|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-12-2018, 11:13 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Cave Junction, Oregon
Posts: 432
|
Why no lock-washers?
This is not just an weird question like I sometimes ask. It is a very important question that deserves a really good answer.
Every time I’ve checked the nuts on the intake-exhaust manifold on my A, they could be tightened more. If I remember correctly, the head bolt nuts on a model A have to be tightened on a regular basis. It seems that everything that does not have a lock-washer has to be tightened periodically. Why weren’t lock-washers used in all these places? I don’t care if they were split-washers, star-washers, or even bell-compression washers. Why wasn’t something used to keep those nuts from working loose as that engine heated and cooled. If there is a good reason why they weren’t used, I’d really like to know. Mike |
02-12-2018, 11:25 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 970
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
Lock washers stop the nuts from backing off. That is not the issue with the head nuts. The issue is that the head gasket is compressing with heat cycles, will stop after about 4 heat cycles. As the gasket thickness shrinks the nuts must be snugged.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
02-12-2018, 11:26 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 5,903
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
I have always thought that it isn’t that they work loose, it’s that the high temps on the manifold cause the metals to expand and contract which changes their relative fitment. On the head I have assumed it was the head gasket getting settled in. No science here, just my assumptions.
__________________
Ray Horton, Portland, OR As you go through life, keep your eye on the donut, not the hole. |
02-12-2018, 11:27 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 5,903
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
100IH got up one minute earlier than I did.
__________________
Ray Horton, Portland, OR As you go through life, keep your eye on the donut, not the hole. |
02-12-2018, 11:40 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Cave Junction, Oregon
Posts: 432
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
OK, I accept the fact that the head gasket compresses. All gaskets compress including the intake-exhaust gasket.
But still, why were no lockwashers used. You would think that in any situation were there is metal expanding and contracting a lockwasher would be used to lock that nut in place especially a place as important as the manifolds. Mike |
02-12-2018, 12:14 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,087
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
02-12-2018, 12:56 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 970
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
Rust,the original Lock-Tite. You know that works !
|
02-12-2018, 12:56 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: southern California
Posts: 725
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
Heat cycling along with vibration will harden the lock washers, then they will become brittle, and then break.
__________________
"That's my wild unsubstantiated guess, and I'm sticking to it regardless of the facts!" |
02-12-2018, 01:07 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,441
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
Why no lock washer? Here's one for the forum .....Because they don't work!... (find me some proof and I'll change my mind)
|
02-12-2018, 01:26 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Saint Cloud Mn
Posts: 745
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
apparently the engineers decided they were not needed. They were right.
|
02-12-2018, 01:29 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: southern California
Posts: 725
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
If you need a solution to exhaust manifold nuts backing off, you could use interference-fit brass nuts. This was a fairly common item and solution in years gone by. They would have cost a few cents more, so that's probably why Henry didn't use them
__________________
"That's my wild unsubstantiated guess, and I'm sticking to it regardless of the facts!" |
02-12-2018, 02:10 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Cave Junction, Oregon
Posts: 432
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
OK, guys. I agree with the probable leakage problem on head bolts due to lockwashers. I agree with the fact that lockwashers become brittle and break.
However, a bell or compression washer wouldn’t allow leakage and sure wouldn’t break. My god, you could even put Permatex under them and really seal that head when that bell was torqued down. I think they would even look good under the nuts. They would sure look better than a double nut. I’m not trying to be a wise-ass, but I really do think that there is a better way than just the nut. Mike |
02-12-2018, 02:29 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: orange co. ca.
Posts: 178
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
had lock washers been invented when model a's were new?
|
02-12-2018, 03:29 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: FRESNO, CA
Posts: 12,560
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
If you think something needs a lockwasher, PUT ONE ON!
Bill Ownman
__________________
"THE ASSISTANT GURU OF STUFF" |
02-12-2018, 03:49 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South East NJ
Posts: 3,398
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
Two thoughts..
First as mentioned, the heat cycling and the type of metal used for a lock washer would not work. Second, not needed. I would guess that Ford used tight tolerance threading here also. So the nuts would be kind of snug. I do not know if those are the right answers, but I am guessing that Ford had a good engineering reason they were not needed. |
02-12-2018, 04:18 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 2,975
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
We use to build hyd cylinders up to 24 inch bore. Never used lock washers on the tie rods or pistons. If you torque to the popper torque the bolts or studs will not come loose, they stretch and hold a constant pressure what ever they are used for.
cars do not use lock washers on the connecting rods or main bearings or cylinder heads. |
02-12-2018, 04:20 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central, IL
Posts: 3,968
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
I have backed off some old nuts on model A parts before and the lock washers are either A flat or B crumble into bits undoing the nut.
Yes lock washers job is to prevent stuff from turning but heat cycles it does not prevent. Ive put nuts in a vice and tighten them till i just barely see the nut squash. By the time you release it will spring most of the way back but it will be an interference fit .
__________________
1929 Model AA - Need long splash aprons! |
02-12-2018, 04:29 PM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: southern California
Posts: 725
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
Quote:
__________________
"That's my wild unsubstantiated guess, and I'm sticking to it regardless of the facts!" |
|
02-12-2018, 04:32 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: southern California
Posts: 725
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
Quote:
I have found that the harder the split lock washer (Grade 8 for example), the faster it looses its spring and easier it is to break.
__________________
"That's my wild unsubstantiated guess, and I'm sticking to it regardless of the facts!" |
|
02-12-2018, 07:43 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Spokane, Washington state
Posts: 250
|
Re: Why no lock-washers?
I believe the Henry design accounted for several things. The washers on the exhaust manifold are curved and also very thick. When you tighten a nut onto a stud with a flat washer it is normal torque, but if tightening a curved dome shaped washer it introduces extra push back force on the nut (sort of like a lock washer). The thickness and correct cast material reduces the risk for brittle heat breakage as parts have similar thermodynamic characteristics.
Just saying there may be very good reasons. I can imagine that the engineers were doing a good job and did a lot of testing. I try to go original.
__________________
68B frame# late May1930, fixed seat, Briggs build plate# & most parts, indicate July, or early Aug. 1930. |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|