|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-10-2022, 12:50 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 202
|
1940 brake shoe differences
Hi,
I have three different designs of shoes. The black set has ford script on both shoes, both shoes identical. The second set of fronts have Ford script on one shoe, the shoes are slightly different. Third set (with the e brake), no script, part that goes into wheel cylinder is thicker. I am planning to drop a set off to be relined for my rear brakes. I am thinking the brown set without the e brake is a correct pair? Set 2 Thanks |
03-10-2022, 01:01 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,482
|
Re: 1940 brake shoe differences
There was a post here about the point into the wheel cyls being wrong on some newer shoes. Newc
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
03-10-2022, 01:07 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 202
|
Re: 1940 brake shoe differences
I have read about aftermarket stuff being off. That is why I am concerned. I also thought that the forward shoe was different?
|
03-10-2022, 09:28 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 8,990
|
Re: 1940 brake shoe differences
The shoes themselves (forward or rearward) are identical. The shoes are also identical front axle to rear axle.
The length of lining is different. The forward shoe has a longer lining than the rearward shoe. There are many aftermarket shoes that are too thick. The issue this additional thickness creates is at the bottom - where the plate captures the shoe(s). The plate will cause the shoes to bind. I'd strongly suggest you have the Ford script shoes lined. If you must use other than Ford shoes, measure the thickness at the lower area I'd mentioned and compare to a Ford shoe.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
03-10-2022, 09:39 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 202
|
Re: 1940 brake shoe differences
The thing that concerns me on the black Ford script pair is the lining is the same length? They have been relined.
|
03-10-2022, 02:03 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,745
|
Re: 1940 brake shoe differences
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
03-10-2022, 02:43 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 8,990
|
Re: 1940 brake shoe differences
Mart is correct (post #6). Apparently, whomever had lined the shoes did not do so properly.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
03-10-2022, 04:11 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 202
|
Re: 1940 brake shoe differences
Is there a length that they should be cut to?
Thanks |
03-10-2022, 04:37 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,745
|
Re: 1940 brake shoe differences
Just cut it back so there is as much sitting past the next rivet as there is now sitting past the last rivet.
I showed me rivetting some linings in one of my videos. It might help you see where the shoes need cutting back to. https://youtu.be/hd5C2QC6cxQ?t=706 Mart. |
03-11-2022, 12:06 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 202
|
Re: 1940 brake shoe differences
Mart,
That did help. The rear shoe lining is way shorter. Funny that I have three sets off two different cars and all the linings were the same size. |
03-11-2022, 11:41 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: sw minnesota
Posts: 4,568
|
Re: 1940 brake shoe differences
I too have seen lots of sets of shoes the same size, perhaps cheaper aftermarket parts, I don't know. While Henry probably designed them correctly, I highly doubt you would notice any difference in braking with both shoes long. I would have just put them on myself.
|
03-11-2022, 04:32 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 3,829
|
Re: 1940 brake shoe differences
I think the reason for different length linings is to equalise the wear; the front linings do more braking than the rear, consequently have longer linings.
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit! |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|