Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2013, 01:28 PM   #21
Frank Miller
Senior Member
 
Frank Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auburn, MA
Posts: 2,106
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

Johnsons been leaving spots for years.
__________________
“The technique of infamy is to start two lies at once and get people arguing heatedly over which is true.” ~ Ezra Pound
Frank Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 01:28 PM   #22
19Fordy
Senior Member
 
19Fordy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,921
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldford2 View Post
Just curious,
What did the original Johnson holding tool (singular) look like?
John


Last edited by 19Fordy; 08-14-2013 at 01:35 PM.
19Fordy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 08-14-2013, 01:33 PM   #23
Frank Miller
Senior Member
 
Frank Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auburn, MA
Posts: 2,106
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

And then there was the little know knock off, Big Johnson lifters.
Their motto was, "When your clearances need to be tight, there's nothing like a Big Johnson."
Ok I'll go now.
__________________
“The technique of infamy is to start two lies at once and get people arguing heatedly over which is true.” ~ Ezra Pound
Frank Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 03:30 PM   #24
oldford2
Senior Member
 
oldford2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: pittsfield, MA
Posts: 2,086
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bputhuff View Post
Johnson lifters are much heavier than stock (unadjustable) FOMOCO lifters. Lighter is better. There is a significant difference in weight among the various Johnson-style lifters on the market. Shop around. One way to spend a quiet evening with a postal scale is to weigh each lifter and file the ones that are heavy. It might not make any difference in the 0-60 time, but it seems like the right thing to do.
That would be a lot of filing.
John

oldford2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 04:16 PM   #25
jimTN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Powell, TN
Posts: 2,508
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

Answer to the original question is no. You cannot use the type of Johnson lifter shown with a reground cam. It will be too short and because the screw has to be let out so far to adjust, it will not hold its adjustment. The correct Johnson lifters have a higher screw head (nut) and were made for reground cams. That version is no longer in production. You can tell the difference easily, the part where a wrench goes to adjust is much thicker.
jimTN is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 05:21 PM   #26
Walt Dupont--Me.
Senior Member
 
Walt Dupont--Me.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Gardiner Me.
Posts: 4,200
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimTN View Post
Answer to the original question is no. You cannot use the type of Johnson lifter shown with a reground cam. It will be too short and because the screw has to be let out so far to adjust, it will not hold its adjustment. The correct Johnson lifters have a higher screw head (nut) and were made for reground cams. That version is no longer in production. You can tell the difference easily, the part where a wrench goes to adjust is much thicker.
I used to run a Napa machine shop the last 10 yr's of my work career. I've been (retarded) for 15yr's but we used the have those lifter with the thicker heads in the Napa parts book. Walt
Walt Dupont--Me. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 08:10 PM   #27
19Fordy
Senior Member
 
19Fordy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,921
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimTN View Post
Answer to the original question is no. You cannot use the type of Johnson lifter shown with a reground cam. It will be too short and because the screw has to be let out so far to adjust, it will not hold its adjustment. The correct Johnson lifters have a higher screw head (nut) and were made for reground cams. That version is no longer in production. You can tell the difference easily, the part where a wrench goes to adjust is much thicker.
Jim, if possible, please post a photo of the thicker Johnson lifter alongside the regular Johnson lifter.
19Fordy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 08:13 PM   #28
19Fordy
Senior Member
 
19Fordy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,921
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldford2 View Post
That would be a lot of filing.
John

Rather than file the top, could you just drill holes in the sides of the lifter to lighten it? I know it's hardened steel, but a carbide drill might work or perhaps water jet cutting.
19Fordy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 09:14 PM   #29
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,407
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 19Fordy View Post
Rather than file the top, could you just drill holes in the sides of the lifter to lighten it? I know it's hardened steel, but a carbide drill might work or perhaps water jet cutting.
We have been doing that since the early 50's.
It is a $300 job. The holes are not easy but the REALLY hard part is deburring the inside of the holes. It's a dental pick and scrape job. and that's 9 holes per lifter.
This is just one of the small details as to why my circle track engines will turn over 7000.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Drilled lifters1.jpg (34.2 KB, 69 views)
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013, 07:44 AM   #30
Robert Dip
Senior Member
 
Robert Dip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Candiac, Qc.
Posts: 483
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

jimTN...a great awakening here.....'cannot use original Johnson lifters with a re-ground cam'...interesting comment.....so does one use Chevy valves with an adjusted shaft length ?? I'll have to do more research here...any comments from the know-how guys?? Robert
Robert Dip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013, 08:53 AM   #31
Bluebell
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 726
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

Isn't there a longer type of adjustables, and isn't there also a longer stemmed Chev valve?

Is there a current manufactured johnson style lifter that is correctly hardened, that the screws don't come loose in? Names please.
Bluebell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013, 09:15 AM   #32
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,855
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

I personally don't think the weight of the lifter is a critical factor in engine performance. Yes lighter is better, however our street engines rarely 4K let alone 7. The answer is use a longer valve for the reground cams lilk the L-100, 400jr etc. The SBC is valve is .060" longer than the stock Ford valve. Now Walt Dupont has a fixture that welds material on the end of the valve and he uses stock ford lifters. these come id two different lengths. Don't expect to save any money here, this is a time consuming job. Just think of he engines application befor you builr it.
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013, 09:30 AM   #33
Bluebell
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 726
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

So Ron you are saying it is only the non adjustables that come in two lengths. Correct?
Bluebell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013, 12:32 PM   #34
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,526
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

There were some adjustables made with a thicker bolt head, hence a taller lifter.
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013, 02:13 PM   #35
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,855
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

NO, the Johnson had a thicker adjusting nut, the longer stock lifters makes it easier to grind valve stems for some cams. Walt can give you a better idea of the combinations of valves to lifters, because he does this on a regular basis. Not many guys left that can do this, it's becoming a lost art.
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013, 06:46 PM   #36
jimTN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Powell, TN
Posts: 2,508
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

Johnson thick head and std lifters
Attached Images
File Type: jpg jOHNSON LIFTER 009 std.jpg (41.7 KB, 49 views)
File Type: jpg jOHNSON LIFTER 008 thick head.jpg (24.4 KB, 47 views)
jimTN is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013, 06:48 PM   #37
jimTN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Powell, TN
Posts: 2,508
Default Re: Johnson lifters or not ?

first pic is std lifter second is thick head in an old dirt track 60 over with 404 cam. Sorry about pic quality, could not get the flash to work.
jimTN is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.