Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-20-2014, 07:16 PM   #1
richard crow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,767
Default 1949-1950 lincoln rear

will a 1949-1951 baby lincoln rear fit a 51 mercury is the with the same
richard crow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2014, 07:42 PM   #2
oldsman41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 157
Default Re: 1949-1950 lincoln rear

well the merc is 61 inches wms to wms . don't know what the Lincoln is.
oldsman41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 05-20-2014, 08:51 PM   #3
Vic Piano
Senior Member
 
Vic Piano's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Odessa, FL
Posts: 7,611
Default Re: 1949-1950 lincoln rear

The "Baby" Lincoln is the same as the Merc, '49 - '51 from the cowl back, so the rear should fit.
__________________
Imagination is more important than knowledge.
Vic Piano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2014, 10:29 PM   #4
flatford8
Senior Member
 
flatford8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lyman,ME.
Posts: 2,622
Default Re: 1949-1950 lincoln rear

I've read "wms to wms" before when the discussion is about rearend widths.
Whats "wms...... Mark
__________________
I'm thinkin' about crankin'
My ragged ol' truck up
and haulin' myself into town.
Billy Joe Shaver
flatford8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2014, 11:14 PM   #5
Pete pa
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: allison park pa
Posts: 89
Default Re: 1949-1950 lincoln rear

wheel mounting surface
Pete pa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2014, 11:38 PM   #6
flatford8
Senior Member
 
flatford8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lyman,ME.
Posts: 2,622
Default Re: 1949-1950 lincoln rear

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Thanks Pete....I couldn't get a handle on that one.... Mark
__________________
I'm thinkin' about crankin'
My ragged ol' truck up
and haulin' myself into town.
Billy Joe Shaver
flatford8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2014, 08:39 AM   #7
19Fordy
Senior Member
 
19Fordy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,919
Default Re: 1949-1950 lincoln rear

The 49-51 Mercury Overhaul Manual shows that the rear tread width width for both the Lincoln and the Mercury was 60 inches. The Lincoln rims were 15 x 6 and the Merc rims were 15 x 5 1/2. So, it appears that the Lincoln rims had a deeper backspacing in order to end up with the same tread width as the Merc even though the Lincoln came with wider tires. Hence, the rear ends total widths are both the same, I think.
The Merc Manual says the following:

This makes me wonder if the words "axle assembly" mean the same as what we consider to be the rear end. The next 2 photos are of a 51 Merc rear.
Also, here's a HAMBER'S response. I agree that the Baby Lincoln rear should fit.
http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/t...incoln.750603/

Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_4284B.jpg (72.2 KB, 5 views)

Last edited by 19Fordy; 05-21-2014 at 12:28 PM.
19Fordy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2014, 11:21 AM   #8
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,416
Default Re: 1949-1950 lincoln rear

The Lincolns used the Dana 53 rear axle assembly that had a 4500 lb capacity over the Dana 44s 3500 lb capacity. The Dana 53 is a bastard step child and very hard to find parts for. Willys & Kaizer used them but not many others. Lincoln cars used them clear up into the 1960s but I don't know if there are many differences between year models or not.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2014, 12:30 PM   #9
19Fordy
Senior Member
 
19Fordy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,919
Default Re: 1949-1950 lincoln rear

Thanks rotorwrench. So even if the Lincoln rear is the same width it doesn't seem like a good choice.
19Fordy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2014, 04:14 PM   #10
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,416
Default Re: 1949-1950 lincoln rear

I did some searches for parts on the dana 53 and struck out so I think I would pass unless I was trying to restore an old Lincoln. The only part I could come up with was the gasket for the cover. The Dana 44 is way more better to find parts for. The Dana 53 might be OK and last a long time if it was in good condition. If condition is questionable then I'd stay away.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2014, 06:41 PM   #11
55 dude
Senior Member
 
55 dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 359
Default Re: 1949-1950 lincoln rear

just got offered and glad i passed! how is the support (Parts) for the dana 41?
55 dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 06:47 AM   #12
richard crow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,767
Default Re: 1949-1950 lincoln rear

if the rear is from a auto trans the ratio is 3.31 is a strong unit
richard crow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 11:09 AM   #13
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,416
Default Re: 1949-1950 lincoln rear

The Dana 41 was only used for a few years and hard parts are hard to source now. THe Dana 44 was used many more years & by many more manufacturers and most parts are still available.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 PM.