Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2019, 12:07 AM   #1
Tom Endy
Senior Member
 
Tom Endy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,131
Default 1932 drive shaft

I am in the process of rebuilding a rear axle assembly removed from a 1932 V8 Ford Tudor. When I got it apart I discovered the drive shaft in the photo. It has a hollow 1 & 3\4" tube welded over a smaller solid drive shaft. The torque tube and the drive shaft are about three inches longer than a Model A.

I believe that the rear has never been apart before as I found original bearings and races with the Ford logo on them along with the original Ford part number. The three grease seals were original leather seals (completely shot).

I have heard stories that the original Model A drive shaft did not work well in the 1932 V8's, as they had a tendency to "whip" due to the high torque of the engine.

Could anyone who has experience with 1932 V8 rear axle assemblies confirm that the drive shaft shown here is original Ford and not an after-thought modification.

Tom Endy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1932 drive shaft.jpg (69.7 KB, 149 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN0310.jpg (53.4 KB, 191 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN0314.jpg (65.5 KB, 139 views)
Tom Endy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2019, 04:08 AM   #2
quickchange
Senior Member
 
quickchange's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nelson. New Zealand
Posts: 2,008
Default Re: 1932 drive shaft

looks like the one I have here, so think correct for early 32 which has ring &pinion same as an A
quickchange is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 06-06-2019, 08:23 AM   #3
jw hash
Senior Member
 
jw hash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auburn Washington
Posts: 2,552
Default Re: 1932 drive shaft

I have two early 32`s and that is the shaft that is in them.
jw hash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2019, 08:55 AM   #4
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,422
Default Re: 1932 drive shaft

The solid shafts become more unstable to torsional forces the longer they get. The tubular design solved the initial problem when the Model B came out for 1932 but it was changed later on when it too started to be problematic. Ford started using a divergent/convergent or sort of a double conical rhombus shaped tubular shaft for several years in the late 30s but eventually decided to go back to a solid shaft with a damper bearing secured to the inside of the torque tube in the approximate middle of the shaft to do away with the problems of torsional whipping. They were certainly much less expensive to produce that way.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2019, 09:01 AM   #5
hop up
Senior Member
 
hop up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 411
Default Re: 1932 drive shaft

That is the shaft that is in my 32 and have no issues
__________________
Wanted flathead speed equipment Thanks
hop up is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2019, 11:25 AM   #6
Jim Brierley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,085
Default Re: 1932 drive shaft

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
It is original, later shafts till maybe '37 (?) were tubular but tapered in shape, many of those were used by those blankety-blank hot rodders as header pipes, very beautiful!
Jim Brierley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2019, 11:47 AM   #7
Tom Endy
Senior Member
 
Tom Endy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,131
Default Re: 1932 drive shaft

Many thanks to those that responded. The ring & pinion found in this rear axle assembly is a 433:1 ratio, 39 teeth on the ring, 9 on the pinion. It will be replaced with a 354:1 gear set. Photo shows the 433.

Tom Endy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCN0305.jpg (76.9 KB, 93 views)
Tom Endy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2019, 04:33 PM   #8
john in illinois
Senior Member
 
john in illinois's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,183
Default Re: 1932 drive shaft

I rebuilt the rear end on a friends model B. It took a strong puller to remove the pinion gear from the tubular shaft. Was original from 32.

John
__________________
Welcome each day
john in illinois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2019, 05:13 PM   #9
Tom Endy
Senior Member
 
Tom Endy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,131
Default Re: 1932 drive shaft

Quote:
Originally Posted by john in illinois View Post
I rebuilt the rear end on a friends model B. It took a strong puller to remove the pinion gear from the tubular shaft. Was original from 32.

John
I was not able to use my Model A pinion puller because of the large diameter drive shaft. I had to improvise. I used a large bearing puller and a couple of bolts. I was able to get the puller up against where the tube is welded on. By tightening the two bolts against the back plate of my Model A puller, the whole pinion assembly came right out.

Tom Endy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCN0301.jpg (63.5 KB, 60 views)
Tom Endy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2019, 07:58 PM   #10
briphaeton
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 241
Default Re: 1932 drive shaft

Could those gears be used in a Model A banjo?
Brian
briphaeton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2019, 09:18 PM   #11
Tom Endy
Senior Member
 
Tom Endy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,131
Default Re: 1932 drive shaft

Quote:
Originally Posted by briphaeton View Post
Could those gears be used in a Model A banjo?
Brian
They can be used in a Model A. The 32 rear axle assembly they came out of is about 85% Model A. The carrier, spider gears, and axles are the same as a Model A.

A 411:1 gear ratio is too low for a Model A today. A 433:1 is even lower.

Tom Endy
Tom Endy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2019, 09:33 PM   #12
Bob C
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,741
Default Re: 1932 drive shaft

4.33 maybe good for hill climb guys.
Bob C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2019, 11:46 PM   #13
larrys40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: St Charles , Missouri
Posts: 1,998
Default Re: 1932 drive shaft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Endy View Post
I was not able to use my Model A pinion puller because of the large diameter drive shaft. I had to improvise. I used a large bearing puller and a couple of bolts. I was able to get the puller up against where the tube is welded on. By tightening the two bolts against the back plate of my Model A puller, the whole pinion assembly came right out.

Tom Endy
Tom,
I just did one and am in the process of wrapping it up.
I concur witj the guys on the driveshaft. There were different varieties up to 36 with the 37 using the intermediate bearing.

If you can get a Krw Aata puller you will find it useful.
Larry shepard
larrys40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2019, 11:37 AM   #14
briphaeton
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 241
Default Re: 1932 drive shaft

I was thinking Hill Climb.
briphaeton is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 AM.