Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-2021, 02:46 PM   #1
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,732
Default 59AB sonic test. Good or bad?

Hello. I just ran a sonic test on a 59AB block.
Here are the numbers. I don't know if they are good or bad.
If anyone with experience in these matters could cast an eye over the numbers that would be great. I have listed the theoretical numbers if the bore were taken .125" over. Do these look ok? Thinnest sections are marked in orange.

Thanks in advance. Mart.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg 59absonictest.jpg (78.8 KB, 249 views)
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2021, 03:11 PM   #2
51 MERC-CT
Senior Member
 
51 MERC-CT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Hartford, Ct
Posts: 5,898
Default Re: 59AB sonic test. Good or bad?

Check this thread-----


https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showt...7043&showall=1
__________________
DON'T RECALL DOING SOMETHING FOR MYSELF BASED ON SOMEONE ELSE'S LIKES OR DISLIKES
51 MERC-CT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-19-2021, 03:13 PM   #3
deuce_roadster
Senior Member
 
deuce_roadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Shelton, WA
Posts: 3,777
Default Re: 59AB sonic test. Good or bad?

Depends on how much it needs to be bored. My machinist insists on a minimum of .100 wall thickness left after boring. Others may have different values. Also what are you doing with the motor. If you were putting a blower on it, you would probably want a little more meat there. These values have worked well for me as I have 5 early Fords with engines bored by this man that are all drivers, the oldest (my avatar) has been on the road since 2000.
deuce_roadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2021, 03:19 PM   #4
Ronnieroadster
Senior Member
 
Ronnieroadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,508
Default Re: 59AB sonic test. Good or bad?

Mart not much to worry about the block bored .125 over will handle at least 8 pounds of boost with out any trouble.
Ronnieroadster
__________________
I use the F word a lot no not that word these words Flathead , Focus and Finish.
"Life Member of the Bonneville 200 MPH Club using a Ford Flathead block"
Owner , Builder, Driver of the First Ford Flathead bodied roadster to run 200 MPH Record July 13, 2018 LTA timing association 200.921 in one and a half miles burning gasoline.
First ever gas burning Ford flathead powered roadster to run 200 MPH at Bonneville Salt Flats setting the record August 7th 2021 at 205.744 MPH
Ronnieroadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2021, 04:04 PM   #5
Kube
Senior Member
 
Kube's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 8,935
Default Re: 59AB sonic test. Good or bad?

Mart, I'd done a few blocks in the past with less meat remaining than you are looking at. I'd never had an issue.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you".
Kube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2021, 04:17 PM   #6
frnkeore
Senior Member
 
frnkeore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 782
Default Re: 59AB sonic test. Good or bad?

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
I also agree that .100 walls are ok and you will safe at .120.

Although sonic testing was not available in the 50's & '60's I think a lot of guy's got away with ~.090. I know the most common over bore was 3.375 back then. I had a '48 Merc bored 3/16 and most of the hot FH's were 3/8 x 3/8 (3.375 x 4.125).

As a hot rodder and a mechanic, in those days, I don't remember split cylinder walls.
__________________
Frank
'35 Ford Model 51
'48 Ford F3
'54 Ford Tudor Mainline
frnkeore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2021, 05:30 PM   #7
cadillac512
Senior Member
 
cadillac512's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Kansas
Posts: 897
Default Re: 59AB sonic test. Good or bad?

I agree it looks fine. If you want to, you can shift the boring bar a bit to the thicker side...the offset won't hurt a thing.
__________________
"It don't take but country smarts to solve the problem" (Smokey Yunick)


'41 Merc Town Sedan / 260" 8CM engine
'66 Fairlane four door / "warmed up" 302
cadillac512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2021, 05:43 PM   #8
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,367
Default Re: 59AB sonic test. Good or bad?

The only risk is if there are pebbled spots of corrosion that might break through. This is the stuff that is hard to see. Keep your fingers crossed. A of folks get lucky on these old Fords.

Last edited by rotorwrench; 12-21-2021 at 11:16 AM.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2021, 01:43 PM   #9
Bored&Stroked
Senior Member
 
Bored&Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,009
Default Re: 59AB sonic test. Good or bad?

You should be just fine - I've tested quite a few blocks and if you have .120 you're more than good to go. Back in the full-on race days, there were guys that went all the way down to .080 or so. That is way too low for me in that the cylinder walls tend to want to do "the hullah dance" - making it hard for rings to seat and stay seated. Also, when you get under .100, there is much more of a chance of splitting a cylinder wall.

As noted by RotorWrench, the problems you can't see is if there is a rust pocket/pit or a casting flaw - so being a bit conservative is not a bad thing.
Bored&Stroked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2021, 02:53 PM   #10
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,732
Default Re: 59AB sonic test. Good or bad?

Gents: If one were considering "moving" bores about, what are the "rules"?
Do you move odd ones as necessary, or move them all in the same direction?

Max offset up and down? .010? .020?
Max offset side to side? .010? .020?

Any guidance gratefully received.
I'm just scoping out a .1875" overbore instead of a .125".

Mart.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2021, 04:09 PM   #11
Bored&Stroked
Senior Member
 
Bored&Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,009
Default Re: 59AB sonic test. Good or bad?

If you're going to be moving cylinders around a bit, also think about the THRUST sides of the cylinder - which is opposite on the Driver's side versus the passenger's side. On the Driver's side the major thrust side is the inner cylinder wall (intake side), while on the Passenger's side it is the outer cylinder wall (exhaust side). If one is moving the bore of the cylinder around, usually you want the most thickness on the major thrust side.

Just some more mumbo-jumbo to ponder! Best of luck.
Bored&Stroked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2021, 04:15 PM   #12
Desoto291Hemi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Carthage , Tennessee
Posts: 199
Default Re: 59AB sonic test. Good or bad?

Yes,,,,,like B&S said ,
Major thrust direction,,and minor thrust direction,,,,,matters .
Either way,,,,,I believe you should be fine,,,,unless you encounter porosity .

Tommy
Desoto291Hemi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2021, 11:25 PM   #13
cadillac512
Senior Member
 
cadillac512's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Kansas
Posts: 897
Default Re: 59AB sonic test. Good or bad?

Mart, when we bore blocks we move the bores as-needed...no set pattern. Usual maximum is .020" offset, .010" and less being more common.
__________________
"It don't take but country smarts to solve the problem" (Smokey Yunick)


'41 Merc Town Sedan / 260" 8CM engine
'66 Fairlane four door / "warmed up" 302
cadillac512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 AM.