Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2022, 02:34 AM   #1
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Question '36 221 - rebuildable??

Hi everyone,

I'm new here and totally new to these old Fords and flatheads. I just bought a 36 Touring Sedan and had it shipped from Pennsylvania to The Netherlands. The car seems to be complete and in decent shape. We've started to inspect the engine first to see what we got ourselves into...

We pulled the heads. They have the 68- prefix, I've understoord these heads were installed at a later stage, so the engine probably was rebuilt before. No LB marking found. The car whas a late 36 VIN though. Only 'SPH' in the area between the head and intake manifold. Anyone know what this means?

20221201_104437~2.jpg

20221201_104359.jpg

IMG-20221130-WA0007.jpg

20221202_112434.jpg

The driver's side looked ok I guess. Working on an engine is new to me, so any advice/info is welcome. The cylinders are smooth and were dry. Some coolant entered when removing the heads. What strikes me is that all the valves, except for one, are open.

We had good hopes after pulling the driver's side head, but the passenger side is different. The most rear cylinder was filled with coolant (I assume) and lots of crud. The cylinder wall is very rough with rust. Same for it's valves. The head for that cylinder is the same.

20221202_114428.jpg
20221202_131043.jpg
20221202_132500.jpg
20221202_134546~2.jpg

Next will be taking of the intake manifold to have a good look inside.

Anyone any pointers/thoughts/tips/etc.??

What I'm wondering is how all the valves, except one, are open. And what happened to that wet cylinder. Leaking head gasket? Something internally? Anyone any experience with an engine looking like this? Thanks.

Dennis
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2022, 04:39 AM   #2
frnkeore
Senior Member
 
frnkeore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 782
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

The reason for the late heads, is that on it's last rebuild, they put domed piston in.

The valves are just stuck open. You can probably tap most of them back down.

As for main bearings, you'll have to pull a main bearing cap and check for inserts.

Check to see if there is a plate (each side) on the front of the block, where the WP would go on the later blocks. You could have a '38 style, 21 stud block.

My '35 truck engine had a late block replacement. Same heads and pistons as yours.
__________________
Frank
'35 Ford Model 51
'48 Ford F3
'54 Ford Tudor Mainline
frnkeore is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-04-2022, 06:46 AM   #3
corvette8n
Senior Member
 
corvette8n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: 36 miles north of Albany NY
Posts: 2,943
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Welcome to the barn, looks like you have your work cut out for you. Hang around here and you’ll learn a lot.

Get yourself this book
https://shop.efv8.org/collections/fo...book-softbound

Last edited by corvette8n; 12-04-2022 at 07:12 AM. Reason: Added link.
corvette8n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2022, 09:28 AM   #4
Ggmac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,086
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Welcome . I’ve got 2 late 36 21 stud engines with SPH stamped on the deck , both have insert bearings. I’ve tried to determine the SHP stamping but have 2 suggestions from others , one was steel pistons and sleeves and the other I forgot . Oh well old age .
That motor looks better than the two I cleaned up . Id check to see if the pistons are steel as they use different rings , if your intent was to rering and get it running .
Good luck .
Gary
Ggmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2022, 09:30 AM   #5
Ggmac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,086
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Clean up the top of a piston and check for numbers stamped in for over size .
Ggmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2022, 09:40 AM   #6
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Thanks! #3 Already got it. [emoji106]

Any ideas what might have caused that wet corroded cylinder?



Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2022, 02:20 PM   #7
Ggmac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,086
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Check for obvious cyl head gasket leak , spark plug missing its gasket , head crack or warped or last a crack in the block .
Don’t forget these have small welch plugs on the bottom oil pan rail that can leak coolant into the oil . Make sure to replace them .
Ggmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2022, 02:22 PM   #8
Ggmac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,086
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

That really doesnt look that bad . If I knew how to post pictures, Id show you mine before I reringed it .
Ggmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2022, 02:38 PM   #9
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Thanks for the suggestions!

