Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-15-2014, 10:06 AM   #21
tbirdtbird
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: inside your RAM
Posts: 3,134
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

with this much trouble at this point I would mill the head in question even if it is brand new. I would also consider that the deck may be warped and the engine may have to be pulled, taken apart, and hauled off to a machine shop for a slight cut. Then reassemble with the Felpro 7013 non-silicone version (anyone around here who has tried the silicone has had them fail early for whatever reason, so I have refused to try one) using the techniques already explained including 2 good sprays with Permatex copper coat.

I agree the pressurization did not contribute to failure but I still maintain it is unnecessary. I tour all over the place, 1000 miles at a clip, Mitchell, and never have a problem. The model A engine is so inefficient at fuel combustion that a quick warmup is never a problem. If you live in Alaska I suppose this could be different but in that case just use a stat
__________________
'31 180A
tbirdtbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2014, 12:37 PM   #22
Growley bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 777
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave in MN View Post
Regarding the failure of the head gasket in this thread: I don't think the pressurized system had anything to do with the failure other than it likely made the failure progress at a faster rate. I believe there is some other problem causing the failure. Studying the photos of the composite gasket, there is what appears to be a "carbon track" on the fire rings adjoining the failed area. It is likely that the escaping combustion gases eroded the composite material and the coolant leak followed. This area on used original or replacement stock heads is often collapsed when I surface them. It is not uncommon for this area of the head to be from .008" to .012" off from the rest of the head. I have not surfaced many new Snyder's heads so I have not noticed a pattern of similar collapse. I did have one new Snyder's head that would not hold gaskets (purchased in 2012) and I found this area collapsed as previously described after two gasket failures while running dyno tests. A second Snyder's head had a variation from normal on the combustion chamber that would not properly cover the fire ring...I substituted a gasket that better fit the chamber design and the problem ceased.

Pressurized system the cause of the failure...from my experience…I don't think so. The general consensus of the previous posters is a pressurized system is not necessary...and I agree: For the Model A that is maintained and driven like Ford envisioned, a pressurized cooling system is not needed. But...there are always a few that do not follow the norm and I happen to be part of this latter group. I drive most of my miles within Ford's design limits but I often get on the freeway and keep up with the traffic in the right lane. I have an inserted, counterweighted and balanced engine with a Mitchell overdrive. I have had a 3# pressurized system for 11 years and during that time driven over 70,000 miles. I have only changed the head gasket one time during that period...and that was because I wanted to check the head for carbon build-up...not because it had failed.
Regarding the type of gasket I have used during these miles: My first gasket was copper (19K miles). The second gasket is a Snyder's Premium B gasket with the silicone seals (52K miles). Both of these gaskets have worked fine under some pretty hard driving at times.
From my experience, a 3# pressurized system has its advantages if you often run at freeway speeds, primarily the coolant stays in the system and your hood and the highway remain dry. Before adding the pressurized system with expansion tank, I was washing my hood and adding coolant on a regular basis. With the pressurized system, I often go an entire season of driving without needing to add coolant. Just my experiences and opinion…formed over 70K+ miles.
I hope your search for answers is a short one!
Good Day!
Dave, thank you,
This is very good information. I'll pass it along; I am going to look at the gasket again this morning.

Chet
Growley bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 09-15-2014, 12:47 PM   #23
Growley bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 777
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbirdtbird View Post
with this much trouble at this point I would mill the head in question even if it is brand new. I would also consider that the deck may be warped and the engine may have to be pulled, taken apart, and hauled off to a machine shop for a slight cut. Then reassemble with the Felpro 7013 non-silicone version (anyone around here who has tried the silicone has had them fail early for whatever reason, so I have refused to try one) using the techniques already explained including 2 good sprays with Permatex copper coat.

I agree the pressurization did not contribute to failure but I still maintain it is unnecessary. I tour all over the place, 1000 miles at a clip, Mitchell, and never have a problem. The model A engine is so inefficient at fuel combustion that a quick warmup is never a problem. If you live in Alaska I suppose this could be different but in that case just use a stat
The head was resurfaced twice before two gasket changes; it had a slight twist both times. The deck was checked by a machinist and pronounced healthy. The troublesome 6.0:1 head has been substituted for a 5.5:1 head with a copper gasket from Snyder's. The cooling system so far will remain at 9#.
I'll keep everyone updated. Thank you for your help, I very much appreciate the time everyone has spent trying to help.

