|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-10-2019, 03:03 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Farmington MI
Posts: 284
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
And Dad and I used to laugh at his story of having to tow his "A" around the block after doing a (not so good) bearing job on the engine. This, back in the early 40's when he was an aspiring shade tree mechanic.
Joe B |
09-10-2019, 03:12 PM | #42 |
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,262
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
Ford used over 40 different steel designs during the model a .They sampled during a heat and tested after cooling and treatment,employing the largest number electric furnaces in the world in the upset and spring shop..brinell hardness was just one of them..they even performed failure analysis..
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
09-10-2019, 03:45 PM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 8,099
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
I've read that some are considering increasing the clearance on the rear main bearing to three thousands . the rear main bearing is around an inch longer than the front and center main bearings .
|
09-10-2019, 04:50 PM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,779
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
I've read that this extra clearance is a 'crutch' to keep from seizing the rear main in an inserted engine. Anything to that?
|
09-10-2019, 05:46 PM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 7,225
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
I've had too many bearings rattle at .003" [ every day engines]
On the 'A' I tend to tighten the rear bearing a bit more thinking helps with leakage. Where another engines, such as big block Chrysler's, I increase the rear clearance [.0035"] which helps with rear flange breakage under hard use. |
09-10-2019, 09:23 PM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Campbell,CA, USA
Posts: 319
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
My copy of A-6015 has EI 12403 3/28/1929 incorporated with no Brinell hardness mentioned. Your copy of A-6015 has EI 13436 7/10/1929 incorporated with the Brinell hardness note added. |
09-10-2019, 09:43 PM | #47 |
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,262
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
Ford was teaching Brinell and Rockwell hardness testing techniques to trade school boys in 1934..
|
09-10-2019, 09:45 PM | #48 |
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,262
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
|
09-11-2019, 11:11 AM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,426
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
The only way to affect a specific hardness on the old cast iron formula was to carefully control what was added in the mix at the foundry. If you look at the note. It mentions taking a reading on a scrap block since the Brinell test leaves a larger mark than Rockwell. Casting technology is a lot different now than it was back then. They were trying to insure uniformity in the casting process. Ductile or "nodular" cast iron had not been developed yet.
|
09-11-2019, 11:27 AM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,087
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
I set all mains at .0025" on my inserted race engines, with a groove to feed the rear at 2 different spots. First I ever heard Patrick L's story about extra clearance helping rear flange breakage!
|
09-11-2019, 06:45 PM | #51 |
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,262
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
So the rear main starves? that the cause of failure? stands to reason.do you have a problem with rear main leakage with two grooves?
|
09-11-2019, 09:37 PM | #52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 2,975
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
If you use 0 clearance you will never get the engine to turn. If it would it would melt the babbitt, there would be no oil flow. O clearance is BS
|
09-11-2019, 10:22 PM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 60615,330th Ave.,Clare, Iowa, 50524
Posts: 1,457
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
|
09-11-2019, 11:05 PM | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 60615,330th Ave.,Clare, Iowa, 50524
Posts: 1,457
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
Quote:
The biggest cause of flange breakage, is that the Babbitt wasn't peened,, or lack of knowledge how to do it right. Many shops don't peen at all. I have also seen videos of peening, that should have been left to Luck. You have to peen the ends of the bearings also, the thrust. Herm. |
|
09-11-2019, 11:48 PM | #55 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Big pine Ca 93513
Posts: 797
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
Thanks for posting this ,I did not know it had been gone thru before..sc
|
09-12-2019, 05:32 AM | #56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 7,225
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
I raced for Chrysler for a number of years and built the engines. Sudden left off of power would snap the cranks at times at the rear flange. Increasing the rear main clearance stopped it. Also letting off on the power slower probably had a lot to do with it too. [smiley face]
|
09-12-2019, 09:55 AM | #57 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Bay City Michigan
Posts: 1,050
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
Quote:
there has to be some good stories. what years and what cars and classes? I always dreamed of racing cars as a kid still do. but im just a stiff with a job. I dreamed of f1 when I was a kid. I have a loose plan to get a used fwd race car for the beginner class at the local circle track when the kids grow up. |
|
09-12-2019, 10:04 AM | #58 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Bay City Michigan
Posts: 1,050
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
in the video where he gets its going it doesn't drag much. he states some thing like 120lbs of force required to turn it. just lets off a short chirp and is rolling over. I would say my well broken in engine takes about 50lbs to move the crank. not measured so that could be way off.
|
09-12-2019, 11:48 AM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,087
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
Railcarmover, I'm not sure the rear bearing would run dry, just don't want to chance it. On my insert engine I run a 1-piece Burtz seal, and it stays dry. I also run a babbitted mains engine on the salt using a rope seal, and it drips a little but not much. Ran 167 mph on babbitt in 2013, no problems with the engine, just turbo failure, so no record.
|
09-12-2019, 02:03 PM | #60 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 7,225
|
Re: babbit tolerance? .000?
Quote:
There are some good stories/memories. But,,,, Last edited by Patrick L.; 09-12-2019 at 03:48 PM. |
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|