Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2019, 06:11 PM   #1
elwood
Senior Member
 
elwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,046
Default 1940 221 rods

Crazy little thing, she had ..
1 - L1 rod
2 - L2 rods
2 - L3 rods
And 3 with no numbers on them .
Probably ran like a top …
elwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2019, 11:43 AM   #2
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,367
Default Re: 1940 221 rods

Some large overhaul shops didn't pay any attention to the numbers on the rods. They didn't keep track of matched sets.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 02-17-2019, 02:54 PM   #3
elwood
Senior Member
 
elwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,046
Default Re: 1940 221 rods

rotorwrench, that kinda sucks hu, Im kinda weird about putting things like they should be, don't think that's gonna happen here, I think Ill measure and weigh them all and if all is good, Ill just have everything balanced.
elwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2019, 07:37 PM   #4
Ggmac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,073
Default Re: 1940 221 rods

Quote:
Originally Posted by elwood View Post
rotorwrench, that kinda sucks hu, Im kinda weird about putting things like they should be, don't think that's gonna happen here, I think Ill measure and weigh them all and if all is good, Ill just have everything balanced.
Don't get too suprised by the outcome .
Ggmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2019, 08:53 PM   #5
elwood
Senior Member
 
elwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,046
Default Re: 1940 221 rods

Why is that Ggmac ?
I bet it would run fine right there lol ..
elwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2019, 08:58 PM   #6
JSeery
Member Emeritus
 
JSeery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
Default Re: 1940 221 rods

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Always a good idea to check each rod anyway, so not much, if any, extra effort.
JSeery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2019, 12:29 PM   #7
Bored&Stroked
Senior Member
 
Bored&Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,009
Default Re: 1940 221 rods

You can pretty much look at the forgings and numbers/letters to determine if they are the same 'version'. Unless they threw in some earlier rods (really spindly), then they should all be either 91A or 21A rods (all 8 of them). If you are having the rods balanced, make sure the shop knows the specifics of how you balance flathead rods - it is NOT the same as modern rods that have 'balance pads' on them. Grinding on the bottom of the big-end caps is NOT the correct way to do it - should be done in a lathe with a special fixture.


Here is an example on my lathe - using 21A rods and my own fixture:

2015-02-02 21.34.42 copy.jpg

2015-02-10 13.16.06 copy.jpg

2015-02-07 19.33.56 copy.jpg

Here is the 'wrong way' - that I see all too often (great way to weaken the cap):


CapGrindingExample.jpg
Bored&Stroked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2019, 03:03 PM   #8
elwood
Senior Member
 
elwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,046
Default Re: 1940 221 rods

Thanks Bored&Stroked, where should the weight come off ?
elwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2019, 11:11 AM   #9
Bored&Stroked
Senior Member
 
Bored&Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,009
Default Re: 1940 221 rods

You'll notice on the second picture where there is a fresh machined area around the perimeter of the cap. If you look at original rods, you'll see that Ford did it the same way. They also took material off the small end of the rod by turning the bushing area on both sides. Just take a bit of time checking out an original rod and you can see exactly what I'm talking about.
Bored&Stroked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2019, 02:15 PM   #10
Ggmac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,073
Default Re: 1940 221 rods

What I meant is , if you're having it balanced , let them do it . I wouldn't add any info to the mix .
It's not just the overall weight . If you know this please forgive. Its measuring the big end and little . With the nuts your going to use . Not that a buggered nut would throw off the numbers too much .
Ggmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2019, 05:20 PM   #11
Lawrie
Senior Member
 
Lawrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Qld, Australia
Posts: 4,195
Default Re: 1940 221 rods

I use an assortment of ARP nuts to also help adjust the big end weight.
Lawrie
Lawrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2019, 08:11 PM   #12
Bored&Stroked
Senior Member
 
Bored&Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,009
Default Re: 1940 221 rods

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawrie View Post
I use an assortment of ARP nuts to also help adjust the big end weight.
Lawrie
Be a bit careful about aftermarket nuts on the early 91A/21A/29A rods - in some cases the base dimensions don't actually fit the machined areas of the caps (they ride on the perimeter).

So put some die-chem on the rod caps and tighten down the cap (in a rod vise) with the new nuts. See where the contact pattern is. You may find that it is NOT in the machined area/base, but out on the machined radius toward the inside. If so, this is a problem.
Bored&Stroked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2019, 08:15 PM   #13
Bored&Stroked
Senior Member
 
Bored&Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,009
Default Re: 1940 221 rods

Quote:
Originally Posted by elwood View Post
rotorwrench, that kinda sucks hu, Im kinda weird about putting things like they should be, don't think that's gonna happen here, I think Ill measure and weigh them all and if all is good, Ill just have everything balanced.
You might be able to measure things like the bore diameters, but you will not be able to determine if they are balanced by overall weight. There are specific tools/methods used to weigh the big-end, versus small end --- and you can't just throw a rod on a gram scale. So, unless you have the tools and knowledge, don't think you can figure out your rod balance at home.
Bored&Stroked is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 AM.