Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-29-2020, 04:52 AM   #1
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,781
Default this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Bought and towed this Buick home yesterday and took it for a spin around the yard.
vast world of difference to my model A fords!
heck, was thinking of disposing of all my model As, buying a cigar and living large..............
ronn is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 04:52 AM   #2
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,781
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

ronn is offline  
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 10-29-2020, 06:35 AM   #3
David R.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 430
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

nice
David R. is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 06:36 AM   #4
Patrick L.
Senior Member
 
Patrick L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 7,225
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Buick is a nice car, in a different class than the Ford.
Patrick L. is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 06:52 AM   #5
McMimmcs
Senior Member
 
McMimmcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Fort Gratiot, Michigan
Posts: 2,296
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

looks very nice, enjoy ! Wayne
McMimmcs is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 07:08 AM   #6
Chuck Dempsey
Senior Member
 
Chuck Dempsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Waynesville, NC
Posts: 784
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
What year is it? I'm guessing 1929.... And did that model come with a Rumble Seat? Looks a little small for that. Enjoy!
Chuck Dempsey is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 07:17 AM   #7
marty in Ohio
Senior Member
 
marty in Ohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Elyria, Ohio
Posts: 755
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Nice car, but don't sell the A's. What are you going to drive while the Buick is sitting in the barn waiting for parts. I don't think Snyder's or Bratton's will carry parts for it.
marty in Ohio is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 08:03 AM   #8
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,781
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

thanks guys. its a model 68- full AACA classic and puts out 100 horses.......134 whl base



model only came with a trunk, because as you said, too small. reg coupe would have a rumble.


this model is known as the victoria or opera coupe.
not selling all of the A's, but might be downsizing a bit from the 6 I have to about 3.


parts are def harder to get, but dont wear out as often.
ronn is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 09:07 AM   #9
Greg Jones
Senior Member
 
Greg Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Aiken, South Carolina
Posts: 695
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Nice looking car. I love Buicks of ANY vintage!!
Greg Jones is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 09:42 AM   #10
Will N
Senior Member
 
Will N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,101
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Nice car, I believe it's a 1930. The 1930's have that belt molding added where the door handle is mounted in order to harden up the look of the '29 Buicks which were known as "pregnant" Buicks because of, at the time, the novel and shockingly curved out door panel skins. From our perspective 90 years later, most people don't even notice it. But it was shocking at the time and '29 sales dipped because of the styling. The '30s outsold the '29s.


BTW, I'm gonna be anal retentive here, but in the title of your post you used "drug" as the past tense of "drag". This is incorrect and I see it used more and more and it drives me crazy. The past tense of drag is "dragged". Drug is what you get at the pharmacy ;-)
Will N is online now  
Old 10-29-2020, 09:48 AM   #11
Badpuppy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Guthrie, OK
Posts: 1,144
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Will N View Post
BTW, I'm gonna be anal retentive here, but in the title of your post you used "drug" as the past tense of "drag". This is incorrect and I see it used more and more and it drives me crazy. The past tense of drag is "dragged". Drug is what you get at the pharmacy ;-)
Wish you hadn't drug that up, Will.
Badpuppy is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 09:58 AM   #12
Mister Moose
Senior Member
 
Mister Moose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Hartford area, CT
Posts: 374
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Will N View Post
BTW, I'm gonna be anal retentive here, but in the title of your post you used "drug" as the past tense of "drag". This is incorrect and I see it used more and more and it drives me crazy. The past tense of drag is "dragged". Drug is what you get at the pharmacy ;-)
That's what's known as regional dialect. Like grinder, po-boy, sub, hoagie. Pop, soda, tonic, coke. Milkshake, frappe, cabinet. Everyone, y'all, and y'all y'all. That's what makes traveling interesting, the world would be boring if it's the same everywhere.
Mister Moose is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 10:06 AM   #13
jrelliott
Senior Member
 
jrelliott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pine, AZ
Posts: 794
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Very pretty vehicle! Enjoy!
jrelliott is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 10:19 AM   #14
katy
Senior Member
 
katy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 5,042
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Very nice lookin' car. Does that one have the little door on the RH side for the golf club compartment?
__________________
If you don't hear a rumor by 10 AM, start one!.
Got my education out behind the barn!
katy is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 11:40 AM   #15
Jim Brierley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,084
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Does it have a conventional shift pattern? Early Buicks had a reversed pattern.
Jim Brierley is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 11:51 AM   #16
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,781
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