Yeah, pictures are a bit tricky. In Tapatalk on my phone, I can apparantly upload them directly into my post.

On my tablet (Fordbarn website) it's different. When replying, select 'Go Advanced', then select the Attachment symbol first (paperclip symbol), add the pictures and than go back to the reply field (page back). Then the uploaded pictures could be selected through that same attachment icon.

Not really userfriendly.


Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2022, 06:48 PM   #10
Bored&Stroked
Senior Member
 
Bored&Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,062
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

The valves are up because they are stuck in the valve guides - which is pretty common given this thing has probably been sitting for decades.

The cylinder with the rust obviously had water in it - the question is from where? Did the car have an air cleaner on it when you got it? Is it possible that water came in through the carb? That would be your best situation. As others noted, can be a blown gasket, can be a cracked block, can have fatal issues or not. etc.. One thing is for sure, you can't just throw it back together and expect it to run well . . . if at all. It is guaranteed that the valve seats are rusted, the rings will have issues on that one cylinder, etc.. Pull the engine, get the correct adapter to mount it on a stand (side mount) and get into the details of it.

The right thing to do is to pull the engine and go through it - otherwise you have no idea what you're dealing with, if it can be rebuilt, etc.. I'd highly recommend that you locate some very experienced flathead guys to work with (if at all possible). These engines are relatively simple, but you still need to know the nuances about them, what to check for, what to do, what not to do, etc.. Also, any machine work that needs to be done needs to be done by a machine shop that has extensive flathead experience - otherwise all sorts of bad things can happen.

Best of luck - thanks for coming on the Barn and we look forward to seeing you getting your 36 on the road!

B&S
Bored&Stroked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2022, 08:14 AM   #11
mfirth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: ohio
Posts: 986
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

As you "clean up" that engine you might want to read GB Sicsion's post on preasure testing the block. Best wishes for a fun & GR8 build.
mfirth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2022, 08:51 AM   #12
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,781
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

too bad you didnt buy a spare motor and put it into the trunk when you shipped the car over.......

would have come in handy.
ronn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2022, 09:07 AM   #13
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by ronn View Post
too bad you didnt buy a spare motor and put it into the trunk when you shipped the car over.......

would have come in handy.
Wouldn't have fit in the trunk. We considered putting one in the rear, taking the back seat out. We were afraid though the floor wouldnt take it. Besides, we couldn't lift a spare engine by hand. But yeah, would have been very usefull.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2022, 03:02 PM   #14
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Took off the intake manifold today. What a surprise awaited us...[emoji3061] I don't know what happened there, but what a mess. It's the first engine I'm taking apart though, so maybe I'm wrong here. I hope so...

Dried up oil en goey everywhere. The pistons are steel, I checked that, but I couldn't find any stamps or writings about overbore. I measured the bore, says 3.08". The valves had 'Ford F' and 'Ford R' stamps.

Next will be the oil pan....

Dennis

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2022, 05:53 PM   #15
cas3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: sw minnesota
Posts: 4,567
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Yup ! thats a crusty flathead ! CALLING MART...TO THE FRONT DESK PLEASE !
cas3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2022, 06:30 PM   #16
Brian
Senior Member
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 3,828
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Don't get discouraged- yet!! Keep at it. You'll need to get it fully stripped, cleaned up before you really can get an indication of what you've got. If it means anything, myself, and no doubt many others have rebuilt engines that initially looked as bad as yours. good luck!
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit!
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2022, 02:57 AM   #17
frnkeore
Senior Member
 
frnkeore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 782
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

That's about what a high mileage engine looked like, in the early '60's, when I became a mechanic. The worst one I had to clean, was 215 Chev. I was a good thing that I was young (18) and wanted to be a mechanic, real bad.

You can thank the old non-detergent oil for that mess.

In those days, "high mileage" meant, 70K. You had a hard time getting rid of a 100K car!!! Many were just junked with that kind of mileage.
__________________
Frank
'35 Ford Model 51
'48 Ford F3
'54 Ford Tudor Mainline
frnkeore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2022, 10:45 AM   #18
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,743
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

It's surprising how an engine can be oily and rusty at the same time. Lots of condensation I suppose.

