Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2015, 09:08 PM   #1
LopezCarguy
Senior Member
 
LopezCarguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Lopez Island, Wa.
Posts: 276
Default Shocks

Do shocks have same resistance up and down, in other words does shock dampen more on up stroke or down stroke??
__________________
The only thing worth learning is what you learn after you know it all !!
LopezCarguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2015, 09:36 PM   #2
RHD
Senior Member
 
RHD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 665
Default Re: Shocks

Hi LopezCarguy.
The original type Houdaille shocks from new would have 10% in one direction (the downward stroke) and 90% the other.
I have tested NOS shocks and found them close to 5/95. Today if you can get a shock to perform at around 25/75 you are doing well. Many of the professionally restored shocks only obtain this resistance.
Best of luck.
Cheers,
Les.
__________________
R.H.D.
Author of Model 'A' Ford technical manuals.
Supplier of good original RHD parts.
RHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 06-18-2015, 04:50 AM   #3
updraught
Senior Member
 
updraught's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,969
Default Re: Shocks

Depends on whether you want a "performance" ride or a smooth ride. "Performance" shocks tend to be stiff in both directions for handling (at the expense of ride).

A "Koni Special D" shock, for example, has almost no resistance on compression (going over a bump), and the rebound is adjustable to "heaps" of resistance.

It is good for controlling a stiff spring as it allows it to compress quickly on a bump. The rebound resistance can then control the rebound (expansion) of the spring to create a smooth ride.

If you adjust the Koni up too much the wheels won't come down fast enough after a bump, and you will feel them leave the road. This is not good and it is then time to back them off a bit ...
updraught is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 08:24 AM   #4
Kurt in NJ
Senior Member
 
Kurt in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,156
Default Re: Shocks

Moving the shock arm up should have much less resistance than moving it down----when I was rebuilding shocks for my car I found that with the adjusting valve closed the 2 foot handle would still move up, but could feel like it was stuck moving the lever down---then I opened the needle valve so it took about 60 seconds to move with about 50 lbs on the handle----there is an article in the model A service bulletins about rebuilding and setting shocks---the 50lbs and 2 foot lever was my interpetation of the tool in the service bulletins
Kurt in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 09:17 AM   #5
fiddlybits
Senior Member
 
fiddlybits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N Illinois
Posts: 447
Default Re: Shocks

Now that everyone has explained how to build the clock in answer to the question "what time is it?"......

No, they do not have the same resistance up and down.

For more information.... see previous posts.
fiddlybits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 10:57 AM   #6
ericr
Senior Member
 
ericr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,542
Default Re: Shocks

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
perhaps I mis-read it but two posts are contradictory as to what stroke requires greater resistance....
ericr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 07:18 PM   #7
updraught
Senior Member
 
updraught's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,969
Default Re: Shocks

Quote:
The original type Houdaille shocks from new would have 10% in one direction (the downward stroke) and 90% the other.
Hey Les,

All my A shocks are like house bricks!

Is this 10% of full resistance on the downward (rebound) stroke?
updraught is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 08:01 PM   #8
Kurt in NJ
Senior Member
 
Kurt in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,156
Default Re: Shocks

When you hit the bump and compress the spring you want the shock to let it move easy --to absorb the bump---after the bump the shock has to slow the rebound of the spring so you don't bounce
Kurt in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 11:07 PM   #9
Mike V. Florida
Senior Member
 
Mike V. Florida's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 14,054
Send a message via AIM to Mike V. Florida
Default Re: Shocks

Quote:
Originally Posted by RHD View Post
Hi LopezCarguy.
The original type Houdaille shocks from new would have 10% in one direction (the downward stroke) and 90% the other.
I have tested NOS shocks and found them close to 5/95. Today if you can get a shock to perform at around 25/75 you are doing well. Many of the professionally restored shocks only obtain this resistance.
Best of luck.
Cheers,
Les.
This is the guy that literally wrote the book on Houdallie shocks.
__________________
What's right about America is that although we have a mess of problems, we have great capacity - intellect and resources - to do some thing about them. - Henry Ford II
Mike V. Florida is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 11:13 PM   #10
Tudortomnz
Senior Member
 
Tudortomnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canterbury, New Zealand
Posts: 1,242
Default Re: Shocks

If you want to know about & work on original Houdaille shocks, Les Pearsons book is invaluable.
Tudortomnz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM.