Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2022, 12:50 AM   #1
Duke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 202
Default 1940 brake shoe differences

Hi,
I have three different designs of shoes.
The black set has ford script on both shoes, both shoes identical.

The second set of fronts have Ford script on one shoe, the shoes are slightly different.

Third set (with the e brake), no script, part that goes into wheel cylinder is thicker.

I am planning to drop a set off to be relined for my rear brakes. I am thinking the brown set without the e brake is a correct pair? Set 2

Thanks
Duke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 01:01 AM   #2
Newc
Senior Member
 
Newc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,482
Default Re: 1940 brake shoe differences

There was a post here about the point into the wheel cyls being wrong on some newer shoes. Newc
Newc is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 03-10-2022, 01:07 AM   #3
Duke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 202
Default Re: 1940 brake shoe differences

I have read about aftermarket stuff being off. That is why I am concerned. I also thought that the forward shoe was different?
Duke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 09:28 AM   #4
Kube
Senior Member
 
Kube's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 8,990
Default Re: 1940 brake shoe differences

The shoes themselves (forward or rearward) are identical. The shoes are also identical front axle to rear axle.
The length of lining is different. The forward shoe has a longer lining than the rearward shoe.
There are many aftermarket shoes that are too thick. The issue this additional thickness creates is at the bottom - where the plate captures the shoe(s). The plate will cause the shoes to bind.
I'd strongly suggest you have the Ford script shoes lined. If you must use other than Ford shoes, measure the thickness at the lower area I'd mentioned and compare to a Ford shoe.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you".
Kube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 09:39 AM   #5
Duke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 202
Default Re: 1940 brake shoe differences

The thing that concerns me on the black Ford script pair is the lining is the same length? They have been relined.
Duke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 02:03 PM   #6
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,745
Default Re: 1940 brake shoe differences

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Linings can be cut back to the next rivet if they have all been fitted at the long length.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 02:43 PM   #7
Kube
Senior Member
 
Kube's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 8,990
Default Re: 1940 brake shoe differences

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke View Post
The thing that concerns me on the black Ford script pair is the lining is the same length? They have been relined.
Mart is correct (post #6). Apparently, whomever had lined the shoes did not do so properly.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you".
Kube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 04:11 PM   #8
Duke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 202
Default Re: 1940 brake shoe differences

Is there a length that they should be cut to?
Thanks
Duke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 04:37 PM   #9
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,745
Default Re: 1940 brake shoe differences

Just cut it back so there is as much sitting past the next rivet as there is now sitting past the last rivet.

I showed me rivetting some linings in one of my videos. It might help you see where the shoes need cutting back to.

https://youtu.be/hd5C2QC6cxQ?t=706

Mart.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2022, 12:06 AM   #10
Duke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 202
Default Re: 1940 brake shoe differences

Mart,
That did help. The rear shoe lining is way shorter. Funny that I have three sets off two different cars and all the linings were the same size.
Duke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2022, 11:41 AM   #11
cas3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: sw minnesota
Posts: 4,568
Default Re: 1940 brake shoe differences

I too have seen lots of sets of shoes the same size, perhaps cheaper aftermarket parts, I don't know. While Henry probably designed them correctly, I highly doubt you would notice any difference in braking with both shoes long. I would have just put them on myself.
cas3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2022, 04:32 PM   #12
Brian
Senior Member
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 3,829
Default Re: 1940 brake shoe differences

I think the reason for different length linings is to equalise the wear; the front linings do more braking than the rear, consequently have longer linings.
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit!
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM.