Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-08-2023, 10:01 PM   #1
petehoovie
Senior Member
 
petehoovie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 8,063
Default Critique this '34

Many pictures here > https://www.hemmings.com/auction/193...er-475545/sold

__________________
The only thing nice about being imperfect is the joy it brings to others....

"Silver rings, your butt! Them's washers!"
"We shot our way out of that town for a dollar's worth of steel holes!" - from 'The Wild Bunch' - 1969

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NReUd2_0u0
petehoovie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2023, 10:07 PM   #2
38 coupe
Senior Member
 
38 coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,629
Default Re: Critique this '34

That doesn't look like near 100k to me, but then again I don't have near 100k to spend on anything so it doesn't really matter.
First quick note is the wrong fuel pump. Others who are more knowledgeable on 34 Fords will likely notice other things.
38 coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 03-09-2023, 12:00 AM   #3
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,090
Default Re: Critique this '34

Based on the Early Ford V8 Club judging standards, if the new owner of this coupe were to enter it for judging at a national meet and it was judged accurately and fairly, it would fall below the 950 minimum point threshold for a Dearborn award scoring about 940 points. The big deductions would be for the upholstery in the front (wrong material, wrong color) and in the rumble compartment (wrong color), followed by the wood graining (right color, wrong pattern), spark plugs, front spring clamp, muffler, finish on grille bars, heavy pitting on the underside of all four fenders, wrong fuel/air lines (not siamesed), fuel pump, and wrong finish on the underside of the running boards.


Still, it is a nice car and it would be welcome in my garage. Worth $94K? I don't think so.

Last edited by DavidG; 03-09-2023 at 08:18 AM. Reason: error
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 01:32 AM   #4
Lawrie
Senior Member
 
Lawrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Qld, Australia
Posts: 4,210
Default Re: Critique this '34

Also , its got the steering on the wrong side,
LOL
Lawrie
Lawrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 08:06 AM   #5
rockfla
Senior Member
 
rockfla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,944
Default Re: Critique this '34

Thank you for the lesson in "detail" David. Always teaches me to slow down and look harder!!!! The fuel pump was a glaring one, the spark plugs, for me, not as much!!!!
rockfla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 08:39 AM   #6
Oldbluoval
Senior Member
 
Oldbluoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Signal Mtn, TN (SE TN)
Posts: 2,368
Default Re: Critique this '34

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
I must defer to David G…but…
Always a “but”…thats just what they go for! Granted the market is a bit soft right now.
Willing buyer/willing seller met!
Oldbluoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 09:20 AM   #7
Tim Ayers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,177
Default Re: Critique this '34

I am not anywhere near being in the world of Dearborn judging, but I do find it interesting that David G mentioned how points are deducted for pitting on the underside of the fenders.

Eventually, the supply of perfect or very good OEM fenders is going to dry up.

Would it be better, for judging purposes, to use aftermarket sheet metal and do the work to make them look/fit like OEM or do your best to fix an OEM fender with pitting?
Tim Ayers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 09:30 AM   #8
rockfla
Senior Member
 
rockfla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,944
Default Re: Critique this '34

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Ayers View Post
I am not anywhere near being in the world of Dearborn judging, but I do find it interesting that David G mentioned how points are deducted for pitting on the underside of the fenders.

Eventually, the supply of perfect or very good OEM fenders is going to dry up.

Would it be better, for judging purposes, to use aftermarket sheet metal and do the work to make them look/fit like OEM or do your best to fix an OEM fender with pitting?
OR how about doing a little filler work and smoothing them out before painting and priming......It looks like a lot of effort was made to do a good job on the car.....IT wouldn't take much to "FINISH" the job!!!!
rockfla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 09:31 AM   #9
Seth Swoboda
Senior Member
 
Seth Swoboda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,778
Default Re: Critique this '34

Want to have more fun? Critique this car.
https://bringatrailer.com/listing/19...-window-coupe/
Seth Swoboda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 09:34 AM   #10
mhsprecher
Senior Member
 
mhsprecher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Takoma Park, MD
Posts: 2,817
Default Re: Critique this '34

It sold yesterday for $94K! Holy moly! After 32's the 34's are the holy grail of early Fords, in my opinion.

It's good they provided a lot of pics. It helps make an informed decision. Pet peeve: I hate it when they take pics with the reflection of the photographer in the shot. Can't be avoided sometimes, but in many cases it can be.
__________________
1924 Model T Coupe
1928 Model A Roadster
1930 Model A Town Sedan
1939 Deluxe Fordor
1945 pickup
1951 Custom convertible

Last edited by mhsprecher; 03-09-2023 at 09:47 AM. Reason: Add more nonsense.
mhsprecher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 09:48 AM   #11
rockfla
Senior Member
 
rockfla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,944
Default Re: Critique this '34

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth Swoboda View Post
Want to have more fun? Critique this car.
https://bringatrailer.com/listing/19...-window-coupe/
I'll start
Wrong, Intake manifold, fuel pump, carburetor, air breather, NO engine tins, crank hole cover on the grill, fuel "lines" ALL..THUS I would imagine you have NO fuel gauge, cutout "finish", appears to have bolts on the dog bones, cannot tell for sure BUT the front springs appears from what I can see is a 34?? Radiator hose clamps, oil pan should be black, "V8" emblem is too low, rumble seat interior is wrong color, rumble seat floor mat. Wind wings, spark plugs, front bumper looks to be 34, valve stems and appears to have NO valve stem on the spare tire to tell IF its mounted correctly. Painted dash and trim, gas tank should be black, all kinds of modern plated bolts, nuts & washers on front fender mounting, wrong spare tire hub cap, no paint on the V8's on the car.

