Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2019, 05:51 PM   #21
Riff Raff
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete View Post
I would spend about $60 US and get a sonic test gauge from Ebay and test it myself.
Ebay number : 31204599171 is an example.
That's a great idea!
Which are the critical areas to test?
Riff Raff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2019, 10:14 PM   #22
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,408
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riff Raff View Post
That's a great idea!
Which are the critical areas to test?
I check at 45 degree intervals, one inch increments from top to bottom.
Pete is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 03-07-2019, 09:26 AM   #23
Riff Raff
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Thanks Pete!
Riff Raff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2019, 12:54 PM   #24
Tim Ayers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,177
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Can either Pete or Riff Raff include the link for that sonic tester on Ebay? I tried putting in the number, but nothing came up.

Thanks! I'd really appreciate it.
Tim Ayers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2019, 01:05 PM   #25
big job
Senior Member
 
big job's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Dighton, Mass
Posts: 1,230
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

clean up the bores and sleeve it. Its only a briggs & stratton with 7 more cylinders with
forgiving low compression then drive it......................
big job is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2019, 01:50 PM   #26
Kurt in NJ
Senior Member
 
Kurt in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,158
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Post some pictures of what the bore looks like
Kurt in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2019, 01:57 PM   #27
40 Deluxe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,779
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Ayers View Post
Can either Pete or Riff Raff include the link for that sonic tester on Ebay? I tried putting in the number, but nothing came up.

Thanks! I'd really appreciate it.

A caution on ebay sonic testers! There is a caution on some ads: "cannot measure cast iron due to its big crystalloid composition". This is on item # 202561250938, which appears identical to many other listings.
Another thing to consider is that most have a flat surface probe that does not completely match the curve of a cylinder wall. I found differing opinions on whether that is a problem or not.
Other testers on ebay say they do work on cast iron.
40 Deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2019, 03:22 PM   #28
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,408
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40 Deluxe View Post
A caution on ebay sonic testers! There is a caution on some ads: "cannot measure cast iron due to its big crystalloid composition". This is on item # 202561250938, which appears identical to many other listings.
Another thing to consider is that most have a flat surface probe that does not completely match the curve of a cylinder wall. I found differing opinions on whether that is a problem or not.
Other testers on ebay say they do work on cast iron.
That is something to look for.

As far as the curved or irregular surface, these gauges need to be used with a medium between the transducer face and the material to be tested.
Something gooey and stiff like lithium grease or water pump grease.
Butter will work. Peanut butter will work..

As far as finding them on eBay, just type in the search, "ultrasonic test gauge".
Pete is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2019, 04:12 PM   #29
Tim Ayers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,177
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete View Post
That is something to look for.

As far as the curved or irregular surface, these gauges need to be used with a medium between the transducer face and the material to be tested.
Something gooey and stiff like lithium grease or water pump grease.
Butter will work. Peanut butter will work..

As far as finding them on eBay, just type in the search, "ultrasonic test gauge".
Thank you! I wonder if electrical wire pulling goop will work
Tim Ayers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2019, 04:18 PM   #30
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,408
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Ayers View Post
Thank you! I wonder if electrical wire pulling goop will work
As long as it does not "flow" when applied.
Pete is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2019, 10:30 AM   #31
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Or you go to the nearest medical supply place and get some ultrasonic gel...
I buy mine in 2l. plastic boxes.
Or you know someone at the hospital that gives you a cup...they use large amounts...
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2019, 10:35 AM   #32
19Fordy
Senior Member
 
19Fordy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,936
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riff Raff View Post
One more question: if the machining process hit a thin point and exposes the water jackets, can a sleeve save the block or it will be ruined?
I've heard that some diesel engines use wet sleeves, could that be a solution in that case?
Yes, I believe you can use a sleeve. Bore the engine as little as possible.
19Fordy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2019, 06:53 PM   #33
Riff Raff
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Thanks everyone for your responses!
After thinking a lot about it, I believe I will have the engine sleeved and use the pistons I already have.
I really think Pete's idea of buying a tester is great, but after the cost of the tester and the new pistons, my budget will be over the limit (considering the taxes I will have to pay, which more then doubles the price of each thing).
As much as I would love to go big bore, I think a stock flathead is better then no flathead, right?
Thanks again, and all the best to everyone!
Riff Raff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2019, 09:03 PM   #34
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

I think it's a reasonable cost effective way to approach it with how you explained your circumstances.

I don't think it's a bad anyways. Not to say other issues are not at hand down the road. Any flathead ford is better then no flathead ford.






.
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2019, 10:18 PM   #35
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,859
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Why not take a sledge to a bad block and measure some cylinders and check with a mike
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2019, 09:07 AM   #36
Riff Raff
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ol' Ron View Post
Why not take a sledge to a bad block and measure some cylinders and check with a mike
Tempting.
I do have a bad block and a sledge hammer.
Riff Raff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2019, 11:57 AM   #37
Riff Raff
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

After a lot of thinking, I decided to put my faith in Ol' Ron's words and went with the .125 Egge three ring pistons.
It was actually cheaper than sleeving all bores, and easier than finding the correct rings for the pistons I had.
Long story short: machine shop said all bores turned out OK, and I am very happy to have a big bore engine.
Can't wait to see it running.
Thanks for everyone’s advice!

But, machine shop had more bad news for me:
I bought an EAB cam and was hoping to use it, but turned out the journals have uneven wear: The first journal has std size and the last one has almost .030 wear.
Can I buy .030 cam bearings and use it or do I have a bad cam?
If it can be saved, where can I buy the .030 bearings?
Riff Raff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2019, 12:44 PM   #38
19Fordy
Senior Member
 
19Fordy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,936
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Sleeve it ,bore it and use the pistons you already have. You won't notice any noticeable performance difference if you go with the big bore option. And, like you say, good flat head blocks aren't plentiful where you are and costs of building an engine are so high. You don't need huge cubic inches to have a nice running flatty unless you're going to Bonneville. Not worth the risk or expense.
You answered your question when you said:
"Building this engine has been a long time dream and if I ruin this block I don’t think I can afford a new one, so I really need to be on the safe side.
Thanks!"
19Fordy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2019, 01:11 PM   #39
Riff Raff
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

19Fordy, you are right, but it turned out to be a lot cheaper to just go with the big bore.
Besides, the only sleeves I could find would need almost the same .125 bore to fit, so I thought I'd take the chance.
Any thoughts on the cam problem?
Riff Raff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2019, 01:18 PM   #40
Tim Ayers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,177
Default Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riff Raff View Post
19Fordy, you are right, but it turned out to be a lot cheaper to just go with the big bore.
Besides, the only sleeves I could find would need almost the same .125 bore to fit, so I thought I'd take the chance.
Any thoughts on the cam problem?
A few suggestions: If you must use it, send it to Pete or Delta cams to get the journals built up and resized.

Or, I think Tilden Technologies has an "improved" EAB cam they make or regrind. If you need a cam core for a regrind, I have a good 8RT cam I'd sell you cheap.

https://www.tildentechnologies.com/C...rformance.html
Tim Ayers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 PM.