|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-21-2020, 12:33 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 12
|
Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
I have a '46 Mercury and am trying to decide if I should purchase and install refurbished original style knee action shocks, or convert to tubular.
If going tubular are bolt on units available? So far I haven't located anything. Thanks, Ray Fournier |
06-21-2020, 01:14 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Massillon, Ohio
Posts: 783
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
Ray- It has been 10 years ago but I wondered about the same thing. I have a '41 Coupe. After asking the question to quite a few Ford guys the opinion I got was that the tubes were no better riding than the originals. I removed them during the winter and sent them to Houdaille for a rebuild. The car still rides just fine (for a '41).
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
06-21-2020, 01:28 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,159
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
48 had tubular, and there was a ford retrofit kit ---what are you lubricating your spring with?, springs and shocks have to work together, the fittings on the springs are for spring lube which is a thin oil and talc in suspension, grease will make the spring stiff, and block the passages to the tips of the leaves
|
06-21-2020, 01:52 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Dighton, Mass
Posts: 1,230
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
Although my shocks seem find but If I could find rear kits then I could put the coil helpers
only to raise rear about 2-3 inches.. I don't like tail draggers. Front 4 fingers (tire to fender) rear no fingers. rear spring looks good nothing worn may need rearched?? A Kit maybe air shocks...that would work:: Low rear will effect caster:: sam |
06-21-2020, 02:14 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 12
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
Apple Hydraulic seems to have a special if four shocks are purchased, four for $588. Maybe that is the way to go.
|
06-21-2020, 02:49 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,113
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
You are correct! But, by sitting lower, the caster is MORE POSITIVE (not a bad thing) by "ABOUT" 0.8291 degrees. By raising the rear of frame 3", caster will go LESS positive (back to stock again) by roughly 0.8291 degrees. So yeah, it'll affect the caster by slightly less than 7/8 of ONE degree. DD Wheelbase: 114" Axle C/L to wishbone ball C/L: 42.5" (approx.) Above ratio: 37.28% Raise rear at axle C/L: 3" |
06-21-2020, 07:51 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,316
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
Be careful of "Apple Hydraulics". Do a couple of internet searches before you decide to send them anything.
|
06-22-2020, 02:51 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Massillon, Ohio
Posts: 783
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
Tubman And the reason is.............?
|
06-22-2020, 03:06 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,113
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
Here's ONE example from a post last year. DD _____________________________________ 08-07-2019, 09:26 PM #15 john greco Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: tx Posts: 176 Re: Who rebuilding shocks now I sent back the same shock to apple 7 times , before it was fixed , 7 times , and it was $ 920. For the 4 , plus return shipping 4 times , never again |
06-22-2020, 03:22 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Massillon, Ohio
Posts: 783
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
OK. Thanks.
|
06-22-2020, 03:50 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,113
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
Here's THE preeminent shock-rebuilder guy that several here are using. Highly recommended! DD Andy Falandes is still rebuilding them. He took Bill Wzorek's business when Bill retired. andy falandes <[email protected]> |
06-22-2020, 04:29 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,006
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
The reason is they do crap work. They destroyed a rare set of concourse correct (early 39) shocks of mine. Destroyed, as in "junk".
When there's a guy like Andy out there doing GOOD, HONEST work at a fair price - why even consider anyone else?
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
06-22-2020, 05:00 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,101
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
I second Mike's recommendation as Andy is the go-to source for quality shock absorber restoration.
|
12-21-2021, 06:18 PM | #14 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Altamont, Kansas
Posts: 22
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
Just received my rebuilt (remanufactured and perfect) shocks for my 37 pickup from Andy Falandes. Perfect! I couldn't be happier with this Christmas present.
Thanks Andy. Bill Wyckoff |
12-21-2021, 11:01 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: elmira,ny
Posts: 1,517
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
On my '41 fordor I Installed chassis Eng. rear leaf springs which lowered the raer a couple inches. lowered front by removing every other leaf and tried all sorts of tube shocks. eventually settled on my original Houdailles. that was the best ride quality I could get. What i liked about the Houdailles was I could ad.j the shock stiffness any time I wanted.
|
05-15-2023, 12:20 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,306
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
Kudos to Andy Falandes,AKA andys.shoxs.com Just received a rebuilt rear pair for for a '35 Cabriolet for a friend here in France. We bought them outright since sending the cores off the car were cost prohibitive. They now are installed and owner of the '35 is very pleased.
Last edited by deuce lover; 05-15-2023 at 12:27 PM. |
05-15-2023, 01:03 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,795
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
I have used Andy Falandes for shock rebuilds, quick turn around and quality work. While I have never used Apple, I have heard too many bad things. I'm staying away from Apple.
|
05-15-2023, 07:33 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,024
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
I'm 6000 miles in on 4 shocks rebuilt by Andy. No leaks and they work great!
|
05-16-2023, 07:05 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,006
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
I would not allow Apple to wash my driveway much less touch any of my shocks.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
05-17-2023, 09:47 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Near Rising Sun, Maryland
Posts: 10,858
|
Re: Rebuld Vs Shock Conversion
I've managed to aquire a couple sets of the adaptors that would allow me to put tubular type shocks on my '35's. I didn't buy them intentionally....they just happened to come along with some collection's of part's I purchased or was given.
However, I do prefer using the original Houdaille shocks on my cars, and I don't know of anyone better than Andy Falandes to rebuild these original type shocks. I know he was personally trained very well by the late Bill Wzorek(RIP), and I have never heard of any problems with Andy's work.
__________________
John "Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams is more powerful than one with all the facts". Albert Einstein Last edited by JM 35 Sedan; 05-17-2023 at 12:55 PM. |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|