I would carefully inspect all around the pan rail for cracks before launching in and trying to dismantle the top end.

I rebuilt a couple of engines that were pretty bad and you might enjoy some of the videos I made.

Crusty Flatty: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...nhHBvLs12GnGQu

Ol'59 Flatty: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...THMrri6-8w-LBI

Lots of discussions here lately about removing valves.
Lots of discussions about head studs too.

Any questions just ask.

Is the motor out of the car? Are you aware to avoid mounting the motor on a conventional engine stand via the half bellhousing?

Mart.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2022, 12:22 PM   #19
pistonbroke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Perry Mo.
Posts: 475
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

I wish the last V12 Lincoln I did would have looked as good as your V8 Ford. Like Mart said pull the pan and check for cracks along the block where the pan gasket sits. Then you know if you need to go farther. So far what you've shown us is a basic rebuild with possibly a sleeve in one cylinder. Keep the pictures coming with your questions . We will be here. Tim
pistonbroke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2022, 08:07 PM   #20
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,420
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

The car was likely used for mostly short trips where the engine didn't fully warm up to operating temperature. Engines used this way get sludged up bad if operated for long periods like that. The water in the cylinder could have been coolant. If it was then there is likely coolant in the pan too.

Climate of long term storage has a lot to do with condition of engine internals. A well stored car would have had less corrosion but could've still had some depending on temperature changes and relative humidity. I've seen a lot worse but the cylinder could be a candidate for resleeve. The cylinder walls on the old 221s are not all that thick. Whether it is a large bearing engine (LB) or an older poured babbitt engine will be the thing a person needs to know.

Last edited by rotorwrench; 12-06-2022 at 08:13 PM.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2022, 09:04 AM   #21
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Thanks a lot everyone for all the input.

@Mart
We tried to pull the pan yesterday, but thought we knew better than the repair manual. We couldn't get the pan past those radius rod (?). We did raise the engine though. The manual tells to turn the crankshaft, but the engine is stuck. We'll give it another try tomorrow. and loosen those rods.

I'll check out your videos, thanks. So the motor is still in the car. I was hoping to get a good impression on it's state before pulling the engine out. I did get a peek after lowering the pan a bit...same rusty wet look though. Didn't check the pan rail yet. Thanks for that mounting tip....we'll keep it in mind in case we pull the engine.

The car's history isn't really clear. It spent the last 20 years in a barn in Pennsylvania. It was last registered in '66, also in Pennsylvania. It looks like they did indeed work on the engine before. Till now everything came off pretty easily. Even the rusted exhaust link pipe and the exhaust at the manifolds. We inspected the bottom of the car. Looks pretty solid, besides the obvious surface rust. The car seems complete as well. I did take a hit at the left front some point, braking the bumper bracket and bending the fender and grill a little bit. It caused the left headlight to be a bit closer to the cowling. The chassis seems straight though.

Depending on the engine being an LB engine or not and salvageable or not I'll have to decide what route to take here. It won't be a full resoration in any case, but a technical restoration and just drive it. Slight interior improvement, rust treatment on the outside and go. Maybe juice brakes, depending on it's stopping abilities.[emoji16]

Dennis

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-T720 met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2022, 10:21 AM   #22
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,743
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Whatever happens, I can't imagine a scenario where the motor does not need to come out. I would advise just bite the bullet and pull it. (I'm a poet). If in doubt yank it out. (told you).

Mart.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-07-2022, 12:23 PM   #23
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,420
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

I'd have to agree with Mart. The condition warrants work that is much better and easier done out of the car. As was mentioned, an engine stand adapter that connects the the exhaust ports is much better than worrying about cracking the rear bell area. The casting is not all that thick on the rear end there.

The one rusty piston is likely the sticking point. Just getting the valves out is a big job and they should come out to insure serviceability. If the engine was not so internally fowled and the cylinders were all still void of corrosion, things would be different. That one is just beyond that state. Everything needs to be cleaned & checked.

Last edited by rotorwrench; 12-07-2022 at 12:31 PM.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2022, 02:14 PM   #24
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Yeah, we'll probably pull the engine. I measured the bore btw, says 3.08". As far as this is accurate, the measuring caliper was a relatively cheap one.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2022, 02:42 PM   #25
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,743
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

That's 17.5 thou over standard. Could be 15, could be 20 depending on how accurate the measuring method. Any marks on the good pistons?
standard bore is 3-1/16"
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2022, 04:13 PM   #26
Ggmac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,086
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Isnt std 3.087?
Ggmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2022, 04:21 PM   #27
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,420
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

It would 3 1/16" or 3.0625. If it was previouy overhauled with a bore job then the oversize should be on top of the pistons.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2022, 04:48 PM   #28
jimTN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Powell, TN
Posts: 2,508
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Its hard to tell from the pics but most of those engines had sleeves. The easiest way to work that bad cyl may be to break the piston out driving from below, worst case cutting the rod into, then -putting a sleeve in that cyl bored to match what you bore the other cyl's. As wore as the engine is I would suspect it will need boring all cyls.
jimTN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2022, 06:25 PM   #29
Ggmac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,086
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by rotorwrench View Post
It would 3 1/16" or 3.0625. If it was previouy overhauled with a bore job then the oversize should be on top of the pistons.
Thanks . It seems like Im losing it . One foot in front of the other .
Gary
Ggmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2022, 07:43 PM   #30
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,420
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

I think the tin can sleeves came later but it depends on which block it has. The 21-stud block doesn't have as much room for sleeves as the 24-stud blocks.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2022, 09:42 AM   #31
Rodrelic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Florida panhandle
Posts: 194
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Does it have water pump block off plates on the block just below the head mounted water pumps?
Rodrelic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2022, 10:22 AM   #32
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodrelic View Post
Does it have water pump block off plates on the block just below the head mounted water pumps?
99% sure it doesn't. Lots of mud and cr@p there, but at first glance I didn't see a plate and bolts.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2022, 12:23 PM   #33
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Well, we didn't manage to get the oil pan off. The engine is stuck, so we couldn't turn the crankshaft to clear the pan inside. So, the unevitable is next....taking the engine out.

I cleaned a small piece of the oil pan rail, but didn't see any cracks (yet).

I did get a peek inside though. Same rusty appearance. I was able to measure the distance between the most rear visible studs. If I'm correct, that's the rear main bearing? Measures around 3 1/4".

So am I looking at an LB engine!?[emoji850]

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2022, 01:18 PM   #34
bobH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: so cal, placerville, vegas
Posts: 1,394
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Regarding that 3.08 measurement.... It depends on how that was obtained. If he measured BELOW the ridge, it likely just indicates a worn cylinder, based on standard bore. If he measured the diameter ON the ridge, then the 'puzzle' indicated in the previous posts still applies. (Opinion) In any event... I see a lot of work, and a fixable engine. And, if an LB, in my opinion, I'd go for it. (I'm prejudiced, I have some good memories with an LB.)
bobH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2022, 10:53 AM   #35
rottenron36
Senior Member
 
rottenron36's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Corbett OR
Posts: 233
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Don't forget how hard it is to find rod bearings, and how expensive they are!
rottenron36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2022, 11:09 AM   #36
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,525
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjaakslinger View Post
Well, we didn't manage to get the oil pan off. The engine is stuck, so we couldn't turn the crankshaft to clear the pan inside. So, the unevitable is next....taking the engine out.

I cleaned a small piece of the oil pan rail, but didn't see any cracks (yet).

I did get a peek inside though. Same rusty appearance. I was able to measure the distance between the most rear visible studs. If I'm correct, that's the rear main bearing? Measures around 3 1/4".

So am I looking at an LB engine!?[emoji850]

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
3 1/4" would be LB block.
flatjack9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2022, 12:23 PM   #37
GB SISSON
Senior Member
 
GB SISSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Orcas Island Washington
Posts: 4,914
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Believe me, when I can 'start 'em in the field' and drive them away, that is my favorite kind of old truck adventure. I have pulled that off maybe six times in 50 years of picking up old fords. Those with mechanical brakes were extra fun because you actually could start driving them as is (if one happens to live on the back side of a rural island). BUT.... your engine is not a candidate for that particular brand of fun. They are sooo difficult to work in in the vehicle and sooo nice on a stand. Do yourself a favor and pull that bad tooth out. It will feel much better after that!
__________________
Owner/Operator of 'Jailbar Ranch' on the side of Mt. Pickett. Current stable consists of 1946 1/2 ton pickup turned woodie wagon with FH V8, 1947 Tonner Pickup (red) mostly stock with exception of a cummins 6at turbo diesel, 1946 Tonner Pickup (green) with 226 cu in 6 cyl flathead, 1979 Toyota landcruiser wagon, completely encased in 1947 Ford Jailbar sheet metal. Ok, cornbinder rear fenders..... 'Rusty ol' floorboards, hot on their feet' (Alan Jackson)
GB SISSON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 11:24 AM   #38
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Ok, working towards the inevitable...taking the engine out. We removed the grill and radiator as well as the passenger toe board and the trans cover plate. Next will be the shifter and clutch linkage.

Any tips/pointers for getting the engine and trans out? Where is the (approx.) center of gravity of the engine+trans? Might help in lifting... Thanks.

Dennis

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 11:50 AM   #39
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,743
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Somewhere near here.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cofg.jpg (38.0 KB, 35 views)
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 12:13 PM   #40
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mart View Post
Somewhere near here.
[emoji106]

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 01:40 PM   #41
KiWinUS
Senior Member
 
KiWinUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC KiWi-L100 available here
Posts: 2,954
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Too late now but the grill can stay in.
KiWinUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 01:41 PM   #42
40 Deluxe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,778
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimTN View Post
Its hard to tell from the pics but most of those engines had sleeves. The easiest way to work that bad cyl may be to break the piston out driving from below, worst case cutting the rod into, then -putting a sleeve in that cyl bored to match what you bore the other cyl's. As wore as the engine is I would suspect it will need boring all cyls.
DO NOT damage the rod if at all possible! They are weight matched as a set at the factory so keep all eight together. Kill the piston instead. The rod bearings are full floating so are subject to wear on both surfaces. The bearings are available in various combinations of oversize outer diameters (the rod is bored/honed oversize to match) and undersize inside diameters (to fit a reground crankshaft). The flanged rod bearings are on ebay in various sizes. Get everything measured before ordering bearings. It's amazing how well these full floaters hold up. You may not even need new ones.
40 Deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-13-2022, 02:00 PM   #43
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by KiWinUS View Post
Too late now but the grill can stay in.
Thanks, but it needed some attention anyway.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 02:03 PM   #44
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40 Deluxe View Post
DO NOT damage the rod if at all possible! They are weight matched as a set at the factory so keep all eight together. Kill the piston instead. The rod bearings are full floating so are subject to wear on both surfaces. The bearings are available in various combinations of oversize outer diameters (the rod is bored/honed oversize to match) and undersize inside diameters (to fit a reground crankshaft). The flanged rod bearings are on ebay in various sizes. Get everything measured before ordering bearings. It's amazing how well these full floaters hold up. You may not even need new ones.
Thanks. Besides the rods, what else? I suppose the valves and springs would need replacing anyways?

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 02:28 PM   #45
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,302
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Some of the valve train components are bound to be damaged on removal in an engine like this. The later (non-mushroom stem valves and related) parts from an 8BA type engine are easier to get, easier to work with, and easier to pay for (at least here in the states).
tubman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2022, 01:04 AM   #46
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Do those later non-mushroom types fit in my 36 engine?

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2022, 04:44 AM   #47
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,743
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Yes.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2022, 07:58 AM   #48
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Thanks. Trying to figure out which parts of the engine I should definately safe and which can/should be replaced.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2022, 08:54 AM   #49
sugarmaker
Senior Member
 
sugarmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Albion PA
Posts: 1,676
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Your doing good! That bad boy needs to come out! It looks like it will need LOTS of love!
Get a engine lifter hooked on to that where mart points and pick that engine out.
Looking forward to your next steps! Good pictures by the way!
Regards,
Chris
__________________
1932 AAB Truck
1953 Ford Jubilee
2015 Ford F250 SuperCrew
Lots of Allis tractors
Some Cub Cadets
sugarmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2022, 09:22 AM   #50
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,743
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Don't rule out being able to source a replacement motor. There are French and German flatheads, all of which could be made to work in your car. Plus there were a lot of USA cars in Holland back in the day. Do you know anyone in Holland into hot rods? They might have leads on motors. I know a couple of people in Holland.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2022, 12:58 PM   #51
AZ34
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 11
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Reposted in a new thread.

Last edited by AZ34; 12-14-2022 at 02:49 PM.
AZ34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2022, 02:38 PM   #52
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mart View Post
Don't rule out being able to source a replacement motor. There are French and German flatheads, all of which could be made to work in your car. Plus there were a lot of USA cars in Holland back in the day. Do you know anyone in Holland into hot rods? They might have leads on motors. I know a couple of people in Holland.
No, I don't know any 'flathead people' here. If my engine isn't a rebuild candidate, I have to really think it over about the car. Too many other car projects to go crazy on the Ford. Maybe if I sell another car... But I'm not there yet.[emoji16]

Still moderately positive about the engine. Hoping to pull it tomorrow and check it out more. Especially the main bearings.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 03:31 PM   #53
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Got the engine out. Went pretty ok. Wasn't sure about those 2 horizontal rods coming from the frame going through the sides of the bell housing. We pulled the engine forward and got it all clear.

Next will be finding the proper way to mount the engine on an engine stand. If anyone has some pictures of what they use, it would be appreciated.

Not so nice was to find out the left front took a hit at some point. That crossmember/bar between the front wheels has a bend. [emoji19] I'll post some pics and questions in a new thread.

Dennis

I think the car looks a bit like a toothless grandma now....

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 06:29 PM   #54
cas3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: sw minnesota
Posts: 4,567
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

The side of the block where the exhaust ports are is a 45% angle. Just use a manifold for a bolt pattern, and cut a tube that fits your engine stand at 45% and weld it up. Note the front two bolts are bigger
cas3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2023, 11:04 AM   #55
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

We're working on a plate to mount the engine stand on the exhaust manifold port. Would a 5mm/1/5 inch plate be thick enough?

Dennis

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2023, 02:25 PM   #56
frnkeore
Senior Member
 
frnkeore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 782
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

6mm would be better but, I think 5mm will work fine.
__________________
Frank
'35 Ford Model 51
'48 Ford F3
'54 Ford Tudor Mainline
frnkeore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2023, 02:52 PM   #57
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,743
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

No You want at least 8mm.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2023, 03:44 PM   #58
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Ok, so I guess 2 of them together to be sure.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2023, 03:51 PM   #59
bobH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: so cal, placerville, vegas
Posts: 1,394
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

I don't 'speak-mm', so I converted from 3/8 and came up with something a little heavier that what Mart posted. So, as post 58 suggests, I'd go with the two. But, from my perspective, being old and lazy, I'd BUY a mount... previously discussed and posted here on the barn. (obviously, just opinion)
bobH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2023, 04:00 PM   #60
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,743
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

8mm is 5/16" and 3/8 is just a bit less than 10mm.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2023, 04:17 PM   #61
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobH View Post
I don't 'speak-mm', so I converted from 3/8 and came up with something a little heavier that what Mart posted. So, as post 58 suggests, I'd go with the two. But, from my perspective, being old and lazy, I'd BUY a mount... previously discussed and posted here on the barn. (obviously, just opinion)
Being in The Netherlands makes getting a mount a bit difficult, they're not readily available. We came up with design like in the pics. We found a tube just thick enough to snugly fit in the stand. We used the exhaust manifold as a template and makes 2 plates that go together. To be sure.

