not having the answer.
I would rather find the guy who rebuilds them, and keep the older one. Your location may make it difficult, but somebody there ( thinking region ) must be capable.
__________________
Enjoy yer day. Tom Hate can't fix what it started. |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
11-23-2021, 10:02 AM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Quote:
the « old » one is almost new, when the engine was rebuilt. Engine come from a french truck. I red some advice on the H.A.M.B. it is highly recommended to change the 11 to a 10’’. That’s what I did.Drilled, threaded and balanced the flywheel with the new pressure plate. I can’t figure put the 11 back on. |
|
11-23-2021, 10:29 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,303
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Will a 10" even fit in a '32 transmission. I'm no expert, but isn't a 9" as large as you can go without grinding the inside of the transmission case? Someone with more knowledge than I have should jump in here.
|
11-23-2021, 10:45 AM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Quote:
Not sure with a 11 ? My problem is the throwout bearing is to far away from the plate. Last edited by Harold Degand; 11-23-2021 at 10:50 AM. |
|
11-23-2021, 10:55 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,301
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Last edited by deuce lover; 11-23-2021 at 11:00 AM. |
11-23-2021, 10:58 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
|
11-23-2021, 11:44 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,301
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Here.The last pic shows how the assy should look when not depressed.How much play do you have?
Last edited by deuce lover; 11-23-2021 at 12:14 PM. |
11-23-2021, 11:55 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,422
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
The new reproduction 10" Long type clutches don't have the adjustable fingers. A lot of folks here in the US still send there original clutch covers out for rebuild and adjustment. Fort Wayne Clutch in Indiana is a common place to send them here. This may not be so common in Europe. Even finding a good core in the EU could be challenging. Those old French SUMB military trucks had big truck stuff on them and those 11" jobs are pretty heavy. It really slows the throttle response down.
|
11-23-2021, 11:58 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,301
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
I think he got the pars from USA.Looks like what Speedway sells.
|
11-23-2021, 12:18 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,303
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Re : Fort Wayne Clutch. Here's a post I made on the H.A.M.B. a couple of months ago :
I just got off the phone with Fort Wayne Clutch and I thought the folks here might be interested on how the conversation went. As a bit of background, I found a core left over from when I changed the clutch in my '51 Ford back in 2016. It was complete, in the original box, and had all of the original paperwork, including a sheet that said it was returnable for a $20 core charge as well as a UPS return label. Since I purchased it five years ago, I called them to make sure the return would go through and they told me that they didn't want it, as they were selling all new components now. This aroused my curiosity, and I asked him where they were able to get new components these days. He answered, and this is a direct quote : "Oh, some guy named 'Wong Fu'." |
11-23-2021, 12:21 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
I’ll take some pics ASAP.
Parts come from Mac’s. We don’t have NAPA stores here in EU. To save money, every order I make takes 3 to 4 months for delivery. I assume that choice but not easy to work with. |
11-23-2021, 12:38 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,301
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Quote:
Good one tubman !! I have lots of stories of Speedwu and Macwu but this is not the thread for them. |
|
11-23-2021, 08:02 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,422
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
I have to send my cores to them to get them overhauled. They don't have the old Borg & Beck stuff in stock and no one reproduces them. I wouldn't be surprised if they sell new stuff instead of doing exchanges. The new ones likely cost less than the overhauls. You get what you pay for though. I have never done an exchange with them yet.
|
11-23-2021, 09:59 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
It’s a shame for a seller like Mac’s to sell parts they fit but couldn’t work.
I didn’t notice when I bought it there’s no adjuster. And when I installed it, I thought it will not be a problem. Very disappointed. |
11-24-2021, 12:07 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Found this. Could it help ?
But it’s for a tractor https://www.dennis-carpenter.com/tra...it---10-spline |
11-24-2021, 08:51 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Here are the pics.
#1 space between bearing and plate #2 when bearing is close the plate. The rod is 1’’ to short #3 space between bearing and case, bearing against plate |
11-24-2021, 09:14 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,301
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Looks like you have the B-7521A 3 9/16 " long.The 34 is 4 11/16". V8 Ford sales has one that is 4 inches long.Would that work?
Last edited by deuce lover; 11-24-2021 at 09:23 AM. |
11-24-2021, 09:26 AM | #19 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Quote:
|
|
11-24-2021, 09:30 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,301
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Then you need the 34. Southside Obsolete or ThirdGen might have one. ThirdGen phone number is 844-327-5988.They open at 10:00.
|
11-24-2021, 09:38 AM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Thanks Deuce Lover
|
11-24-2021, 10:02 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,301
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
You're welcome.I looked to see if I had one in my leftover parts-no luck.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
11-24-2021, 10:54 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Just wondering, is the bearing guide long enough ?
