Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-26-2018, 09:08 PM   #1
russcc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,871
Default Bearing clearance

Question for the engine builders. In the process of assembling the 59L block, 3 & 5/16" bore, Merc crank, ground 0.010 under, balanced rotating assembly. NOS Federal Mogul 0.010 under main bearings.
Vern Tardel's book, page 143, Main bearing cap clearance 0.001-0.001.5, using plastigage
Ford Motor Company V8 engine repair manual, 1948, Page 131a, Main bearing liner clearance 0.000-0.003
Ron Holleran's book, Nostalgia, Page 8., crank clearance 0.001-0.003, "grind or polish to the low side".


Opinions on main bearing clearance. Is their an advantage to having a little more clearance ? Thank you Fordbarners.
russcc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2018, 09:57 PM   #2
Talkwrench
Senior Member
 
Talkwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,687
Default Re: Bearing clearance

I no expert here , but loose is power, tighter is longevity. if its too loose then you end up back to having a loss of oil pressure and thats was the need for "high volume" oil pumps . From memory mine was closer to .003 but felt nice and I have great oil pressure.
__________________
"Came too close to dying to stop living now!"
Talkwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 11-27-2018, 12:16 AM   #3
RalphM
Senior Member
 
RalphM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 2,646
Default Re: Bearing clearance

I think Vern’s got it nailed down, also as RON says to low side.
RalphM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 02:11 AM   #4
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: Bearing clearance

The low tolerance depends on how much the crankshaft flex under power...more power you need bigger clearance and thicker oil.
If youre main bearing bore in the block is good and straight you can go for tighter gaps....
Tighter bearings and lower grade oil is less powerloss...just have to find out when the bearing clearance is tight enough...or maybe you really donīt want to find out just that...
The babbit on a bearing shell is only .0005 thick and thatīs what acts as a dry lube film before the oilpressure is up to tight clearance or misalignment in mainbore and that will be gone fast..
The old rule of thumb is .0007 to .001 clearance per inch of bearing diameter for a stock bearing.
So 1-1.5 thousands and a straight mainbore will be just fine...the .003 is the maximum clearance on a used engine when serviced or for racing.
There are 2 reasons to open up the clearance more oilflow to cool the bearings and to accept the crankshaft deformation under power.
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 06:08 AM   #5
russcc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,871
Default Re: Bearing clearance

Thank you Fordbarners. Any other experiences to share like Talkwrench's "closer to 0.003 and great oil pressure. Very good point about more clearance equals better oil flow, which means better cooling. Ron says that in his book, that being the purpose of oil to cool the parts.
russcc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 08:01 AM   #6
JSeery
Member Emeritus
 
JSeery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
Default Re: Bearing clearance

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Like most things, it is all a balancing act. Tighter clearances can use thinner oil viscosity, the greater the clearance the higher the viscosity the oil and/or pressure required. There are pros and cons to all of this. Another factor is engine life. A race engine will most likely have a shorter engine life in terms of the total number of engine cycles compared to a daily drive vehicle. When you start out with a larger clearance there is less margin until you are at a upper clearance limit.
JSeery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 08:27 AM   #7
Frank Miller
Senior Member
 
Frank Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auburn, MA
Posts: 2,106
Default Re: Bearing clearance

My two cents. A race engine operates at high rpm for extended periods and the higher clearances allow more oil to flow and cool the bearing. Because these are frequently torn down the wear is taken up when new bearings are installed. The tighter clearances will allow adequate oil for a street engine and as the bearings wear a bit they will still be within specs. I think mine was around 1 to 1.5 and it's still going after 35000 or so miles
__________________
“The technique of infamy is to start two lies at once and get people arguing heatedly over which is true.” ~ Ezra Pound
Frank Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 08:35 AM   #8
marko39
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: harpursville ny
Posts: 1,038
Default Re: Bearing clearance

Quote:
Originally Posted by russcc View Post
Question for the engine builders. In the process of assembling the 59L block, 3 & 5/16" bore, Merc crank, ground 0.010 under, balanced rotating assembly. NOS Federal Mogul 0.010 under main bearings.
Vern Tardel's book, page 143, Main bearing cap clearance 0.001-0.001.5, using plastigage
Ford Motor Company V8 engine repair manual, 1948, Page 131a, Main bearing liner clearance 0.000-0.003
Ron Holleran's book, Nostalgia, Page 8., crank clearance 0.001-0.003, "grind or polish to the low side".