BTW, I'm gonna be anal retentive here, but in the title of your post you used "drug" as the past tense of "drag". This is incorrect and I see it used more and more and it drives me crazy. The past tense of drag is "dragged". Drug is what you get at the pharmacy ;-)



I gots your attention and that in fact, was the point. Thanks for the English lesson! haha


no golf door on these. again the reg coupe does have the golf door. and yes, it is a 1930. 31 had the v-8. the torque on this bad boy- oops my language- could easily pull stumps all day!

ronn is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 11:52 AM   #17
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,781
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

yes, conventional shift pattern-H
ronn is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 11:59 AM   #18
WHN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Connecticut Shoreline
Posts: 1,818
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

More pictures, how does it run?

Enjoy.
WHN is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 12:47 PM   #19
Licensed to kill
Senior Member
 
Licensed to kill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Alberta
Posts: 930
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Absolutely LOVE it. Thanks for sharing. BTW, I git a chuckle out of "Will N"'s "english lesson". I find it interesting what little things get under peoples skin. For me, it's when people say "RPM's" rather that "RPM". It's a measure of revolutions not minutes.
Licensed to kill is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 01:07 PM   #20
Floats
Senior Member
 
Floats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Mossel Bay, about 300km from Cape Town
Posts: 530
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Congrats Ronn,
Lovit.
__________________
Regards
Chris
Cape Town
28 Model A RPU, 29 Chevy Phaeton, 67 E Type FHC, 67 250SL Pagoda, 83 911 SC
Floats is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 02:42 PM   #21
Bob-A
Senior Member
 
Bob-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central FL, USA
Posts: 1,137
Thumbs up Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Beautiful! How nice is the interior? I'd just clean it up without any "restoration" other then what is needed to make her safe to drive. Are you going to now join the Classic Car Club of America? Smoke big c-gars and leave us peon Ford drivers in your dust...?


Bob-A
Bob-A is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 02:49 PM   #22
Mad Mac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 366
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

After Model As, Buicks are my favourite vintage car, and that one is just lovely. My Great Grandmother had a '27 Buick tourer here in NZ and it was a great car too.
Mad Mac is offline  
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 10-29-2020, 04:24 PM   #23
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,781
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

runs fantastic and I really mean that..............


photos coming in a few days as it is raining cats and dogs here and only have it tarped at the moment. will be on it this weekend. sunny days coming
ronn is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 04:29 PM   #24
Synchro909
Senior Member
 
Synchro909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,495
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

I've had a fairly eclectic range of old cars over the years. Chrysler, Fiat, Ford, Delage and others. The Delage is light years ahead of any of the others for road manners and driveability - a lovely car but parts (if ever you'd need them) are not so easy to get. The Model As are are at the extreme other end of the spectrum on both counts, IMO
That Buick looks like a nice car but I bet it is thirsty. Nice find, never the less.
__________________
I'm part of the only ever generation with an analogue childhood and a digital adulthood.
Synchro909 is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 05:37 PM   #25
Jembow
Senior Member
 
Jembow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Spalding, United Kingdom
Posts: 306
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

I love it!
Jembow is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 06:07 PM   #26
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,781
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
thank you Bob A- interior looks a ok, will change out the crusty 70s carpet.......
homemade thingy!


well synchro- thirst is ok when a barrel of crude is right around 35. big ones........


yes have been pondering cigars all day and the finer things in life...... maybe a nice cognac! warms the heart........


question now is- which As to keep and which to sell. I lovem all.
ronn is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 07:24 PM   #27
Gene F
Senior Member
 
