Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Late V8 (1954+)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2018, 11:19 PM   #1
zuburg
Senior Member
 
zuburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 332
Default Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderbird?

Has anyone had any experience with the electronic ignition distributor shown in the link below on a 1956 Thunderbird? I'm guessing it would not work with the teapot carb? Would it work with a 1957 or later carb?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/FORD-Y-BLOC...19.m1438.l2649
zuburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 12:25 AM   #2
dmsfrr
Senior Member
 
dmsfrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Abq, NM
Posts: 3,598
Default Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

You are correct. It's built to work with a '57 or newer carburetor.
dmsfrr is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 03-22-2018, 03:47 AM   #3
KULTULZ
Senior Member
 
KULTULZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: IN A 'GALAXIE' FAR FAR AWAY
Posts: 6,413
Post Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

Amazing they don't mention that little factoid isn't it?

Wonder how many buy this system and the car won't run correctly?
__________________
*****

- DISCLAIMER -

The above posted information is in my opinion only (IMO) and may contain copy and paste material(s).

In addition, any above tech information is supplied in good faith. No responsibility implied or otherwise can be accepted for the way others use or interpret provided data.

Your experience(s), opinion(s) and mileage may vary.

DIAGNOSED CDO - (OCD In Correct Alphabetical Order)
KULTULZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 08:40 AM   #4
Ole Don
Senior Member
 
Ole Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: St. Michael, Minnesota
Posts: 1,713
Default Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

I would think that distributor would work with any carb. Just use manifold vacuum. Am I wrong?
Ole Don is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 09:46 AM   #5
dmsfrr
Senior Member
 
dmsfrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Abq, NM
Posts: 3,598
Default Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ole Don View Post
I would think that distributor would work with any carb. Just use manifold vacuum. Am I wrong?
A quote from the link below...

"what you're suggesting will do the opposite what you want. When you open the throttle manifold vacuum will drop off, decreasing advance.
The ported vacuum will increase as you open the throttle and continue to increase as the flow thru the carb increases. giving you full advance."


https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=192905

The (single chambered) vacuum advance canister on a distributor connects to a designated fitting on the carburetor.

An oem '56 dual canister distributor has two vacuum lines, one connects to the carb, the other to manifold vacuum. The only one I'm aware of that connects to the intake manifold.

.

Last edited by dmsfrr; 03-22-2018 at 02:28 PM.
dmsfrr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 11:12 AM   #6
scicala
Senior Member
 
scicala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit suburb, MI
Posts: 3,697
Default Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
At that low price it's almost a guarantee that it's Chinese manufactured garbage for the American market.


Sal
scicala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 01:40 PM   #7
KULTULZ
Senior Member
 
KULTULZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: IN A 'GALAXIE' FAR FAR AWAY
Posts: 6,413
Post Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ole Don View Post

I would think that distributor would work with any carb. Just use manifold vacuum. Am I wrong?
Well yes, but the problem is you will have full vacuum advance @ idle and part throttle (pinging). You would have to modify the system.

GM uses (did) this system in a lot of applications,
__________________
*****

- DISCLAIMER -

The above posted information is in my opinion only (IMO) and may contain copy and paste material(s).

In addition, any above tech information is supplied in good faith. No responsibility implied or otherwise can be accepted for the way others use or interpret provided data.

Your experience(s), opinion(s) and mileage may vary.

DIAGNOSED CDO - (OCD In Correct Alphabetical Order)
KULTULZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 01:41 PM   #8
KULTULZ
Senior Member
 
KULTULZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: IN A 'GALAXIE' FAR FAR AWAY
Posts: 6,413
Thumbs up Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

Quote:
Originally Posted by scicala View Post

At that low price it's almost a guarantee that it's Chinese manufactured garbage for the American market.

Sal
Yep, another crushed Sherman Tank brought back...
__________________
*****

- DISCLAIMER -

The above posted information is in my opinion only (IMO) and may contain copy and paste material(s).

In addition, any above tech information is supplied in good faith. No responsibility implied or otherwise can be accepted for the way others use or interpret provided data.

