|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-16-2020, 12:16 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,470
|
The Diamond Mark Challenge
Where did this myth about the "Diamond" marked engines and parts being superior to factory items come from. I think the diamond is a pattern maker's and or foundry trademark having nothing to do with the attributes of items bearing the "Diamond."
By the way, I have 2 Model "B" engines and some Model "A" parts with the infamous "Diamond" mark. I do not see any quality, functional or ruggedness differences in comparison to their original factory parts. I challenge anyone to show me facts / physical evidence / era literature that substantiates the "Diamond" mark has any worthwhile significance.
__________________
Bob Bidonde |
02-16-2020, 03:21 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,496
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
I'm all ears too.
__________________
I'm part of the only ever generation with an analogue childhood and a digital adulthood. |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
02-16-2020, 03:43 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,159
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
what i see is a original A block has a X reinforcement under the stud in the center, diamond blocks have none ---most diamond blocks have exhaust seat inserts
|
02-16-2020, 04:19 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,375
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
I have yet to come across a diamond "A" block but have been through a number of diamond "B" blocks that were beyond restoration because of casting flaws, mainly core shifts that resulted in thin walls in the upper deck, valve pockets, and the roof of the valve chamber. Cracks running everywhere. Try to pin a crack and new ones form at the periphery. The original Ford produced "B" blocks have their issues as well. Since most all of my "B" engines spent their lives in an industrial application it is possible that they were not always well maintained. All told, I found one repairable diamond "B" block out of 7 that were hot-tanked and magnefluxed - not a good record.
As far as the diamond "B" blocks are concerned, my take is that their claimed superiority is a myth. |
02-16-2020, 04:36 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auburn Washington
Posts: 2,552
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
I have had three diamond A blocks, two came out of tugs that I had bought, that were used on the water front. none of the three had exhaust seat inserts.
|
02-16-2020, 04:55 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: albany
Posts: 466
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
02-17-2020, 07:21 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Central Maine
Posts: 644
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
Vince Falter has quite a bit of information on diamond blocks on his Ford Garage site. Check it out. I have a diamond block in my '29, certainly a replacement as the casting date is either '35 or '37. ( away from home now and can't check ) Runs just fine and has for years. Bill
|
02-17-2020, 12:02 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,088
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
The diamond is a foundry mark, most, if not all were made after regular production, up to the war years. All were not the same, I have one diamond B block that was extremely thin in #3 exhaust port, another was ported to 1 3/4" and was still serviceable. The mark was A & B blocks, heads bell housings and on rear bearing (transmission) retainers and probably more??? They came with no serial number from the factory, most were used commercially. Were they better? They were newer, and most had exhaust seat inserts.
|
02-17-2020, 03:15 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fountain Valley, Calif.
Posts: 937
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
My 1930 Town Sedan has a diamond block, but have no idea if it was original. It also has standard valve seats.....
|
02-17-2020, 05:24 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Chillicothe, Missouri
Posts: 1,176
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
I have a Model A Diamond Block and head.casting date is very hard to read but looks like 37
__________________
"If I asked people what they wanted they would have said faster horses." -Henry Ford "Primitive technology is not a design flaw" 1928 Ford Model A Roadster Pickup 1930 Gordon Smith Air Compressor 1941 Willy's Pickup 1960 Thunderbird-For Sale 1964 Buick Riviera 2x4 425 1965 Pontiac GTO, 455 Super Duty 2004 Dodge Ram SRT-10, V-10 Viper 1977 Charger Jet Boat,460 Ford,Jacuzzi Jet Front Engine Nostalgia Dragster,Supercharged 296 "Fullrace Flathead" Ford Engine Build up on DVD ask |
02-18-2020, 11:58 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cow Hampshire
Posts: 4,188
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
I think for a while everyone thought that a diamond mark somehow affirmed "better quality?"
Now perhaps not so? I have seen diamond blocks sell for premium over a regular block. Well, I have seen diamond blocks ASK a premium. I'm not sure I would bother. IMHO, the most "bulletproof" blocks seem to be motherhood & apple pie "A" blocks from the original production. My B "Gordon Smith" compressor (no counterweights) suffers from deck cracks on cylinders 2 and 3 - and this seems common for B - although the block may have been chosen for the GS Head BECAUSE it developed cracks. Joe K
__________________
Shudda kept the horse. |
02-18-2020, 02:30 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,436
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
Ford farmed out almost all replacement casting stuff after normal production of parts ended. Model A & B blocks were used in industrial & agricultural related applications long after the automobiles that used them had stopped production. I've only seen foundry marks on replacement transmission cases but not on engine block castings other then the diamond. Those that I have seen had the distinctive marking of Fairmount Tool and Forging Division of Houdaille Industries of Cleveland, OH but there were likely others too. Ford Motor Company seldom ever counted on any one supplier.
|
02-18-2020, 03:08 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hangtown, CA
Posts: 556
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
I have a diamond block with the exhaust seats. I don't know if all diamond blocks had them. It may be difficult to see them unless you have the block decked.
|
02-18-2020, 07:01 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,436
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
Not all had them.
|
02-18-2020, 08:39 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Big Pine,CA
Posts: 161
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
I think the diamond was put on all motors, A and B that where Industrial motors not to be put in autos but work horses. I could be wrong but I think I read that somewhere
|
02-18-2020, 09:14 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Washington
Posts: 175
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
I wasn't aware that there was any difference.
|
02-19-2020, 09:37 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,436
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
There were two foundries in Cleveland Ohio that used a diamond casting mark. I always wondered if either of them were involved with these blocks. There is blind theory and then there is consensus among experienced folks in the restoration hobby. After 1933, Ford was busy casting V8 blocks so it's doubtful that they wanted to cast more 4-cylinder blocks if they didn't have to. Ford Motor Company certainly built up 4-cylinder engines through the 30s & early 40s for replacements and industrial/agricultural customers but that doesn't mean that they fabricated all the parts in house. Low production fabrication was farmed out a lot.
|
02-23-2020, 10:11 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,470
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
So far, I see no factory documentation or aftermarket testing that substantiates that "Diamond" blocks and parts are more rugged and or function better than OEM parts.
Thus in the market place, the "Diamond" should not add any $$ value to blocks and or parts with the "Diamond."
__________________
Bob Bidonde |
02-23-2020, 12:18 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: 34.22 N 118.36 W
Posts: 1,056
|
Re: The Diamond Mark Challenge
Bob,
You are probably correct about the value perceived of the Diamond castings. But, someone could perceive that the Diamond block is more valuable just due to the age of the casting from the 40's, vs the 20's. IMHO, a good block isn't just based on the date of manufacture, rather it is the condition and not having some questionable machining performed on it. John
__________________
As Carroll Smith wrote; All Failures are Human in Origin. |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|