Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-24-2018, 09:23 AM   #21
rockfla
Senior Member
 
rockfla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,953
Default Re: Anti-Seize Compound Payback Years later

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSeery View Post
Some might find this interesting. It is recommended that torque values be reduced 25%.

http://www.antiseize.com/PDFs/torque_specifications.pdf

http://www.unlimited-usa.com/ftpgetfile.php?id=29
That would follow suit across the board for Grd2 (A307), Grd 5 and Grd 8, There are torque charts on the web, I believe I posted one on a previous post!!!
rockfla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2018, 10:43 AM   #22
Zephyr Q
Member
 
Zephyr Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: The City of Angels, CA
Posts: 62
Default Re: Anti-Seize Compound Payback Years later

I've pulled the pumps on my V-12 and I could not remember this "hidden" bolt you all are talking about so I googled some images of the V-8 pump. Wow... that was an interesting design decision, glad that bit of ingenuity didn't transfer to Lincoln.
Zephyr Q is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 04-24-2018, 02:09 PM   #23
Oakhurst
Senior Member
 
Oakhurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Oakhurst, CA
Posts: 140
Cool Re: Anti-Seize Compound Payback Years later

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSeery View Post
Some might find this interesting. It is recommended that torque values be reduced 25%.

http://www.antiseize.com/PDFs/torque_specifications.pdf

http://www.unlimited-usa.com/ftpgetfile.php?id=29
Reading this several times, when it defines "lubricants" it does not include
"anti seize" It is just obviously considered a lubricant? The fact that is not listed
has me wondering.
Oakhurst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2018, 06:39 PM   #24
JSeery
Member Emeritus
 
JSeery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
Default Re: Anti-Seize Compound Payback Years later

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oakhurst View Post
Reading this several times, when it defines "lubricants" it does not include
"anti seize" It is just obviously considered a lubricant? The fact that is not listed
has me wondering.
There is a lot of information on this to be found on the internet if you are interested. From some of the clamping force testing that has been done anti-seize is a bigger deal than something like oil, meaning the torque has to be reduced more with anti-seize to prevent over torqueing. I has seen suggestions of 35 to 50% reduction required. This is one of those subject like oil additivities where everyone is going to have a different post of view. The point is keep the anti-seize off of anything requiring critical torque values, such as rod bolts/nuts, head bolts, main bolts/nuts, etc.
JSeery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2018, 07:08 PM   #25
Ronnie
Senior Member
 
Ronnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada Where it snows
Posts: 2,058
Default Re: Anti-Seize Compound Payback Years later

Another read
http://www.na.henkel-adhesives.com/u...994_LT6734.pdf

R
Ronnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2018, 09:02 AM   #26
19Fordy
Senior Member
 
19Fordy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,942
Default Re: Anti-Seize Compound Payback Years later

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Ronnie, Thanks. Very enlightening.
19Fordy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM.