|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-24-2016, 10:48 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Napier, New Zealand
Posts: 2,001
|
Rule of thumb ?
Generally speaking, when compression is raised on an otherwise stock engine, does the ignition need to be advanced, retarded, or stay where it is. I've done a search, but cant find anything on this.
|
02-24-2016, 11:01 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,687
|
Re: Rule of thumb ?
Rule of thumb retarded I'd say , but .. It might run fine the way it is.. ?
__________________
"Came too close to dying to stop living now!" |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
02-24-2016, 11:30 PM | #3 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
Re: Rule of thumb ?
Ignition advance has more to do with the shape of the combustion chamber, fuel used, etc. Compression would become an issue if you are getting into a "pinging" situation and needed to back the advance off. Compression is related to the burn rate of the fuel and higher compression requires a slower burning fuel.
|
02-24-2016, 11:32 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 5,762
|
Re: Rule of thumb ?
What Talkwrench said - retarded. I learned that driving various elevations from 15,000 feet to below sea level. Always have to advance the timing going up (less air = less compression) and retard it going down (more air - more compression) to keep the engine running right.
__________________
Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome) "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” *Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness |
02-25-2016, 04:00 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,744
|
Re: Rule of thumb ?
Agree with above - the rule of thumb would be that more compression would require the ignition to be retarded. But that would infer that was at it's maximum advance beforehand. As said, it may run fine as is or even take more advance if the timing was not particularly well set up beforehand. If it was previously set at the ragged edge of detonation, the raised compression may require the ignition to be backed off a tad.
The message is, don't just retard it because it is what you are "supposed" to do. Mart. |
02-25-2016, 06:26 AM | #6 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fitzgerald, Georgia
Posts: 2,204
|
Re: Rule of thumb ?
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
JWL |
02-25-2016, 09:03 AM | #7 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
Re: Rule of thumb ?
Thanks for the reminder JWL, I don't remember reading that part!
|
02-25-2016, 02:52 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Napier, New Zealand
Posts: 2,001
|
Re: Rule of thumb ?
|
02-25-2016, 07:36 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,687
|
Re: Rule of thumb ?
Are you having probs Bassman , or was it a general question?
__________________
"Came too close to dying to stop living now!" |
02-26-2016, 02:45 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Napier, New Zealand
Posts: 2,001
|
Re: Rule of thumb ?
|
02-26-2016, 02:52 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Napier, New Zealand
Posts: 2,001
|
Re: Rule of thumb ?
I re-read JWL's treatise on the matter, and it made sense. Increasing compression slows down the flame (increases the lag time), so reducing advance would be the rule of thumb.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|