Gene F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,954
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Nice car Ronn. Those Buicks tend to go for a fair amount of money when in very good shape.
Gene F is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 09:18 PM   #28
mass A man
Senior Member
 
mass A man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Danvers, Ma.
Posts: 712
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Very nice!! Yes, a '30 opera coupe. Last year for the straight 6, 1931's were a straight 8's AND they put synchros in transmission's 2nd & 3rd gear in '31. I had a '30 4 door series 40. Your Buick had a repaint somewhere along the road, the pin-striping was never re-done. It was along the hood and belt line, very similar to Model A pin-striping scheme. The original engine fan actually has a gear driven oil pump in the hub! Overlooked by many owners. Look closely and you will see an oval-head screw in rear fan hub. That is the filler hole when you remove the screw. Be careful with the pot metal door handles. G.M. at the time thought it would be a great theft deterrent if the handle was forced down, it would shear off inside and just spin around without opening the latch! A new handle would cost $3.00 back then. Try and find them now.
mass A man is offline  
Old 10-29-2020, 09:29 PM   #29
McMimmcs
Senior Member
 
McMimmcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Fort Gratiot, Michigan
Posts: 2,296
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by mass A man View Post
Very nice!! Yes, a '30 opera coupe. Last year for the straight 6, 1931's were a straight 8's AND they put synchros in transmission's 2nd & 3rd gear in '31. I had a '30 4 door series 40. Your Buick had a repaint somewhere along the road, the pin-striping was never re-done. It was along the hood and belt line, very similar to Model A pin-striping scheme. The original engine fan actually has a gear driven oil pump in the hub! Overlooked by many owners. Look closely and you will see an oval-head screw in rear fan hub. That is the filler hole when you remove the screw. Be careful with the pot metal door handles. G.M. at the time thought it would be a great theft deterrent if the handle was forced down, it would shear off inside and just spin around without opening the latch! A new handle would cost $3.00 back then. Try and find them now.
Obviously a man with a wealth of knowledge. You should get his contact information. Wayne
McMimmcs is offline  
Old 10-30-2020, 04:09 AM   #30
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,781
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Hi Mass- yes you are correct. this car was blue red and black. someone repainted the front hood and fenders and they look real good. the rest of the cars paint.........
cracked peeling etc.


so on the handles... the trunk escutcheon was cracked into about 6 pieces. I found a 1952 esc leftover from my 52 Buick wagon and was able to make it fit. not much difference and now you can actually grab the handle.
yes correct on the 31 straight 8. was thinking the v-8 came out in 53 and had them confused.


didnt expect such positive comments on the Buick, being a ford site and had a little trepidation about posting......... thank you.
ronn is offline  
Old 10-30-2020, 05:33 AM   #31
updraught
Senior Member
 
updraught's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,969
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Buicks seemed to have quite a following here, most, if not all, would have had an open body by Holden. The guy next door keeps telling me about going roo shooting in a Marquette.

"Also in 1925, a Buick was taken around the world without a single driver, showcasing the reliability of Buick’s and GM Export’s service operations worldwide. The car was driven by dealer representatives in England, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Egypt. It traveled by trans-desert convoy to Damascus, Baghdad and Basra. Then it was on through India and Ceylon, across Australia and New Zealand, and finally and triumphantly, from San Francisco to New York. A Buick magazine of the 20’s routinely reported such events as a hill-climb victory in Africa, winning a tug-of-war with an elephant, a trek through New Zealand, and the Sultan of Johore with his Buick in the Far East. In addition to U.S. production, Buicks were built in Canada through an early agreement with the McLaughlin Carriage Co. family. This arrangement led to the creation of GM of Canada.
And, in those decades before World War ll, Buick components were shipped to such countries as Spain, Belgium, England, Australia, New Zealand, even Java, where assembly was completed.
In 1929 Buick opened a sales office in Shanghai, China. Actually, Buicks had been exported to China as early as 1912 and soon became a popular marque among Chinese business and political leaders. And in the 20’s and 30’s, Buicks built in Canada became popular with British royalty."
https://buickclub.org.au/100-years-of-buick/
updraught is offline  
Old 10-30-2020, 09:44 AM   #32
Will N
Senior Member
 
Will N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,101
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Licensed to kill View Post
Absolutely LOVE it. Thanks for sharing. BTW, I git a chuckle out of "Will N"'s "english lesson". I find it interesting what little things get under peoples skin. For me, it's when people say "RPM's" rather that "RPM". It's a measure of revolutions not minutes.