We'll weld some additional triangle shaped support brackets between the tube and the plate.


Any other suggestions are welcome.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2023, 12:15 AM   #62
GB SISSON
Senior Member
 
GB SISSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Orcas Island Washington
Posts: 4,914
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjaakslinger View Post
Being in The Netherlands makes getting a mount a bit difficult, they're not readily available. We came up with design like in the pics. We found a tube just thick enough to snugly fit in the stand. We used the exhaust manifold as a template and makes 2 plates that go together. To be sure.

We'll weld some additional triangle shaped support brackets between the tube and the plate.


Any other suggestions are welcome.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk

You are a quick study. That looks exactly right and you'll have that engine mounted in no time, and mounted the safe and correct way! Before long there WILL be a flathead guy in your neighborhood. You.
__________________
Owner/Operator of 'Jailbar Ranch' on the side of Mt. Pickett. Current stable consists of 1946 1/2 ton pickup turned woodie wagon with FH V8, 1947 Tonner Pickup (red) mostly stock with exception of a cummins 6at turbo diesel, 1946 Tonner Pickup (green) with 226 cu in 6 cyl flathead, 1979 Toyota landcruiser wagon, completely encased in 1947 Ford Jailbar sheet metal. Ok, cornbinder rear fenders..... 'Rusty ol' floorboards, hot on their feet' (Alan Jackson)
GB SISSON is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 01-13-2023, 02:35 PM   #63
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Thought I'd post some of the small progress we made. We decided to work on the studs and valves first before mounting the engine in a stand. Much steadier like this. It does mean we haven't pulled the pan yet to verify if it is indeed an LB block, but it's surprise me if it isn't.

Since we'll install new valves, springs, etc., I handled them the hard way. The guides were so stuck that I couldn't get the horseshoe clips out, even if they moved. So I cut the springs, wriggled the lower clip out. Then removed the spring remains, lifted the valve and cut the valve stem just below the valve. Then I could hammer down the valve guide with a small tube.

And I got most of the studs out, only 4 to go. The top ones seem the hardest. Took a lot of heating with an induction heater tool, Mystery oil, etc. And the 'offset type' stud remover tool. It's a bit hard for me to tell how much force I can apply with my torque wrench. Don't want to break a stud.... Easy does it I guess.

There does seem to be a crack between a stud hole and a water hole.[emoji19] We'll have the block magnafluxed at some point. Any thought on those kind of cracks?

To be continued.

Dennis

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2023, 03:13 PM   #64
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,743
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Those cracks are very common and not normally judged to be a problem. People joke that those cracks have Ford part numbers.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2023, 03:38 PM   #65
leon bee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 611
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

That is looking way better already and I'm hoping it all goes well.
leon bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2023, 04:11 PM   #66
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mart View Post
Those cracks are very common and not normally judged to be a problem. People joke that those cracks have Ford part numbers.
That's somewhat comforting. [emoji16]

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2023, 04:11 PM   #67
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by leon bee View Post
That is looking way better already and I'm hoping it all goes well.
Thanks. Yeah, so far it's not hopeless I guess.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2023, 05:17 PM   #68
OldGold360
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: SW WA
Posts: 639
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjaakslinger View Post
Being in The Netherlands makes getting a mount a bit difficult, they're not readily available. We came up with design like in the pics. We found a tube just thick enough to snugly fit in the stand. We used the exhaust manifold as a template and makes 2 plates that go together. To be sure.

We'll weld some additional triangle shaped support brackets between the tube and the plate.