Opinions on main bearing clearance. Is their an advantage to having a little more clearance ? Thank you Fordbarners.
had my crank checked and main caps aligned honed crank is also a merc. .010 under. machinist said front and center bearings have .002 and rear is at .001. he said it was within spec but the engines he builds he likes to see at least .002. he said to try a different bearing to get the .002 Mark
marko39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 08:47 AM   #9
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,843
Default Re: Bearing clearance

I wrote that book back in the late 80's, after spending most of my building time on racing engines. Published in 1992. Over the past 25 years, I've learned allot about engine building, you can't stay stagment in a field like this. The vast majority of these engines are now used in street applications. However, the bearing load factors have increased by larger displacements and compression ratios. What most people don't realize is the fact that tight bearing clearances create heat with high viscosity oils. Stock clearances of .001/.002 must have a thinner grade oil to prevent this. Today, Main bearing clearances are much tighter in performance engines, I try to get .0025 +/- .0002. Rod clearance depending on he type rod and bearing and following the manufactures recommend numbers . We also have to consider the advances made in the quality of the oil available today. Modern auto engines are small in displacement yet produce a great deal of power, and last hundreds of thousands of miles using a lubricant that runs like water at 200 F. I hope some of the new builders will look into this, there is no reason why these engines can't giver reliable service for 100,000 miles or more.
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 09:54 AM   #10
GOSFAST
Senior Member
 
GOSFAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,052
Default Re: Bearing clearance

On just about every Flattie we build we aim for .002"/.0025" on both the rods and mains! We consider this "ideal" for most street/strip applications.

One area we always check first are the main bore sizes AND the rod bore sizes. These numbers will have an effect on your actual clearances. If any of these holes are "out-of-spec" they need to addressed first, before attempting any bearing clearance checks!

The ride in my signature now has (I believe) over 40,000 miles on it and hasn't had a single issue to date. This unit has over 150 HP and over 260# Torque!

Read the P.S. below here, it is important when a crank needs grinding? We will NOT grind any cranks here that aren't included in an ongoing build UNLESS the customer gives us an accurate number, both rods AND mains.

Thanks, Gary in N.Y.

P.S. The one advantage you WILL have grinding the crank to any undersizes over using all new components, is you will be able to pre-measure the rod/main bearings in their respective locations THEN grind the desired clearances directly into the crank. Doesn't get any more accurate when done this way. It does take a very experienced grinder to get the sizes you need.
GOSFAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 12:21 PM   #11
Kohnke Rebabbitting
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 60615,330th Ave.,Clare, Iowa, 50524
Posts: 1,457
Default Re: Bearing clearance

Quote:
Originally Posted by russcc View Post
Question for the engine builders. In the process of assembling the 59L block, 3 & 5/16" bore, Merc crank, ground 0.010 under, balanced rotating assembly. NOS Federal Mogul 0.010 under main bearings.
Vern Tardel's book, page 143, Main bearing cap clearance 0.001-0.001.5, using plastigage
Ford Motor Company V8 engine repair manual, 1948, Page 131a, Main bearing liner clearance 0.000-0.003
Ron Holleran's book, Nostalgia, Page 8., crank clearance 0.001-0.003, "grind or polish to the low side".


Opinions on main bearing clearance. Is their an advantage to having a little more clearance ? Thank you Fordbarners.
Main and Rod clearance should be .001 per inch of crank. a 2 inch crank should have .002 thousandths clearance, or plus a half, .000-50 tops.

At .001, or .001-50, you will be pushing usable bearing material out of the way, and wasting it, on a 2" crank.

From cold to hot, a 2" crank will swell .002 thousandths.

Herm.
Kohnke Rebabbitting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 02:09 PM   #12
40 Deluxe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,774
Default Re: Bearing clearance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kohnke Rebabbitting View Post
Main and Rod clearance should be .001 per inch of crank. a 2 inch crank should have .002 thousandths clearance, or plus a half, .000-50 tops.

At .001, or .001-50, you will be pushing usable bearing material out of the way, and wasting it, on a 2" crank.

From cold to hot, a 2" crank will swell .002 thousandths.