No risk of damaging anything ? |
11-24-2021, 11:22 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,301
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Have someone help you and push on the lever while you look inside and see how much it moves. I am trying to understand why you have this issue and maybe its the flywheel - not thick enough? Just a guess. Hopefully another member will chime in. Is your French Flathead the 4.2L and is the flywheel original to the engine? I am not familiar with those,only the 3.9L which is like the 59AB.
Last edited by deuce lover; 11-24-2021 at 11:28 AM. |
11-24-2021, 02:33 PM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
My engine is a 3.9 L. The flywheel is the same as Ford except they are drilled for 11’’ clutch.
I think the issue is the missing adjusters. So the plate isn’t thick enough. With the rod in a normal size, I mean not full unscrewed or screwed, my pedal is close to the floor when the bearing contact the plate. |
11-24-2021, 07:41 PM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PETALUMA CALI
Posts: 88
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
11-27-2021, 03:15 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,062
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
I've never used the clutch arm adjusters to adjust pedal play (on any car) - they come setup from the manufacturer to ensure even engagement with the throw-out bearing. They are not meant to be used to adjust pedal play (to the best of my knowledge).
When you put a new clutch disc in, it is probably thicker than your original one - which causes the fingers to be further down. I'd expect this . . . so the question is whether or not your throw-out bearing is TOO far out on the sleeve. I agree with Deuce Lover - have somebody depress the pedal until you feel the clutch fingers and see where the throw-out bearing sleeve is located. You should be able to determine whether or not it is still correctly engaged with the sleeve - if so, then maybe change the rod as noted above. Is the 39 trans using a 32 arm on the cross-shaft or a 39 arm on the cross shaft (they're completely different in length). As long as the throw-out bearing is correctly engaged with the sleeve, I'd have no problem "customizing" the length of the rod to accomplish the desired free-play. |
11-27-2021, 03:20 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,062
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
By "customizing", I've cut them before (close to the eyelet), added some additional rod material in the middle and TIG welded them back together to achieve whatever length I needed for whatever car I was working on.
|
11-27-2021, 07:03 PM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
The new disk have the same thickness than the 11’’ from the truck.
I have a late 32 arm release. I’ll check ASAP when somebody depress clutch. I can’t be the only one with this problem. Thank you all for your replies anyway. Last edited by Harold Degand; 11-28-2021 at 02:38 AM. |
11-28-2021, 10:15 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,062
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Given your setup, I wonder if the clutch arms are in the right location when you bolt it down to the flywheel? I'd probably take the original pressure plate and disc, install them and use some sort of flat disc on top of the fingers and measure the depth to the flywheel. I'd do the same with the new setup - just so you have a frame of reference as to how far down the levers are as compared to your 11" setup.
For your pedal to be that different with the new clutch sure sounds like a clutch plate issue at this point in the discussion. Also, I'd want to talk to a clutch manufacturer - where you can get somebody who understands exactly what you're talking about. I tend to deal with flywheel/clutch manufacturers and don't just buy these types of components from the "general" parts houses. My recent flathead flywheel/clutch builds have been done by RAM (high performance and racing stuff), have not used a stock clutch in years on my own builds. I have used Ft. Wayne for multiple street performance and stock type builds with no problems. |
11-28-2021, 04:53 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Above the gnat line in Georgia
Posts: 7,009
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
What's the matter with cutting it off with a hacksaw? Duh.
__________________
Life is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer to the end, the faster it goes. It is better to be seen, than viewed. "We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm". |
11-28-2021, 06:31 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,062
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
|
11-29-2021, 05:10 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,744
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
I have that setup on my roadster. You just need to make a longer pushrod. You could make the clevis longer by welding a nut onto the end. That may be simpler than extending the rod. Your choice.
|
11-29-2021, 06:30 AM | #34 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Here are the pics !
#1 the rod and the clevis assembled. #2 the clutch pedal on the normal position #3 the pedal when the bearing contact the pressure plate #4 the gap when bearing contact the plate #5 gap when depressing the clutch. Can’t go further, the pedal contact the steering box |
11-29-2021, 12:25 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,743
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Does your throw out bearing hub look like the photo in post #8 ?? It appears to be much different in the photos you have posted. In posting #8 the center photo shows the throw out hub and in the third photo you can see the assembly.
|
11-29-2021, 12:35 PM | #36 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Quote:
It is the same on mine. |
|
11-29-2021, 01:57 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,062
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
The hub/bearing looks standard to me . . . it is just WAY forward before it engages with the clutch forks/fingers. I think there is something wrong with the clutch and/or disc combination - that results in the clutch fingers being way closer to the flywheel than the original clutch you had in it.
Just to ask an obvious question - is the clutch disc correctly installed and the springs are NOT hitting the flywheel bolts? |
11-29-2021, 03:27 PM | #38 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Quote:
The disk is in the right position |
|
11-29-2021, 03:38 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,744
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
The adjusters aren't "missing" the plate is designed to be used like that.
|
11-29-2021, 04:26 PM | #40 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
|
11-29-2021, 04:50 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,062
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
What Mart and I are both saying is that it really has nothing to do with having adjusters on the fingers. There are many clutch plates that don't have adjusters - that fit the same application as another manufacturer that has adjusters (same engine, same year, same flywheel). The adjusters are strictly a method for the manufacturer to align the contact surfaces of the fingers with the throw-out bearing. Some Mfgrs use them, some don't . . .
Fact is, there is something wrong with the actual clutch plate, it's design and/or how it interacts with the clutch disc. Having adjusters would NOT change a thing in that the finger contact areas need to be somewhere around 1/2" higher than they are - the reason they aren't high enough, I can't guess from pictures. Having adjusters would not solve the problem. Last edited by Bored&Stroked; 11-29-2021 at 04:56 PM. |
11-29-2021, 07:40 PM | #42 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Ok now I get it. My apologies.
I’ll try with an endoscope to look inside the clutch assy to find out. Last edited by Harold Degand; 11-30-2021 at 12:09 AM. |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
11-29-2021, 08:43 PM | #43 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
I was wrong, parts came from Speedway and not Mac’s but it doesn’t matter.
I think I bought the right parts |
12-01-2021, 01:31 PM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 293
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
That pressure plate looks way too tall, I have a '41 transmission in mine and it doesn't look as tall as that.
For the best advice and parts go to: http://www.vanpeltsales.com/ He flat knows these transmissions, check out his website. |
12-04-2021, 08:26 AM | #45 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
I tried with increasing the length of the pushrod.
If now the bearing come closer the plate, when the bearing return toward the trans, the clutch pedal come back to much |
12-04-2021, 09:26 AM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,744
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Try and adjust the length so the clutch is just released at about 2/3 of pedal travel. Then see where the pedal sits when just clear of the bearing. Mock up or imagine a floorboard in place which gives both an upper and lower travel limit for the pedal. Mart. |
12-04-2021, 11:33 AM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,301
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Harold, To me you have a 4.2 litre French Marmon engine. Those are like the 8BA but with the 59A style bellhousing.So your flywheel may be different than a 59A.I don't know.You might have to install a sleeve that slips over the collar that the release bearing holder slides on to stop the pedal from retracting to far.I had to do that on a T5 that I installed in my 36 Ford years ago.Here are pics plus one of yours that I edited as its to dark.
|
12-04-2021, 12:47 PM | #48 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Quote:
And you’re right, the floor will limit the movement of the pedal in one way and the other. |
|
12-04-2021, 12:50 PM | #49 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Quote:
The flywheel is the same as a 59a. |
|
12-28-2021, 01:32 AM | #50 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Some update of my post
I put the floor back on. I noticed the initial position of the pedals is lower than I thought. So the pushrod is now 1/2’’ to short instead of 1’’. I will remove the stop under the floor and put the extension I make on the rod. Problem will be solved. Thank you all guys for your help ! |
12-28-2021, 05:00 AM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,744
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Hello Harold.
I recently fitted a clutch of the type you show, in place of an older unit with the fingers. The clutch pedal still works, but the release point is lower than it was before. I will have to make an adjustment to bring the pedal up a bit. I will show it in an upcoming video. Mart. |
12-28-2021, 11:25 AM | #52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: sw minnesota
Posts: 4,567
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
I have found that when doing the mock up for pedal position, body on or off, you can clamp a flat piece of steel or wood onto the transmission flat spot where the serial number is to simulate the floorboard location. Not exact, but close enough for it to function, and do a finale adjustment once the floorboards are in place
|
09-19-2022, 04:53 AM | #53 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 4
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
Quote:
the Marmons had other embossed writings on the bellhousing and a pad to mount the rebuild plaque. plus i have never seen the writing on the back of the engine center part above the bell housing. this is where the marmon had it´s oil filter and more like Cargo or even early Simca. but i may be wrong. Harold: Why didn´t you stick with the 11"clutch? i run a 4.2 marmon with 11"clutch and 39 trans (78case) with no issue . other than popping out of second. but that has nothing to do with the clutch and i´m working on that following are 4.2 Marmon pics. green is cast 1980 by FN black is cast 1975 by FAPS grey is cast 1970 by FAPS (brass rebuild plaque) Last edited by FlatJan; 09-19-2022 at 11:58 AM. |
|
09-19-2022, 05:18 AM | #54 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Belgium, West Europ
Posts: 87
|
Re: 1932 clutch issue
It is a 3.9 Cargo.
I used a 10 in clutch instead the 11 because the weight. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|