Last edited by rockfla; 03-09-2023 at 10:39 AM. Reason: additions
rockfla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 10:14 AM   #12
Tim Ayers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,177
Default Re: Critique this '34

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockfla View Post
OR how about doing a little filler work and smoothing them out before painting and priming......It looks like a lot of effort was made to do a good job on the car.....IT wouldn't take much to "FINISH" the job!!!!
For a $94K car, I agree 100%. I have a pet peeve for things such hose clamps and other fasteners.

Not sure why, but my I gets drawn to them immediately.

For the underside of fenders, I guess the previous owner had to make a decision as to how far he wanted to go.

I can only assume when faced with the estimate of how much extra it was going to cost of finishing the underside of the fenders, he decided not to.
Tim Ayers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 10:21 AM   #13
Seth Swoboda
Senior Member
 
Seth Swoboda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,778
Default Re: Critique this '34

We're being more particular than the average person, however for the money these guys are asking for these two cars, they better be concourse correct for me.
Seth Swoboda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 10:36 AM   #14
rockfla
Senior Member
 
rockfla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,944
Default Re: Critique this '34

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth Swoboda View Post
We're being more particular than the average person, however for the money these guys are asking for these two cars, they better be concourse correct for me.
X2 for me too Seth, especially since on the 34 they are tripping all over themselves with the promotion of the awards it garnered, sadly an EFV8 Club "Dearborn" among them!!

Last edited by rockfla; 03-09-2023 at 10:41 AM.
rockfla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 11:26 AM   #15
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,090
Default Re: Critique this '34

I'm not sure that the former or new owner would ever enter that '33 coupe to be judged, except perhaps to help develop a to-do list for its proper restoration. If it were mine, I would remove the body from the frame and first establish the condition of the frame in the sides where the rear X member arms join the side rails. It would be unusual for a frame with that degree of pitting not to have serious rust issues in those two areas. The pitting on the under body and on the frame would have to be removed. The heavy pitting on the axles would be a challenge as to rid the pitting there would end up with them being over-restored.

As Robert notes, the engine compartment is a mess, from the spark plugs, their wires, the heads, the engine pans, the oil pan, the fuel and gauge air lines, the intake manifold and just about everything attached to it.

The upholstery in the front compartment is okay assuming it is a true Bedford cord (can't tell for sure from the photos), but that in the rumble compartment is way off color wise. There's no wood graining and the finish on the instrument panel is terrible. It has a '34 ammeter, not a '33. The plating on the shift lever and hand brake is incorrect. There should be no boot on top of the shift lever housing and spring clips to retain the floor mat around the opening in the center of the floor are missing. The molding around the top insert appears to be something other than the original.

The rumble lid set up is that of a roadster with the latch handle on the lid, not remotely controlled from inside as it should be in a '33-'34 coupe. The hood tops seems to want to wave at you when you walk by.

The battery carrier is a mess. The bars on the grille are both pitted and the wrong finish (and the V8 emblem is misplaced). The ring on the spare tire cover is that of a '34, not that of a '33. No double WSW tires and no front axle bumper. Dozens and dozens of incorrect fasteners, at least as to their finish.

Those are just the obvious high (low) lights. No doubt there are more.
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 12:28 PM   #16
rockfla
Senior Member
 
rockfla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,944
Default Re: Critique this '34

David
Is the front bumper NOT 34??? Bolt spacing?? Shouldn't the 33 bolts fall somewhere in a relative line between the grill sides and the horn??? 34's outboard of the outside edges of the horns??
rockfla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 01:01 PM   #17
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,090
Default Re: Critique this '34

Robert,


That was my initial reaction as well, but I think that the camera is misleading here. If you look closely and image '34 bumper guards on the bumper, they would be tilted to the center because of the beginning of the dip in the bumper. Also, the overhead view suggests that the inner front bumper brackets are '33s and not '34s.
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 02:35 PM   #18
T Scott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East Boothbay, Maine
Posts: 276
Default Re: Critique this '34

The visors with the single swivel hinge on one side, is that correct or was that unique to the 3 window as opposed to the 5 window?
T Scott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 03:40 PM   #19
the.secret.victoria
Junior Member
 
the.secret.victoria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 22
Default Re: Critique this '34

Aren't the rumble seat cars supposed to have a cloth circular cover over the rear axle rather than a steel cover? It appears both these cars have steel covers.
__________________
WTB '33 Ford parts:
* Sedan/Victoria front seat adjuster mechanism
* Sedan/Victoria rear seat catch pieces (B-192921 and B-192964)
* Sedan or Victoria roof tack strip (OEM or aftermarket)
* Straight commercial (pickup) bumper '33/'34 or '35 (46-17757 or 68-17757)
the.secret.victoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 04:18 PM   #20
deuce lover
Senior Member
 
deuce lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,301
Default Re: Critique this '34

Quote:
Originally Posted by T Scott View Post
The visors with the single swivel hinge on one side, is that correct or was that unique to the 3 window as opposed to the 5 window?
TMK all 34 deluxe's had the single swivel hinge sunvisors.A '34 Vic I restored in 1969 had them.
deuce lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 AM.