|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-23-2013, 10:20 PM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,526
|
Re: What is the story with this flathead block? Raised intake area
Quote:
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:30 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nor*Cal
Posts: 720
|
Re: What is the story with this flathead block? Raised intake area
I didn't feel like pulling the heads off my perfectly running 41 motor, i saw on van pelts site that fords in this year were green and mercs were blue. I very carefully scraped some of the now black paint off (a few different spots on the motor itself as well as the back of the crank pulley) and i see blue. Can anyone confim this?
__________________
Throttle Benders Est. 1949
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
01-24-2013, 08:05 PM | #43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,006
|
Re: What is the story with this flathead block? Raised intake area
Quote:
My belief is Ford did not want this unofficial "swap" becoming public knowledge and thus, would have "disguised" the Merc engines by painting them green. While I realize this may clash with common sense wisdom, that's what the research had shown to be the case. In 1940 the installation of Merc engines in Ford cars was NOT officially sanctioned by the company. Still, they did allow it to happen on an unofficial basis. To obtain such an installation, a request seeking permission had to be made by a police department, sheriff, fire marshal, etc. on official letterhead. I can't speak with absolute authority for 1941. It appears sometime during the '41 production the installation of Merc engines in to Fords was approved by the company. Whether or not the company continued their effort to disguise the engines is at this pint open to speculation.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
|
01-24-2013, 08:42 PM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 129
|
Re: What is the story with this flathead block? Raised intake area
The 59 is cast into the top of the bellhousing. More likely yours has 99 or 95 on the bellhousing. I have one that looks just like yours and it has 95 on it. Mine is 3 3/16 bore.
Neal [/QUOTE] |
01-24-2013, 09:00 PM | #45 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nor*Cal
Posts: 720
|
Re: What is the story with this flathead block? Raised intake area
Quote:
mine doesnt have a 59 a 99 or a 95 it has like a 5 digit number a an x like 18042 X
__________________
Throttle Benders Est. 1949
|
|
01-24-2013, 09:45 PM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,526
|
Re: What is the story with this flathead block? Raised intake area
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
01-25-2013, 09:40 AM | #47 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: What is the story with this flathead block? Raised intake area
Early US 99's had the designation STAMPED up front, later prewar engines were entirely without external mark...supposedly they dropped the stamping when 239's went to blue paint to avoid assembly line confusion!
Canadian engines were well marked, with designation cast into block up front. |
01-25-2013, 02:12 PM | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kansas
Posts: 334
|
Re: What is the story with this flathead block? Raised intake area
This came with a 221 bore,Post WWII block,raised manifold surface,Round water hole,59 cast on bell housing. Very thick cylinder walls. Is now 239 bore with room for more.
__________________
[QUO[/QUOTE]no matter where you are,or where you're at, there you are... |
01-25-2013, 08:23 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Gardiner Me.
Posts: 4,200
|
Re: What is the story with this flathead block? Raised intake area
dude, That engine looks like a new one for me. I have had a few blocks with the 59 cast on the bell and 3-1/16 bore, but not with the raised intake, and I cain't remember if it passed the pencel test, your's look like it will hold the pencel on front like earlier engines. Walt
|
01-26-2013, 12:14 AM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 258
|
Re: What is the story with this flathead block? Raised intake area
Dude, unique flat block! Did it have 221 small rod journal crank/rods? 2 pre-war
features 41 raised intake deck & pencil lip front. Others? Pan rail casting cores/with 2 ridges on each side of block?--- Flat block sides with raised exhaust port pads? --or bowed convex sides from exh port surface to port surface? Good pictures--thanks! Gene Tulsa |
01-26-2013, 12:40 AM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 258
|
Re: What is the story with this flathead block? Raised intake area
Dude,
My question re the block sides between exhaust port surfaces should be -is it bowed in (concave not convex). There have been previous posts about a C59A Canadian block that had several pre-war external casting features. Like to see pictures of that block. Those C59A pictures are stated to be on Jalopy Journal. I have trouble finding those pics / using that site --any tips? Gene |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|