Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-26-2018, 10:48 AM   #1
braol
Senior Member
 
braol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Endeavor, WI
Posts: 119
Default .027" or .035"

The Owner's manual says plugs should be at .027" gap but the Les Andrews book says .035". I have a 1931 Tudor...stock. Any thoughts from you pros out there?
__________________
"I have not yet begun to defile myself."
-Doc Holliday
'31 Tudor, '69 F100, '66 Mustang, '11 Ford Flex
braol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2018, 10:57 AM   #2
gustafson
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 128
Default Re: .027" or .035"

unfortunately there are many errors in the Andrews books
gustafson is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 07-26-2018, 10:58 AM   #3
George Miller
Senior Member
 
George Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 2,975
Default Re: .027" or .035"

The wider the gap the stronger the spark. But there is a point when it can no longer jump the gap. Pus it will take easies path just like we do. I say .032
George Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2018, 11:04 AM   #4
WHN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Connecticut Shoreline
Posts: 1,823
Default Re: .027" or .035"

Have used .35 for almost 60 years.
WHN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2018, 11:14 AM   #5
J Franklin
Senior Member
 
J Franklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,963
Default Re: .027" or .035"

I use .035. and .027 with a high compression head
J Franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2018, 12:05 PM   #6
Bob C
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,750
Default Re: .027" or .035"

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Page 454 of the Service Bulletins states "the spark plug gap has been changed
from .027" to .035"."


Bob
Bob C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2018, 12:12 PM   #7
braol
Senior Member
 
braol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Endeavor, WI
Posts: 119
Default Re: .027" or .035"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob C View Post
Page 454 of the Service Bulletins states "the spark plug gap has been changed
from .027" to .035"."Bob

That settles it! Awesome.
__________________
"I have not yet begun to defile myself."
-Doc Holliday
'31 Tudor, '69 F100, '66 Mustang, '11 Ford Flex
braol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2018, 12:20 PM   #8
Corley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Battle Ground WA
Posts: 293
Default Re: .027" or .035"

Are you 6v or 12v? A good 12v system should easily support .035". If you are still 6v, you might want to stay around .030", though I've run .035" on 6v without trouble. Tighter gap, easier to fowel, bigger gap more chance of missfire, and hard start if on 6v system. Everything is a trade off, there is no one "right" answer.
__________________
Corley
-----------------
Subscribed to the KISS principle!
Corley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2018, 12:26 PM   #9
gustafson
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 128
Default Re: .027" or .035"

exactly
engineering has advanced since the days of the SBs
gustafson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2018, 12:49 PM   #10
MikeK
Senior Member
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Windy City
Posts: 2,919
Default Re: .027" or .035"

The spark in a Kettering system is a function of coil impedance ratio and current density. Primary voltage, 3,6,12,24V is not related to the output energy or voltage at which the coil will discharge that energy across a plug gap.

The Minimum discharge voltage across a plug gap is determined by the atmosphere in the gap (compression ratio and water content of the air), condition of the electrodes (clean, sharp edges), and surrounding field ionization.

With the extremely low compression of an A, even with a 6:1 head, which is LOW, clean plugs will fire reliably on 6V Kettering system at much more than 0.035" gap. Thus the very conservative 35 in the service bulletins.

All the talk about smaller gaps is a carryover from non-inertia start magneto systems that produce a much lower output at cranking speed than a Kettering system.

Last edited by MikeK; 07-26-2018 at 10:03 PM.
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2018, 02:03 PM   #11
Purdy Swoft
Senior Member
 
Purdy Swoft's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 8,099
Default Re: .027" or .035"

Quote:
Originally Posted by WHN View Post
Have used .35 for almost 60 years.

I agree!!! I have also used a gap of .035 for my model A's and other cars with points ignition for nearly 60 years with good results . Like Bob C said , Ford changed the gap from .027 to .035 . Too much gap with weak ignition can shorten coil life . I run the Pertronix flame thrower coil . An original model A coil can easily handle a gap of .035 or even more .
Purdy Swoft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2018, 06:25 PM   #12
redmodelt
Senior Member
 
redmodelt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 6,340
Default Re: .027" or .035"

Bob C has it, we just talked about this today at the shop.
__________________
I know the voices aren't real but damn they have some good ideas!
redmodelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2018, 06:39 PM   #13
pgerhardt
Senior Member
 
pgerhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Danbury Ct
Posts: 1,254
Default Re: .027" or .035"