Chet
Growley bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2014, 01:30 PM   #24
tbirdtbird
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: inside your RAM
Posts: 3,134
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

"The head was resurfaced twice before two gasket changes; it had a slight twist both times."

Clearly a problem there.

If the owner keeps doing the same thing he should expect to keep getting the same results. Something is wrong. I'd have the deck re-checked maybe even by a different machinist. A simple straight edge does not get you where you wanna go

If he is not gonna give up on the 9# cap then I would love to know what the operating temp is on this baby. If he is running much over 200 then this is way over design temp and in fact that may be contributing to some warping somewhere. These are not freshly casted blocks; they are 85 yrs old and fatigued by many many temp swings
__________________
'31 180A
tbirdtbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2014, 01:37 PM   #25
Brian T
Senior Member
 
Brian T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Diego,Ca
Posts: 1,377
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

I have looked at many leaking head gaskets in my life time and its obvious the gasket is not to blame here. I see many places where gas leaked past the fire rings, I believe the erosion in the middle is from acid etching from exhaust leakage and is not a steel core gasket, its possible the pressure may have had some affect there.
It as to be losing head bolt torque or the cylinder head is collapsing possibly due to poor casting or material, I had to send back the first 5.5. head I received due to a large dimple in #3 combustion chamber and it appeared it had been surfaced by dragging it down a highway.
I should have sent back the second one for several reasons but decided to use it, I used the grey steel core Best gasket with no drips or seepage, and have not experienced any further movement in head bolt torque.
I agree with Growley Bear this is not a Vendor bashing post, but better quality control would be welcome.
__________________
Nothing can be made foolproof, ---- fools are ingenious bastards.

Last edited by Brian T; 09-15-2014 at 01:44 PM.
Brian T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2014, 05:06 PM   #26
Growley bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 777
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbirdtbird View Post
"The head was resurfaced twice before two gasket changes; it had a slight twist both times."

Clearly a problem there.

If the owner keeps doing the same thing he should expect to keep getting the same results. Something is wrong. I'd have the deck re-checked maybe even by a different machinist. A simple straight edge does not get you where you wanna go

If he is not gonna give up on the 9# cap then I would love to know what the operating temp is on this baby. If he is running much over 200 then this is way over design temp and in fact that may be contributing to some warping somewhere. These are not freshly casted blocks; they are 85 yrs old and fatigued by many many temp swings
I'll find out about the operating temp. That is a good point.


Chet
Growley bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2014, 05:22 PM   #27
Growley bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 777
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian T View Post
I have looked at many leaking head gaskets in my life time and its obvious the gasket is not to blame here. I see many places where gas leaked past the fire rings, I believe the erosion in the middle is from acid etching from exhaust leakage and is not a steel core gasket, its possible the pressure may have had some affect there.
It as to be losing head bolt torque or the cylinder head is collapsing possibly due to poor casting or material, I had to send back the first 5.5. head I received due to a large dimple in #3 combustion chamber and it appeared it had been surfaced by dragging it down a highway.
I should have sent back the second one for several reasons but decided to use it, I used the grey steel core Best gasket with no drips or seepage, and have not experienced any further movement in head bolt torque.
I agree with Growley Bear this is not a Vendor bashing post, but better quality control would be welcome.
The 6.0:1 head has been returned and a 5.5:1 has been installed in it's place.
This post is an effort to gather information from the experience of model A experts and it seems that we are moving in a positive direction. I didn't talk with Tom Snyder but the two guys who own the problem engines have and this post is an effort to help find a problem and correct it so that the end result is a better more reliable replacement part. I understand that there are engineers working on this at present but there is nothing like field tests to aid the engineers in their efforts. Thanks again for your interest and assistance. Lots of good solid experience and advice here,

Chet
Growley bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2014, 05:40 PM   #28
Growley bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 777
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Growley bear View Post
I'll find out about the operating temp. That is a good point.