So, what is the correct plural of RPM? RsPM? Doesn't roll off the tongue too well
Will N is online now  
Old 10-30-2020, 09:58 AM   #33
Licensed to kill
Senior Member
 
Licensed to kill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Alberta
Posts: 930
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Will N View Post
So, what is the correct plural of RPM? RsPM? Doesn't roll off the tongue too well
RPM IS plural.
Licensed to kill is offline  
Old 10-30-2020, 10:52 AM   #34
30 Closed Cab PU
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,332
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by ronn View Post


didnt expect such positive comments on the Buick, being a ford site and had a little trepidation about posting......... thank you.



I also like your car, am particularly fond of cars/trucks with "patina", farmer fixes, etc. I do like all types including restored and modified. I just like to look at patina, they seem to tell a story and usually there is more to talk about with the owner.


I think your Buick is special, you just do not see many, especially in that condition. Kind of has a do not mess with me look to it with the wood spoke wheels, the paint, and the bigger tires. In my imagination looks like something a Chicago gangster would have.



I think you will find most A owners like any brand of old car/truck, it is just our preference and time period is the A.
30 Closed Cab PU is offline  
Old 10-31-2020, 03:59 PM   #35
john charlton
Senior Member
 
john charlton's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,304
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Canadian Buicks were very popular in South Africa when I was a boy .My next door neighbour had a 1948 Buick Special I seem to remember it had a straight 8 "Fire Dome" engine . After school I made pocket money by working at Mr de Beers garage which was a short bike ride from my house . I remember the prewar Buicks had the "Du bonnet" (I might have spelt that wrong) knee action front suspension . This setup did not like rough roads and began to display a marked splayed stance . Mr de Beer did a beam axle conversion using a junkyard beam axle and fore and aft springs which seemed to work quite well . In Camps Bay a lady had a cream 1948 Buick convertable with tartan seats I did lust after the car but not the owner as I must have been about 14 yrs old and I must have got my priorities right at an early age !!!

John in windy evening Suffolk County England .
john charlton is offline  
Old 11-01-2020, 03:02 PM   #36
McMimmcs
Senior Member
 
McMimmcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Fort Gratiot, Michigan
Posts: 2,296
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Will N View Post
So, what is the correct plural of RPM? RsPM? Doesn't roll off the tongue too well
With all due respect “ Ford Barn “ is not a spelling contest so the vast majority of us could care less whether you dragged or drugged or whatever. We got the message and that’s all that matters!
McMimmcs is offline  
Old 11-01-2020, 04:45 PM   #37
CHuDWah
Senior Member
 
CHuDWah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Kritter Krick, Flaw-duh
Posts: 1,158
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by McMimmcs View Post
With all due respect “ Ford Barn “ is not a spelling contest so the vast majority of us could care less whether you dragged or drugged or whatever. We got the message and that’s all that matters!

OTOH, I've seen posts where the wrong word changes the meaning to the exact opposite of what the poster intended.

And with all due respect, lose the bold font in your posts. We get the message without it.
CHuDWah is offline  
Old 11-01-2020, 08:07 PM   #38
McMimmcs
Senior Member
 
McMimmcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Fort Gratiot, Michigan
Posts: 2,296
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by CHuDWah View Post
OTOH, I've seen posts where the wrong word changes the meaning to the exact opposite of what the poster intended.