Any other suggestions are welcome.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
That’s pretty much exactly how I made mine. Mine is 3/8” thick steel, which is probably overkill, but it’s what I had.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg B2958551-8E83-4DCA-B258-8886B2D2F3AC.jpeg (92.5 KB, 34 views)
OldGold360 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2023, 11:01 AM   #69
Rodrelic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Florida panhandle
Posts: 194
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

I have been collecting bearing sets as they come up cheap for about 30 years, I can see what I have for full floating. I have 2 early motors that are not fresh so after I have saved some for that no sense in hoarding the rest.
Rodrelic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2023, 12:23 PM   #70
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodrelic View Post
I have been collecting bearing sets as they come up cheap for about 30 years, I can see what I have for full floating. I have 2 early motors that are not fresh so after I have saved some for that no sense in hoarding the rest.
[emoji106]

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2023, 10:25 AM   #71
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Got all the studs out. In 1 piece![emoji817][emoji3060] Thanks to heating, Mystery oil, tapping, a $20,- stud remover tool and patience.

It probably helps that the engine was overhauled at some point way back in the days.

So far the decks look ok by visual inspection. I got 14 valve assemblies completely out, 2 are limited by the position of the camshaft. Those will come later.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2023, 04:21 AM   #72
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

[emoji120][emoji322] It's an LB! [emoji16]

So finally we have the 221 mounted in an engine stand and were able to get 1 of the main bearing caps of. A bit expected, or at least hoped for, it turned out to have the insert bearing! I don't have any experience with these engines, but I'd say it all looks pretty decent so far. The bearings seems to be stock size. They have a 'Ford A' stamp and a 'D'. Anyone know what these stand for?

Got one piston out so far. Seems to be stock size, it measures 3.06".

The oil pump is stuck. Any suggestions how to get it out? Any other suggestions how to go from here are welcome as well. Thanks.

Dennis

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-T720 met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2023, 11:48 AM   #73
Brian
Senior Member
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 3,828
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

steel pistons!
to remove the oil pump, after undoing the one bolt that holds it into place, use a big wrench on the body of the pump to twist it for sideways, this will break the bond that has formed and allow you to then lift the pump up and out
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit!
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2023, 12:00 PM   #74
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,743
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

As Brian stated, a twist can get things moving. Remove the flywheel first so you have more elbow room. A clockwise twist will assist removal if the shaft is tight due to the helix on the gears. A good pipe wrench is useful for turning the pump. Be careful and only apply moderate force. You can break the pumps.

Mart.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2023, 02:50 AM   #75
hoss73ford
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 142
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

I thought '36s were still babbitt pounders? Not many around who still do babbitt work.
hoss73ford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2023, 03:18 AM   #76
deuce lover
Senior Member
 
deuce lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,301
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

Insert mains were introduced by Ford in '36,(mid year?).
deuce lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2023, 02:38 PM   #77
sjaakslinger
Member
 
sjaakslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 83
Default Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??

We have most of the engine apart now. Almost time to have it thoroughly inspected and magnafluxed. We did find a small hole in 1 of the connecting rod journals. No idea if this can be fixed, our rebuilder will tell, but I'd appreciate any ideas here.

We're getting to the point (assuming the engine is rebuildable) where we have to figure out what to reuse and what to replace. Any advice is welcome here. The car is 36 Touring Sedan which most probably will stay as original as possible. No big exterior and interior upgrade, just drive it with the worn patina look. So we're thinking of keeping the engine basic, no big pimpin' here. Bit of a budget rebuild, as far as possible.

The 221 had steel dome pistons. A quick search tells me those aren't the cheapest and not widely available. Aluminum good enough?

The connecting rods....reuse if possible?

Valves are shot...will be replaced. The non-mushroom type? Our rebuilder already suggested the adjustable tappets/lifters. Pros/cons?

Water pumps, oil pump and fuel pump....(self) rebuild?

I guess the ring gear is shot (see pic)?

Thanks.

Dennis

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-T720 met Tapatalk
sjaakslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 AM.