|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-14-2019, 11:53 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,463
|
Cylinder Head Flatness
How much is the maximum usable run-out of flatness across the length and across the width of a cylinder head?
__________________
Bob Bidonde |
06-14-2019, 12:05 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 8,099
|
Re: Cylinder Head Flatness
Three thousands .
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
06-14-2019, 12:59 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 7,225
|
Re: Cylinder Head Flatness
Yep, and .002" width
|
06-15-2019, 08:06 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,463
|
Re: Cylinder Head Flatness
Purdy & Patrick,
Thanks for your replies. The cylinder head is somewhat flexible and it clamps-up on a compressible gasket, so I suspect that the usable run-out of flatness can be more. 0.003" & 0.002" are what I would expect on a new head or one that is fresh out of a machine shop. My intuitive thought is that 0.010" along the length and 0.005 across the width of a used cylinder head can be run successfully.
__________________
Bob Bidonde |
06-15-2019, 10:17 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,087
|
Re: Cylinder Head Flatness
.006" is acceptable to my way of thinking, that's the guide we used when I was working on trucks.
|
06-15-2019, 11:02 AM | #6 |
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,262
|
Re: Cylinder Head Flatness
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
06-15-2019, 11:29 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,463
|
Re: Cylinder Head Flatness
Railcarmover,
You make a good point that the clamp-up force is low for the amount of torque (50-55 lbs-ft). The chart is from a study I found online. Note how little of the torque goes to clamp-up. I have installed many used stock cylinder heads, and not once did I have one resurfaced. I never measured the run-out of flatness of any of the used heads. To date, I have experienced gasket burn-throughs between Cylinders 3 & 4, but these were from using big-bore gaskets. The only other issue I've had is leakage from a new technology synthetic gasket with a new 5.5:1 head. I am hoping that a Model A'er or two who have measured and used a head with a significant run out will share their experiences with us.
__________________
Bob Bidonde |
06-15-2019, 01:16 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 7,225
|
Re: Cylinder Head Flatness
The head could have been cut and installed by now.
|
06-15-2019, 01:49 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,408
|
Re: Cylinder Head Flatness
Quote:
I use zero, just like the factory. There were no leaks or problems when they were new. |
|
06-15-2019, 08:18 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 27,582
|
Re: Cylinder Head Flatness
I'd want .002" or less across the width, and .004" or less along the length, and set .003" and .006" as the outer limits.
Remember, there is a lot of distance between the studs, beside the low clamping torque. |
06-16-2019, 09:12 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,426
|
Re: Cylinder Head Flatness
Folks have to remember that the decks also have some flexibility in places. The more warpage the head has, the more it forces warpage into the deck. When head warpage is relatively easy to correct, I wouldn't see a good reason to leave it that way. If the head has been shaved too far, get a better used head or get one of the new ones.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|