And with all due respect, lose the bold font in your posts. We get the message without it.
the bold font is for those seniors with diminished eyesight and it will continue.
McMimmcs is offline  
Old 11-01-2020, 09:06 PM   #39
Ruth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Glide, Oregon
Posts: 1,336
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by McMimmcs View Post
the bold font is for those seniors with diminished eyesight and it will continue.
Actually the bold print makes it harder for my poor old eyes to focus on. So I skip over your posts.
__________________
Ruth
"Sometimes you really DO need to read the whole thread"
Ruth is offline  
Old 11-01-2020, 09:31 PM   #40
McMimmcs
Senior Member
 
McMimmcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Fort Gratiot, Michigan
Posts: 2,296
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth View Post
Actually the bold print makes it harder for my poor old eyes to focus on. So I skip over your posts.
If you google the subject matter you will find that bold print on a white background is recommended for older people with diminished sight. So as I said previously I will continue to post in a bold font. .

Last edited by McMimmcs; 11-01-2020 at 09:56 PM.
McMimmcs is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 10:56 AM   #41
katy
Senior Member
 
katy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 5,042
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by updraught View Post
In addition to U.S. production, Buicks were built in Canada through an early agreement with the McLaughlin Carriage Co.
In Canada they were badged "Buick", but the popular name was "McLaughlin Buick".
__________________
If you don't hear a rumor by 10 AM, start one!.
Got my education out behind the barn!
katy is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 11:03 AM   #42
Will N
Senior Member
 
Will N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,101
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by McMimmcs View Post
With all due respect “ Ford Barn “ is not a spelling contest so the vast majority of us could care less whether you dragged or drugged or whatever. We got the message and that’s all that matters!

Oops, you hit another pet peeve! You said you could care less. That means you do care, but you have the ability to decrease the amount of care you have. The correct terminology would be you could not care less. That means that you have the minimum amount of care possible.


Oh, and BTW, I'm just having fun and pulling people's legs with all this.
Will N is online now  
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 11-02-2020, 11:33 AM   #43
Licensed to kill
Senior Member
 
Licensed to kill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Alberta
Posts: 930
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Will N View Post
Oops, you hit another pet peeve! You said you could care less. That means you do care, but you have the ability to decrease the amount of care you have. The correct terminology would be you could not care less. That means that you have the minimum amount of care possible.
Yup, another pet peeve of mine as well.


Quote:
Oh, and BTW, I'm just having fun and pulling people's legs with all this.
Unfortunately, not everyone has a sense of "ha ha". AS I said before, I find it interesting what kinds of things irritate people and admit that some things irritate me, but not in a serious, gonna ruin my way sort of thing, more of an sort of way. Fun stuff.
Licensed to kill is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 11:50 AM   #44
McMimmcs
Senior Member
 
McMimmcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Fort Gratiot, Michigan
Posts: 2,296
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Will N View Post
Oops, you hit another pet peeve! You said you could care less. That means you do care, but you have the ability to decrease the amount of care you have. The correct terminology would be you could not care less. That means that you have the minimum amount of care possible.


Oh, and BTW, I'm just having fun and pulling people's legs with all this.
Most people ( me included ) don’t appreciate your game. It’s not part of Ford Barn.
McMimmcs is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 12:00 PM   #45
Will N
Senior Member
 
Will N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,101
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by McMimmcs View Post
Most people ( me included ) don’t appreciate your game. It’s not part of Ford Barn.

I think people with a sense of humor might appreciated it, and if I post it on Ford Barn, well then, it's part of Ford Barn, isn't it?
Will N is online now  
Old 11-02-2020, 07:24 PM   #46
Durango
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Greenacres, WA
Posts: 87
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
I thought wood spoke wheels were out by 1930??
Durango is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 12:44 AM   #47
CHuDWah
Senior Member
 
CHuDWah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Kritter Krick, Flaw-duh
Posts: 1,158
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by McMimmcs View Post
the bold font is for those seniors with diminished eyesight and it will continue.
As one of those seniors with diminished eyesight, I find your bold font annoying, not helpful.
CHuDWah is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 02:01 AM   #48
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,781
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

I thought wood spoke wheels were out by 1930??



you could add wire wheels in 1930 on Buick, at an additional cost.


In 1931, when the 8 cylinder first came out for Buick, I believe all Buicks had wire wheels.


So I guess Ford was ahead of the curve.
ronn is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 08:13 AM   #49
77Birdman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: North Eastern MD
Posts: 486
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Great looking car! I wish I was a bit more liquid and could help you with your overcrowded A situation!
AND, it looks like an old mill in the background, there must be a crick close by.
77Birdman is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 08:18 AM   #50
McMimmcs
Senior Member
 
McMimmcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Fort Gratiot, Michigan
Posts: 2,296
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by CHuDWah View Post
As one of those seniors with diminished eyesight, I find your bold font annoying, not helpful.
Obviously the solution is quick and easy, don’t read them.
McMimmcs is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 12:21 PM   #51
Licensed to kill
Senior Member
 
Licensed to kill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Alberta
Posts: 930
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Will N View Post
I think people with a sense of humor might appreciated it, and if I post it on Ford Barn, well then, it's part of Ford Barn, isn't it?
I won't pretend to know what others on here think, I can only say that I appreciate a little levity and found your "english lesson" amusing.
Licensed to kill is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 12:24 PM   #52
Licensed to kill
Senior Member
 
Licensed to kill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Alberta
Posts: 930
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by McMimmcs View Post
Obviously the solution is quick and easy, don’t read them.
That is an interesting response from someone that started this by complaining about what someone posted. perhaps you should heed your own advice and allow those of us that appreciate the kinds of posts that got your knickers in a twist enjoy them.
Licensed to kill is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 12:39 PM   #53
McMimmcs
Senior Member
 
McMimmcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Fort Gratiot, Michigan
Posts: 2,296
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Licensed to kill View Post
That is an interesting response from someone that started this by complaining about what someone posted. perhaps you should heed your own advice and allow those of us that appreciate the kinds of posts that got your knickers in a twist enjoy them.
There are many, many members on this site that lack any significant formal education. To ridicule their spelling or grammar will discourage them from posting. That is the last thing we want because many of them have more Model A knowledge than the self professing spelling and grammar experts. Think about it.
McMimmcs is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 01:34 PM   #54
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,781
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Hey Birdman,
I believe that photo was taken by the last owner up above the New Hope area of PA> absolutely beautiful area of PA that has Washingtons Crossing and several covered bridges.


He told me he drove this car around NYC in the past few years, having a place up there...........


Today I am working on the pass door. He had backed up in the garage with the door open- caught the door and now I am enjoying a living hell!


next up is the drivers door- that has rot in the top of the door jam...........
fresh roof vinyl coming this week and then time to take her out for a good run!


weather has warmed up and no more crazy winds......great day here!


regarding the English lessons- guys please lighten up....................
ronn is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 02:19 PM   #55
Mister Moose
Senior Member
 
Mister Moose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Hartford area, CT
Posts: 374
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by McMimmcs View Post
Obviously the solution is quick and easy, don’t read them.
Another solution would be to post in larger font.

A better solution is to adjust the text size in your browser settings.

Back to topic, how about a few more photos, like the interior, dash and engine?

Last edited by Mister Moose; 11-03-2020 at 02:24 PM.
Mister Moose is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 03:05 PM   #56
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,781
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

so I was out there this afternoon attempting to adjust the tweaked door..........


looked down and lower hinge broke off............. hmmm think Ill call Brattons or Snyders..............


well I found a lower chevy hinge that might work, opening a can of worms here.


ready to weld it shut and call it a day!
ronn is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 04:56 PM   #57
Ruth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Glide, Oregon
Posts: 1,336
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by McMimmcs View Post
Obviously the solution is quick and easy, don’t read them.
You're right! I just put you on my ignore list .
__________________
Ruth
"Sometimes you really DO need to read the whole thread"
Ruth is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 05:03 PM   #58
Licensed to kill
Senior Member
 
Licensed to kill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Alberta
Posts: 930
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

This will be my last response to this off topic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by McMimmcs View Post
There are many, many members on this site that lack any significant formal education.
I wasn't aware that you knew so many members here personally and are acutely aware of their education levels.

