|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-19-2015, 04:19 AM | #61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South of I-40
Posts: 379
|
Re: O.T. Biggest Pet Peeve In pre 1953...
1. Mustang II front ends on open fender cars.
2. The entire Rat Rod concept.. |
07-19-2015, 08:23 PM | #62 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Powell, TN
Posts: 2,508
|
Re: O.T. Biggest Pet Peeve In pre 1953...
The "restored" 32-4 pickups with wood floors..........pure crap.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
07-19-2015, 09:01 PM | #63 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
|
Re: O.T. Biggest Pet Peeve In pre 1953...
Ya the modern 80s tilt stearing wheel always says to me. How am I going to fix that...
There are some good aftermarket products available to give you the driving "experience" and safety, if that's what your looking for, but without looking like crap. |
07-20-2015, 01:49 PM | #64 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Callahan Fla
Posts: 1,149
|
Re: O.T. Biggest Pet Peeve In pre 1953...
That may be true but only 31 is hidden in there logo.
__________________
Wanted, a car with a " Dynaflex Superflowing Unijet Turbovasculator which is Syncromeshed to the Multicoil Hydrotensioned Dual vacuum Dynomometer. " |
07-20-2015, 02:22 PM | #65 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wheaton, IL near Chicago
Posts: 861
|
Re: O.T. Biggest Pet Peeve In pre 1953...
|
07-20-2015, 02:53 PM | #66 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Fayetteville , NC
Posts: 12
|
Re: O.T. Biggest Pet Peeve In pre 1953...
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Oh well different strokes for different folks. |
07-20-2015, 03:07 PM | #67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,593
|
Re: O.T. Biggest Pet Peeve In pre 1953...
Not really HAMB material either, suggest street rod forums, HAMB is more "traditional" hot rod than street rod. This part of this forum is pointed towards the flathead years. And mostly stock stuff at that. Sure it's evolved to encompass built flatheads and some old style modifications. Still mostly stock Ford's from the flathead years.
Martin. |
07-21-2015, 03:24 AM | #68 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 1,575
|
Re: O.T. Biggest Pet Peeve In pre 1953...
I hate the rubberband tire and wheel combination some use. My '51 Merc. is stock and Flathead powered. My '30 coupe is chopped, channeled, and Has a Y-Block in it with a 9" Ford rear, C-4 auto, '36 dash 32 grill and shell. All Ford except the tail lights and they were on it when I bought it. they are Pontiac. I prefer 46-48 Ford tail lights
|
07-21-2015, 06:19 AM | #69 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Enfield Connecticut
Posts: 559
|
Re: O.T. Biggest Pet Peeve In pre 1953...
Quote:
|
|
07-21-2015, 06:39 AM | #70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 259
|
Re: O.T. Biggest Pet Peeve In pre 1953...
Last night was the Best...2015 Mustang with Wide whites........just as lame as this |
07-21-2015, 11:02 AM | #71 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 12
|
Re: O.T. Biggest Pet Peeve In pre 1953...
I'm glad for the streetrodders...Their castaways add more usable vintage parts to the mix...I'm looking around locally now for a running flathead for my 34 Pickup. Someone will yank one in favor of a 350 soon enough. And they're paying the bills so I don't care what they build. Everything can usually be un-done down the road anyway...
I do have a major dislike of Ratrods....absolutely can't stand them. Not talking about unfinished or primered nicely built traditional hot rods, but the ones with scary welds, wrenches for steering arms, barbed wire, diamond plate and expanded metal all over....and skulls...lots of skulls. |
07-21-2015, 11:49 AM | #72 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: MA
Posts: 888
|
Re: O.T. Biggest Pet Peeve In pre 1953...
How bout the guy who brings 2013 vette (looked like from car lot to car show) then looks at flathead and says "those run hot and are slow"
SO?????
__________________
Thanks - 30-9 1939, 1940 |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|