Chet
The operating temp is 180 degrees mostly; as high as 190 on a long pull.
One of the A owners who had this problem with two or three head gaskets has since moved on to a Lion lll Speed head and with a few thousand miles has had no more problems. I'll try to find more info on the head gasket. The Lion head is said to be very heavy in that it contains more metal than the Model A head. I don't know about the speed heads and don't want to get off the main topic.

Chet
Growley bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2014, 11:52 PM   #29
tbirdtbird
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: inside your RAM
Posts: 3,134
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

I think 180-190 is quite acceptable.

This still bothers me:
"The head was resurfaced twice before two gasket changes; it had a slight twist both times."

Assembly technique is always a possibility. You never really know what someone else does unless you are standing right there. It does seem like these guys know what they are doing, tho.

Have they ever had a problem getting a stock head to seal on any car?

I have to ask.

A related example was a guy at a paint and body seminar that Miles ran who had a problem with fish eye "no matter what he did"

Long story, we had to query him very closely to uncover what he was doing: he would clean his panels with lacquer thinner ( a no-no), then wash the lacquer thinner off with soap and water. Hmm, why would that give fish eye ?!

Please keep us posted we can all learn from this
__________________
'31 180A
tbirdtbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2014, 08:46 AM   #30
Growley bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 777
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbirdtbird View Post
I think 180-190 is quite acceptable.

This still bothers me:
"The head was resurfaced twice before two gasket changes; it had a slight twist both times."

Assembly technique is always a possibility. You never really know what someone else does unless you are standing right there. It does seem like these guys know what they are doing, tho.

Have they ever had a problem getting a stock head to seal on any car?

I have to ask.

A related example was a guy at a paint and body seminar that Miles ran who had a problem with fish eye "no matter what he did"

Long story, we had to query him very closely to uncover what he was doing: he would clean his panels with lacquer thinner ( a no-no), then wash the lacquer thinner off with soap and water. Hmm, why would that give fish eye ?!

Please keep us posted we can all learn from this
The head/heads 6.0:1 with the twist were sent back to the vendor.
Bruce who went to the lion head and has had no trouble since owns a well equipped machine shop and is very meticulous person. He has been in the business for years and the quality of his work is first class.
Ed's engine has since been fitted with the 5.5 head with the Felpro copper gasket and copper coat. So far the head has been retorqued three times over 100 miles and no reported problems.
I will keep everyone updated on this. Thanks again for all the participation with this very interesting subject.
This has been and will continue to be a learning experience.

Chet
Growley bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 07:29 AM   #31
Growley bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 777
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

Update on cylinder head. As stated the 6.1 head was sent back to Snyder's and a 5.5:1 head was installed in its place with the felpro copper gasket and two coats of coppercoat. So far 300 mi.and 3 retorques with only one head nut being taken up about 1/8 inch of a turn.
Snyder's has made this head problem more than right with my friend; so much so that he called and asked Tom if he had made a mistake.
Snyder's is a quality company with quality customer support. Thank You, Tom.

Chet
Growley bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 08:32 AM   #32
Bob Bidonde
Senior Member
 
Bob Bidonde's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,429
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

I doubt that this is a cause of the gasket failures. Grade 8 studs are not as elastic as the original studs, so they change the load contribution in the cylinder head and block. The threads in the block, which are the weak link in the joint, have a higher stress levels because of the Grade 8 studs.
__________________
Bob Bidonde
Bob Bidonde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 08:49 AM   #33
V4F
Senior Member
 
V4F's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ca.
Posts: 2,522
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

The best way to go is with a copper head gasket, sprayed with Copper Coat, and most important, torque the head down in increments starting at 35# then 45# and then 55#, unless you have grade 8 studs and a good block then to 60# hot.

i agree . 7-1 head daily driver , no problems . steve
__________________
V4f
V4F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2014, 10:46 PM   #34
Lowbuckboz
Member
 
Lowbuckboz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Deerfield, NJ
Posts: 85
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

