Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Late V8 (1954+)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-10-2013, 07:21 AM   #1
Motorhead6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orange Park, Fl
Posts: 406
Default Tea Pot Carburetor

I am installing a 4V manifold on my flathead in my '51 Vicky which requires the small base bolt pattern. I do not want to use an adapter for the larger carburetor as this looks a little odd to me. This desire limits me to an early GM WCFB or the Ford Holley 4000 series tea pot style carb. I have settled on the tea pot. I don't want to get into all of the hullaballoo about the fire hazards associated with this carburetor that we all know about.

That said, I have a couple of choices in that I have bought a '55, a '56 and a truck tea pot carb that has the governor. The one that seems to be in the best condition is the truck one.

My question(s):

1- Can the governor be removed and still let the carburetor be totally functional?

2- At what RPM range is the gevernor functional?

3- Is the governor adjustable, and if so, what is the procedure?

4- Is there a manual available that covers the truck and/or car models?

5- Will the 239 CID flatty flow enough air to operate the secondaries?

Thanks for your help.

VR, Motorhead
Motorhead6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 08:48 AM   #2
BERNIE G
Member
 
BERNIE G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Limerick, Maine
Posts: 40
Default Re: Tea Pot Carburetor

I agree the adapter looks odd. I put a 390 Holley on a 53 Flatty useing the adapter. I bolted the adapter to the carb, then rounded and shaped the adapter to look like it was part of the base. It looks natural on there. I mounted ihe Carb backwards to eliminate the throttle linkage issue(different sides). We have run it for years trouble free. Worth thinking about..
BERNIE G is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 02-10-2013, 10:30 AM   #3
Ole Don
Senior Member
 
Ole Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: St. Michael, Minnesota
Posts: 1,713
Default Re: Tea Pot Carburetor

Back in the day, my grandpa had a fleet of gravel haulers. The 55 and 56 F6 had 272's, governed at 4400 as I remember. The Lincoln based 302 and 332 was governed at 3600, but I didnt run my 332 that fast.
Ole Don is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 08:39 PM   #4
paul2748
Senior Member
 
paul2748's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Midland Park, NJ
Posts: 3,978
Default Re: Tea Pot Carburetor

If you are looking for a good rebuilder, contact Mike Suter in PA. He is an expert of the teapots and runs them after rebuild.
paul2748 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 05:38 AM   #5
KULTULZ
Senior Member
 
KULTULZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: IN A 'GALAXIE' FAR FAR AWAY
Posts: 6,465
Smile Re: Tea Pot Carburetor

I believe most fire hazards were concerning the dual four setups.

What you are trying to defeat is the LOAD-O-MATIC system. FORD went to the ported vacuum advance system in 1957. I had a stock 57 312 with a 4000 HOLLEY from the factory so it can be done.
__________________
*****

- WHY IS IT ... -

... that everything you buy in the grocery store is either wrapped in or contained in plastic but the government doesn't want you to carry it out in a plastic bag?

WONDERING IN W(BY GOD)V ...

DIAGNOSED CDO - (OCD In Correct Alphabetical Order)
KULTULZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 07:50 AM   #6
Motorhead6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orange Park, Fl
Posts: 406
Default Re: Tea Pot Carburetor

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Thanks for your help and info, especially on the RPM ranges of the governor.

What I ended up doing is rebuilding the '55. Talk about a marked improvement over the 2 X 2 set up that I took off!!! Runs great and took care of all of my problems. I am running a ProComp Dist, Coil, and exciter box with no vacuum advance, so no problem with the Load-O-Matic issue; just blocked it off.

I know there would be an improvement in fuel economy with the vacuum advance, but I guess one can't have it all. I get much better mileage than with the 2 X 2 set up as well; probably going to well excede 20 MPG. I did install an Automatic overdrive form an '87 Ford pick-up a couple of years back, so that helps a lot too.

VR, Motorhead
Motorhead6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 PM.