Quote:
To ridicule their spelling or grammar will discourage them from posting.
Nobody was ridiculing anyone. Personally, if I say something wrong, be it grammar or model A related, I WANT someone to correct me. As uncomfortable as it is to be correct ted online (I know I've been corrected online and it sucks) it FAR outweighs going through life being wrong. It's like walking around with a big booger hanging out of your nose. It's uncomfortable to have it pointed out but that's better than people letting you continue to walk around that way.
Quote:
That is the last thing we want because many of them have more Model A knowledge than the self professing spelling and grammar experts.
So when someone on here corrects someone for a mistaken comment regarding model A's, do you consider them "self professing model A experts"?. I consider them as just someone that knows more than I helping set me straight and i appreciate it. Yes I know the this is the "ford barn" and not the "spelling /grammar Barn" but I am sure that the majority of people would rather be told they have a booger than continue walking around with one, even if the venue they are attending has nothing to do with hygiene.

Quote:
Think about it.
I have, and this is what I came up with. It seems that you have elected yourself the protector of all those that you see as inferior to yourself. You complain about a post that has nothing to do with you and the poster that it was in reference to voiced no such objection. You post in bold when I have yet read anything that suggests that some members eyesight requires it, in fact, when a member WITH limited eyesight states that your bold hinders their ability to read your posts, you brush them off because you know better. There is nothing wrong with coming to someones defence if they give an indication that they require it but it is somewhat sanctimonious to just assume that people require your "help" when none was asked for or even hinted at.
Licensed to kill is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 05:33 PM   #59
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,781
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Im done. this thread wreaks of insanity.............lol!
ronn is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 05:48 PM   #60
30 Closed Cab PU
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,332
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by ronn View Post
Im done. this thread wreaks of insanity.............lol!

Yeah, this thread did go off the rails into an alternate universe.
30 Closed Cab PU is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 06:03 PM   #61
McMimmcs
Senior Member
 
McMimmcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Fort Gratiot, Michigan
Posts: 2,296
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Licensed to kill View Post
This will be my last response to this off topic.


I wasn't aware that you knew so many members here personally and are acutely aware of their education levels.



Nobody was ridiculing anyone. Personally, if I say something wrong, be it grammar or model A related, I WANT someone to correct me. As uncomfortable as it is to be correct ted online (I know I've been corrected online and it sucks) it FAR outweighs going through life being wrong. It's like walking around with a big booger hanging out of your nose. It's uncomfortable to have it pointed out but that's better than people letting you continue to walk around that way.

So when someone on here corrects someone for a mistaken comment regarding model A's, do you consider them "self professing model A experts"?. I consider them as just someone that knows more than I helping set me straight and i appreciate it. Yes I know the this is the "ford barn" and not the "spelling /grammar Barn" but I am sure that the majority of people would rather be told they have a booger than continue walking around with one, even if the venue they are attending has nothing to do with hygiene.


I have, and this is what I came up with. It seems that you have elected yourself the protector of all those that you see as inferior to yourself. You complain about a post that has nothing to do with you and the poster that it was in reference to voiced no such objection. You post in bold when I have yet read anything that suggests that some members eyesight requires it, in fact, when a member WITH limited eyesight states that your bold hinders their ability to read your posts, you brush them off because you know better. There is nothing wrong with coming to someones defence if they give an indication that they require it but it is somewhat sanctimonious to just assume that people require your "help" when none was asked for or even hinted at.
This is what is referred to as “ Gobbledygook “!
McMimmcs is offline  
Old 11-03-2020, 06:08 PM   #62
McMimmcs
Senior Member
 
McMimmcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Fort Gratiot, Michigan
Posts: 2,296
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth View Post
You're right! I just put you on my ignore list .
I wish to thank you profusely !
McMimmcs is offline  
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 11-03-2020, 06:29 PM   #63
Ryan
Administrator
 
Ryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 670
Default Re: this is what I drug home yesterday- not Ford

Hey y’all... love one another.
__________________
Ryan Cochran*
- www.AtomicIndustry.com
Ryan is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 AM.