Best money you can spend on an A engine is good head studs.
__________________
1927 T, 1930 A coupe, 1929 A Roadster, 1933 Dodge pickup, 1935 5 window coupe
Lowbuckboz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2015, 05:33 PM   #35
V4F
Senior Member
 
V4F's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ca.
Posts: 2,522
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

call your vendor & ask for "BEST" copper crush head gasket . use copper coat on both
sides . running a 7-1 head with no problems using this method ........ steve
__________________
V4f
V4F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2015, 06:03 PM   #36
quickchange
Senior Member
 
quickchange's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nelson. New Zealand
Posts: 1,999
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

When using either ofsnyders heads CHECK , the copper felpro A gasket will overhang the combustion chamber in the valve area this may cause the engine to sound rough under acceleraion, NOW the felpro B gasket does not have this problem BUT on a 4" bore unlike the A gasket there is not much piston clearance ,
I also have one 6.1 snyder head here that was poorly machined with stud hole 1/2 a hole out ,this would place the head out of aligine on the block, I can put pictures up if you wish to support my claim, Im not getting at anyone just stating what i have & found , Derek in a cool NZ , Please keep the salt dry this year,
quickchange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2015, 07:16 PM   #37
pgerhardt
Senior Member
 
pgerhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Danbury Ct
Posts: 1,254
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

It is my understanding that the only reason for a pressurized cooling system is to raise the boiling point and prevent overheating. The same goal can be attained without any increase in pressure by switching to waterless coolant which has a boiling point of 375 degrees F.

http://lubricationspecialist.com/eva...ZJaxoCIFvw_wcB
pgerhardt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2015, 07:26 PM   #38
mrtexas
Senior Member
 
mrtexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 4,393
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pgerhardt View Post
It is my understanding that the only reason for a pressurized cooling system is to raise the boiling point and prevent overheating. The same goal can be attained without any increase in pressure by switching to waterless coolant which has a boiling point of 375 degrees F.

http://lubricationspecialist.com/eva...ZJaxoCIFvw_wcB
How good is the heat transfer with the waterless coolant? Water is better than anything. There is more to overheating than the boiling point of the coolant.
mrtexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2015, 11:05 AM   #39
pgerhardt
Senior Member
 
pgerhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Danbury Ct
Posts: 1,254
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

Jay Leno uses waterless coolant in all his vintage cars and has extolled the benefits of it, especially for non pressurized cooling systems, on his youtube channel. He has the money and technical resources to fully research the topic and has more money invested in vintage automobiles than probably everyone here together.
pgerhardt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2015, 01:23 PM   #40
MikeK
Senior Member
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Windy City
Posts: 2,919
Default Re: head gasket/6:1/mystery?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrtexas View Post
How good is the heat transfer with the waterless coolant? Water is better than anything. There is more to overheating than the boiling point of the coolant.
The specific heat of water is about 1.0008 Btu/lb per degree F @212F. The specific heat of waterless coolant (straight ethylene glycol) is about 0.67 Btu/lb per degree F @212F.

If your cooling system is marginal with water and sometimes runs ~200F, you need two things to maintain 200F with waterless: 1) Increased circulation volume to 'move' the same amount of heat away from the block at the same rate. 2) Increased radiator heat dissipation ability. How much more? About 49%.

If you increased your cooling system dissipation capacity you wouldn't need the waterless in the first place! Leaving all as is, placing waterless in that engine will result in it running ~230F at those times it ran 200F with water.

OK, it doesn't boil over with waterless. OK? I think not. Most people have the sense to stop when a boil-over occurs @212F. With waterless and no changes in either your pump rate or radiator capacity you would be running at 254F. Or maybe not- If your engine has standard piston clearances that reduce to near zero @212F, the waterless will give you no warning and you will just seize up.

I'm not much for embracing testimonials, especially from rich comedians with no engineering background. To me it's simple. Fix the problem, not the symptom.

If you want to try this stuff, go ahead. Just watch your temperature like a hawk, and do not think you can run @250F without engine damage. Also, expect it to always run hotter than with water or 50/50 (Sp.Gr. 0.88). Directly from Evans website "The operating temperature of the coolant may increase slightly" . . . Define "slightly".
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 AM.