Herm.
Does this mean that at operating temperature .000" oil clearance is acceptable?
40 Deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 03:20 PM   #13
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: Bearing clearance

The old rule of thumb says 0.0007-0.001 clearance per inch of bearing...
And remember all metal in the engine expand...not only the crank.
But im a youngster in this crowd...only owned and operating a crankgrinder for 20+ years...
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 04:17 PM   #14
40 Deluxe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,774
Default Re: Bearing clearance

Quote:
Originally Posted by flatheadmurre View Post
The old rule of thumb says 0.0007-0.001 clearance per inch of bearing...
And remember all metal in the engine expand...not only the crank.
But im a youngster in this crowd...only owned and operating a crankgrinder for 20+ years...
So the next question is: How much does the bore of the connecting rod expand at operating temperature? Is it more or less than the crankpin expands?
40 Deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 04:50 PM   #15
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: Bearing clearance

Itīs all about material and heat...like the difference between a steel rod and an aluminum rod....the aluminum rod expands much more then the steel.
If you like to play around with different bearing clearances and oil to get the optimum setup King Bearings has or atleast had a program called ENSIM.
Another thing is that the rotational effect creating an oil wedge in the bearing doesnīt work as good at low rews as high...so big bearing clearances below 2000rpm is bad while keeping up the rpm makes it work just fine.
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 07:00 PM   #16
russcc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,871
Default Re: Bearing clearance

Thank you all. Learned a lot. Good points about expansion of the parts due to heat, measuring the mains and rods and grinding the crank to deliver the clearance you want, and oil viscosity vs clearance. The machine shop ended up getting a clearance of 0.002.5, on the mains, which I believe both myself and the engine will be happy with.
russcc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2018, 09:29 PM   #17
GB SISSON
Senior Member
 
GB SISSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Orcas Island Washington
Posts: 4,848
Default Re: Bearing clearance

This is a very fascinating subject. I think about this kind of thing when I lay awake at night. It's a good point to think of the big end of the rod and it's bearing in a linear fashion. 6" plus of strap heated does get a good bit longer. I argue with a friend who also does a LOT of work on old trucks. In every case he heats stuck bolts cherry red in his (usually successful) attempt to break them loose. I choose to heat the nut or surrounding area if practical. As for bearing clearances, the owner of my local napa store tells me he stocks plastigage for me, as I'm the only person who ever buys it. I'd be lost without it. Thanks all for the info on this thread.
__________________
Owner/Operator of 'Jailbar Ranch' on the side of Mt. Pickett. Current stable consists of 1946 1/2 ton pickup turned woodie wagon with FH V8, 1947 Tonner Pickup (red) mostly stock with exception of a cummins 6at turbo diesel, 1946 Tonner Pickup (green) with 226 cu in 6 cyl flathead, 1979 Toyota landcruiser wagon, completely encased in 1947 Ford Jailbar sheet metal. Ok, cornbinder rear fenders..... 'Rusty ol' floorboards, hot on their feet' (Alan Jackson)
GB SISSON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2018, 12:44 AM   #18
RalphM
Senior Member
 
RalphM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 2,646
Default Re: Bearing clearance

Funny you mention that about the plastigauge, I recently spoke to a fellow that rebuilt large industrial air compressors, he mentioned replacing the lower “rod” bearings and I said well make sure you check your clearances with plastigauge, and he didn’t know what it was. In his defense, he was not a mechanic, but this was an additional duty tacked onto his job.
RalphM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2018, 03:43 PM   #19
Kohnke Rebabbitting
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 60615,330th Ave.,Clare, Iowa, 50524
Posts: 1,457
Default Re: Bearing clearance

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40 Deluxe View Post
Does this mean that at operating temperature .000" oil clearance is acceptable?
I am not understanding your Question, Mr. 40. I may be still not woke up!

But if you set a 2" crank clearance at .001, or .001-50, you will have a crank clearance at .000, as a Hot crank will be larger then that clearance. So what happens is, either the crank, or the babbitt in the insert has to give for size, and it won't be the crank!

Fortunately, after that, a hot crank will open up a bearing to what ever it needs for clearance, to survive.

So the whole idea of setting the correct clearance for any bearing, is to keep the bearing surface, as much as you can, from smearing, and wasting any measurable amount, of surface, for the most longevity.

One last thing, if say an engine in an Auto is pushed at high RPM's, much of the time, (not as bad in a pressure engine), but at high RPM's, the bearing clearance will be greater, then if it were driven at preferred normal speeds. This is more noticeable, in a splash engine.

Thanks,

Herm.
Kohnke Rebabbitting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2018, 04:07 PM   #20
Kohnke Rebabbitting
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 60615,330th Ave.,Clare, Iowa, 50524
Posts: 1,457
Default Re: Bearing clearance

Quote:
Originally Posted by russcc View Post
Thank you all. Learned a lot. Good points about expansion of the parts due to heat, measuring the mains and rods and grinding the crank to deliver the clearance you want, and oil viscosity vs clearance. The machine shop ended up getting a clearance of 0.002.5, on the mains, which I believe both myself and the engine will be happy with.
Your .002-50 should be correct at that clearance. With oil, you will never hurt those bearings, at break in.

Herm.
Kohnke Rebabbitting is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.