Your experience(s), opinion(s) and mileage may vary.

DIAGNOSED CDO - (OCD In Correct Alphabetical Order)
KULTULZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 03:00 PM   #9
Crankster
Senior Member
 
Crankster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 563
Default Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

Quote:
Originally Posted by KULTULZ View Post
Well yes, but the problem is you will have full vacuum advance @ idle and part throttle (pinging). You would have to modify the system.
Not really, it is a myth that there is any appreciable difference between "ported" and manifold vacuum in terms of the distributor advance at anything other than idle, and at idle there is no load so ping or knock is not a factor. In all other respects the distributor advance (or retard) is exactly the same.

Maximum vacuum advance at idle does have certain advantages, lower engine temperatures. Unfortunately a direct manifold connection also increases NOX emissions. Another myth is that "ported" vacuum was a smog era invention, it was touted at least as far back as 1930s publications as a way to ensure a steady smooth idle - exactly what the modern tuner will find today.
Crankster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 03:33 PM   #10
dmsfrr
Senior Member
 
dmsfrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Abq, NM
Posts: 3,598
Default Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankster View Post
Not really, it is a myth that there is any appreciable difference between "ported" and manifold vacuum in terms of the distributor advance at anything other than idle, and at idle there is no load so ping or knock is not a factor. In all other respects the distributor advance (or retard) is exactly the same.
I'm trying to understand, not sound argumentative...

If there isn't that much difference why did Ford and Holley, Autolite (etc.) go to so much design and engineering expense over several years changing and upgrading carbs and distributor advance... if straight manifold vacuum would have worked in the first place?
Is it for reduced emissions and improved fuel economy? or ?
dmsfrr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 06:43 PM   #11
KULTULZ
Senior Member
 
KULTULZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: IN A 'GALAXIE' FAR FAR AWAY
Posts: 6,413
Post Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankster View Post

Not really, it is a myth that there is any appreciable difference between "ported" and manifold vacuum in terms of the distributor advance at anything other than idle...
You forgot to add IMO...
__________________
*****

- DISCLAIMER -

The above posted information is in my opinion only (IMO) and may contain copy and paste material(s).

In addition, any above tech information is supplied in good faith. No responsibility implied or otherwise can be accepted for the way others use or interpret provided data.

Your experience(s), opinion(s) and mileage may vary.

DIAGNOSED CDO - (OCD In Correct Alphabetical Order)
KULTULZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 10:49 PM   #12
Crankster
Senior Member
 
Crankster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 563
Default Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmsfrr View Post
I'm trying to understand, not sound argumentative...

If there isn't that much difference why did Ford and Holley, Autolite (etc.) go to so much design and engineering expense over several years changing and upgrading carbs and distributor advance... if straight manifold vacuum would have worked in the first place?
Is it for reduced emissions and improved fuel economy? or ?
No that's fine, keep in mind the Loadomatic (Ford) distributor is a separate deal altogether and just confuses things even further. It has no mechanical advance mechanism, it is exclusively operated by vacuum(s) from two different sources from a special proprietary carburetor. This is why there is a performance problem when someone installs a different carburetor on an engine that included the loadomatic. Another issue I believe Ford went to a 1/4" hex drive for the distributor shaft after '56. As far as standard type dual unit distributor using mechanical weights and vacuum advance I'm not sure exactly why different manufacturers used different methods.

"Ported" manifold was utilized/invented because it allows for a steady idle, and long before any pollution controls were ever dreamed of. There is probably more misconception about distributors and ignition timing than anything I can think of, and especially vacuum advance. It's often found disconnected because the tuner doesn't understand it, or "curving". Part of the problem too is so many components and methods (and marketing) geared towards drag racing are mistakenly employed by people who only and ever drive on the street. Huge carburetors and intake plenums, rumpety-rumpety cams and racing distributors are made for high RPM and high speed only, and won't idle well or handle nicely tooling around town.