The coil type can make a difference. I switched from the unknown brand 6V coil that was on my car, to a original slant pole coil that a friend spotted (I sent him picture of one, so he knew what to look for.) and picked up for me at Hersey, because it was more appropriate for my 29 tudor. Well you could practically hear my car sigh when I first started it with the slant pole! It started quicker, idled better, and generally had more pep. Like Model A Viagra!
pgerhardt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2018, 10:05 PM   #14
gustafson
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 128
Default Re: .027" or .035"

The fact remains that it requires a higher voltage to fire a lean mixture, and A Model A does not have a lean mixture compared to a modern vehicle


https://books.google.com/books?id=UP...ixture&f=false
gustafson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2018, 08:48 AM   #15
Corley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Battle Ground WA
Posts: 293
Default Re: .027" or .035"

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeK View Post
The spark in a Kettering system is a function of coil impedance ratio and current density. Primary voltage, 3,6,12,24V is not related to the output energy or voltage at which the coil will discharge that energy across a plug gap.

The Minimum discharge voltage across a plug gap is determined by the atmosphere in the gap (compression ratio and water content of the air), condition of the electrodes (clean, sharp edges), and surrounding field ionization.

With the extremely low compression of an A, even with a 6:1 head, which is LOW, clean plugs will fire reliably on 6V Kettering system at much more than 0.035" gap. Thus the very conservative 35 in the service bulletins.

All the talk about smaller gaps is a carryover from non-inertia start magneto systems that produce a much lower output at cranking speed than a Kettering system.
I would agree with this but... You are not taking into account a couple of items. First, a 6v system, with the high current required for starter motor, and if not pretty recently cleaned connection points throughout the electrical system, including grounds, often has little voltage left over for the ignition when starting, and can produce a less than desireable spark output. Second, many 6v coils in model As are eons old, and on their last legs, whereas most 12v systems will sport newer parts in better condition. Third, ANY resistance anywhere in the ignition wiring has a greater detrimental effect on a 6v system than it will have on a 12v system. And lastly, the resistance buildup of arcing points affects the higher current requirement of the 6v system more than that of a 12v system. This ain't rocket science, it's simple electrical facts.

However, if everything is kept up to snuff, .035 should not be a problem on a 6v car, and it should even be capable of wider gaps.

You are absolutely correct in saying that a 6v model A ignition system should work fine at .035 gap, but in my opinion, as an electrical engineer, a good condition 12v system can do even better. Much better.

Lean burn? Yes, that is one important reason high energy ignition systems were implimented in all regular cars, nothing to do with racing. Not in our scope of discussion, bringing that in is just adding confusion to a simple topic.
__________________
Corley
-----------------
Subscribed to the KISS principle!
Corley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2018, 09:58 AM   #16
DHZIEMAN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sunrise Beach, Mo
Posts: 439
Default Re: .027" or .035"

Had some ignition troubles with my purchased Model A. Got the plugs out, and the electrode ends were kind of worn and checked the gap and they varied from 045 to 050!

Replaced the plugs and read someplace a gap of 032 to 035! Set them there, found some other ignition stuff to fix and the car has been running good since then! Plugs are gapped at 032! (or were)
DHZIEMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2018, 03:46 AM   #17
old31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,098
Default Re: .027" or .035"

Quote:
Originally Posted by J Franklin View Post
I use .035. and .027 with a high compression head
J, i am curious. With a HC head wouldn't you use 35? Any reason to go to 27? I am asking because I have a hc head with 35.
old31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2018, 07:46 AM   #18
Corley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Battle Ground WA
Posts: 293
Default Re: .027" or .035"

Pretty sure he is just saying a higher compression ratio requires a hotter spark since the spark does not like to jump as well when under compression. Frankly, any head on a streetable model A engine is low enough CR for this to be a rather moot point. (Streetable infering not a super high performance racing engine.). If everything is sixes, Bob's your uncle with .035" on your model A.
__________________
Corley
-----------------
Subscribed to the KISS principle!
Corley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2018, 09:39 AM   #19
BILL WILLIAMSON
Senior Member
 
BILL WILLIAMSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: FRESNO, CA
Posts: 12,560
Default Re: .027" or .035"

Has everyone "MADE UP" & back to figuring out, "WHAT'S FOR BREAKFAST"???----Who cares what kind of coil you're running??? as long as it runs GOOD!
IF it doesn't run well, try painting the coil a DIFFERENT COLOR.
Bill & Dog Hungry
__________________
"THE ASSISTANT GURU OF STUFF"

Last edited by BILL WILLIAMSON; 07-28-2018 at 10:16 AM.
BILL WILLIAMSON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2018, 10:48 AM   #20
J Franklin
Senior Member
 
J Franklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,963
Default Re: .027" or .035"

The smaller gap with higher compression heads is just something I read and adopted. It works fine for me. Smooth running and never fouling.
J Franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.