|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-13-2016, 10:38 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: NE Iowa
Posts: 1,664
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
If you switch from the 4.27 to the 3.92 you only drop around 230 RPM for the same speed.
|
02-13-2016, 10:41 AM | #22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 13
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
02-13-2016, 11:01 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,425
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
Just a heads up, I went to the link and checked the info on that R&P set. It should have more info on there than it has. The smaller ring gears were generally set up on a smaller diameter carrier by Dana Spicer. I would want to know what diameter carrier that R&P set was made to fit (bolt circle diameter). If it is the smaller carrier, you would have to purchase one from Randy's R&P since I know of no other "New" part source but they are for Dana 44 and may not work in the 41. It may be made to fit the 3.73:1 carrier that is smaller than the 4.27:1 ratio carrier in the Dana 44 but I don't know about the Dana 41. The ring gear just has to be measured for the bolt circle diameter.
Last edited by rotorwrench; 02-13-2016 at 11:07 AM. |
02-13-2016, 11:41 AM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,438
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
Quote:
Here's the difference in Above and Below the 3.73 split on all D4x carriers
__________________
'52 F-1, EAB flathead |
|
02-13-2016, 11:46 AM | #25 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
You would most likely be better off changing out the whole rear end.
|
02-13-2016, 03:30 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,425
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
With a pickup, I would prefer the 3.73:1 R&P so you could still easily pull a load. The taller gears will make it more difficult to do that. If you aren't planning on pulling a trailer or load the bed up very much, you might be OK. Last edited by rotorwrench; 02-13-2016 at 03:38 PM. |
02-13-2016, 05:24 PM | #27 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 13
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
I called Early Ford V8 before I ordered to make sure they would fit. They assured me that they would fit the Dana 41 with the 4.27 ratio. These guys have these made in Europe and are the only place that I know of that you can get these gears.
I don't intend the haul anything of any weight and I just wanted a low rpm at 65-70 mph. |
05-08-2017, 07:24 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wellington New Zealand
Posts: 308
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
Quote:
I have a Dana 41 that I am interested in changing to this gearing. I see Early Ford V8 sales also have a ring and pinion installation kit (8C-4200-KIT) for the Dana 41. I haven't found anywhere else that offers parts for the Dana 44. |
|
05-09-2017, 07:08 AM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: u-rah-rah-Wisconsin
Posts: 1,136
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
Take a look at the offerings from Randy's: https://www.ringpinion.com
__________________
19 and 49 F1 - jes' like Henry II built 1946 Deluxe - as Henry built it |
05-09-2017, 08:06 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Black Hills, SD
Posts: 577
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
I'd be interested to know how you got along setting it up. I've done quite a few Dana's and a few of them set right up with the old shims. Most needed shimmed for the correct contact pattern and that has it's own procedure which normally requires changing shimming under the bearings. I actually have the Snap-on puller set just for the carrier bearings but it doesn't have much to grab on and will generally destroy the shims. The easiest way is a set of sacrificial bearings (for the set up only) with this inside ground out a little so they easily slide on and off.
Also you have to shim in the bearing preload. I never had a case spreader, just wonked the carrier in with a big dead blow. But that method requires a feel only attained by experience. Pinion preload is set with an inch/pound torque wrench |
05-09-2017, 08:46 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: 36 miles north of Albany NY
Posts: 2,946
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
That is one clean/nice looking truck, how did you make out with yor ring gear swap?
|
05-09-2017, 09:42 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bowling Green KY
Posts: 337
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
9=1949 or 50
H=6 cylinder 226 C=half ton I had a 4.27 in mine. Got lucky and found a 3.73?from a 56 automatic F-100. Seems to be just right. |
05-09-2017, 02:48 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wellington New Zealand
Posts: 308
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
In my earlier post that should have been 'I haven't been able to find parts for the Dana 41'. Thanks for the link to Randy's who has parts for the Dana 44.
I currently have a 3.73 Dana 44 from a '56 F100 in my '49 F1, but would like to put back my original Dana 41. I'm up for a set of tyres soon and am thinking of changing from my current 6:50-16 to 6:00-16. The 3.54 crown wheel and pinion (assuming it can all be made to work in the Dana 41) should keep the RPM in about the same place. |
05-09-2017, 03:08 PM | #34 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
That's what I was going to suggest, wouldn't be easier to just change tire size?
|
05-09-2017, 07:04 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wellington New Zealand
Posts: 308
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
Smaller tyres mean higher engine RPM and a 3.54 diff lower RPM, therefore compensation for smaller tyres.
|
05-09-2017, 07:25 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,438
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
Pretty hard to get a 10% difference in tire diameter, unless you want modern "rubber band" tires.
__________________
'52 F-1, EAB flathead |
05-09-2017, 08:17 PM | #37 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
If anyone is interested:
RPM = (MPH X GR X 336) / Tire Dia TD / RPM (using 3.73 GR & 65 MPH) 26 3,108 28 2,886 30 2,694 32 2,525 34 2,377 36 2,245 And GR / RPM (30 inch Tire Size & 65 MPH) 4.27 3,109 3.73 2,715 3.54 2,577 Last edited by JSeery; 05-09-2017 at 08:28 PM. |
05-09-2017, 08:53 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Lynden, WA
Posts: 1,564
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
I've only had my F1 for 3 months, but one of the things I noticed right away was the 9 inch diff. Anyone's that's been around any hot rods has seen a 9 inch! Mine has 3.70 ratio tag on it and by the way it drives I'd say that's correct. It has the non-syncro 4-speed and takes considerable clutch slipping to get her rolling while starting off in second. I don't think I'd want the ratio any higher. In looking around at it's install, it looks like it belongs there and I don't see any DIY hacking.
|
05-09-2017, 09:00 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Lynden, WA
Posts: 1,564
|
Re: 1949 Ford F1 question
BTW, my truck has 15 inch/P235/75 radials on it. It looks maybe lowered a bit? Maybe it's just the smaller wheels?
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|