A mechanics vacuum gauge plumbed into the cabin will illustrate how engine vacuum fluctuates wildly and quickly under different engine load conditions. That's the key to understanding vacuum advance (or retard); the mechanical weights or centrifugal distributor advance is RPM only, vacuum advance is load dependent, they are completely independent of each other. If you were to connect two vacuum gauges, one to manifold, and one to "ported" they would read exactly the same cruising down the highway. Thus the advance at the distributor would be the same.

At idle 30° or more BTDC tends to cause alarm, but there is no load on the engine. And as soon as there is, the vacuum goes away. Most engine tuners recommend a stock engine be connected to "ported" while a modified street engine will prefer being connected to a straight manifold source, mainly for the reasons mentioned.
Crankster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2018, 08:48 AM   #13
Ole Don
Senior Member
 
Ole Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: St. Michael, Minnesota
Posts: 1,713
Default Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

At idle 30° or more BTDC tends to cause alarm, but there is no load on the engine. And as soon as there is, the vacuum goes away. Most engine tuners recommend a stock engine be connected to "ported" while a modified street engine will prefer being connected to a straight manifold source, mainly for the reasons mentioned.
This is why it worked so well for me, my 312 had higher compression, big valves, an Isky cam and other goodies. At idle, it had a bunch of advance, and while opening the throttle, both vacuum and advance would drop significantly. It needed 89 octane all the time, and 91 or 93 if I raced. It would eat orange 350's for breakfast. It was a fun car.
Ole Don is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2018, 11:00 AM   #14
dmsfrr
Senior Member
 
dmsfrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Abq, NM
Posts: 3,598
Default Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

Very informative,THANKS!
dmsfrr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2018, 09:05 PM   #15
paul2748
Senior Member
 
paul2748's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Midland Park, NJ
Posts: 3,965
Default Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

While you kids have your meltdown, I have a Pertronix II in my 57 distributor and it works very nicely. One trip to the west coast (from the east coast) and a lot of other shorter trips and it has worked very well.
__________________
48 Ford Conv
56 Tbird
54 Ford Victoria
paul2748 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2018, 11:56 AM   #16
Ole Don
Senior Member
 
Ole Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: St. Michael, Minnesota
Posts: 1,713
Smile Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ole Don View Post
At idle 30° or more BTDC tends to cause alarm, but there is no load on the engine. And as soon as there is, the vacuum goes away. Most engine tuners recommend a stock engine be connected to "ported" while a modified street engine will prefer being connected to a straight manifold source, mainly for the reasons mentioned.
This is why it worked so well for me, my 312 had higher compression, big valves, an Isky cam and other goodies. At idle, it had a bunch of advance, and while opening the throttle, both vacuum and advance would drop significantly. It needed 89 octane all the time, and 91 or 93 if I raced. It would eat orange 350's for breakfast. It was a fun car.
Let me add one very important clue as to why my motors ran so well. I mailed two 57 type distributors to Bubba's Hot Rod Shop in Indy for a custom curve. Both of my good engines had one. One motor had cast flat top pistons, and rods with polished beams. This one was shifted at 5800 to 6000. The other motor had forged pop up pistons, on aftermarket rods, an Isky 505T cam, that one was shifted at 7,000 to 7200 RPMs. Both had a Pertronix. I was told after the fact that when I ran the one mile at Bonneville, everything stopped so they could listen to me. I was busy trying to keep the rear behind the front. It got loose about 120.
Ole Don is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 06:22 AM   #17
Hot Rod Reverend
Senior Member
 
Hot Rod Reverend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Loveland, Ohio
Posts: 915
Default Re: Anyone have experience with this electronic ignition distributor on 1956 Thunderb

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul2748 View Post
While you kids have your meltdown, I have a Pertronix II in my 57 distributor and it works very nicely. One trip to the west coast (from the east coast) and a lot of other shorter trips and it has worked very well.
I must be missing something here on the "meltdown"...looks like Crankster has been banned. I looked back through his posts on other threads and I guess this thread did him in?
__________________
Lancaster, California
Visit hotrodreverend.com to view hundreds of pictures and videos of the build of the 1955 Ford Club Sedan!
Hot Rod Reverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.