|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-14-2013, 01:28 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auburn, MA
Posts: 2,106
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
Johnsons been leaving spots for years.
__________________
“The technique of infamy is to start two lies at once and get people arguing heatedly over which is true.” ~ Ezra Pound |
08-14-2013, 01:28 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,921
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
Quote:
Last edited by 19Fordy; 08-14-2013 at 01:35 PM. |
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
08-14-2013, 01:33 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auburn, MA
Posts: 2,106
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
And then there was the little know knock off, Big Johnson lifters.
Their motto was, "When your clearances need to be tight, there's nothing like a Big Johnson." Ok I'll go now.
__________________
“The technique of infamy is to start two lies at once and get people arguing heatedly over which is true.” ~ Ezra Pound |
08-14-2013, 03:30 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: pittsfield, MA
Posts: 2,086
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
Quote:
John |
|
08-14-2013, 04:16 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Powell, TN
Posts: 2,508
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
Answer to the original question is no. You cannot use the type of Johnson lifter shown with a reground cam. It will be too short and because the screw has to be let out so far to adjust, it will not hold its adjustment. The correct Johnson lifters have a higher screw head (nut) and were made for reground cams. That version is no longer in production. You can tell the difference easily, the part where a wrench goes to adjust is much thicker.
|
08-14-2013, 05:21 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Gardiner Me.
Posts: 4,200
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
|
|
08-14-2013, 08:10 PM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,921
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
Quote:
|
|
08-14-2013, 08:13 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,921
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
|
08-14-2013, 09:14 PM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,407
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
Quote:
It is a $300 job. The holes are not easy but the REALLY hard part is deburring the inside of the holes. It's a dental pick and scrape job. and that's 9 holes per lifter. This is just one of the small details as to why my circle track engines will turn over 7000. |
|
08-16-2013, 07:44 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Candiac, Qc.
Posts: 483
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
jimTN...a great awakening here.....'cannot use original Johnson lifters with a re-ground cam'...interesting comment.....so does one use Chevy valves with an adjusted shaft length ?? I'll have to do more research here...any comments from the know-how guys?? Robert
|
08-16-2013, 08:53 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 726
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
Isn't there a longer type of adjustables, and isn't there also a longer stemmed Chev valve?
Is there a current manufactured johnson style lifter that is correctly hardened, that the screws don't come loose in? Names please. |
08-16-2013, 09:15 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,855
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
I personally don't think the weight of the lifter is a critical factor in engine performance. Yes lighter is better, however our street engines rarely 4K let alone 7. The answer is use a longer valve for the reground cams lilk the L-100, 400jr etc. The SBC is valve is .060" longer than the stock Ford valve. Now Walt Dupont has a fixture that welds material on the end of the valve and he uses stock ford lifters. these come id two different lengths. Don't expect to save any money here, this is a time consuming job. Just think of he engines application befor you builr it.
|
08-16-2013, 09:30 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 726
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
So Ron you are saying it is only the non adjustables that come in two lengths. Correct?
|
08-16-2013, 12:32 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,526
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
There were some adjustables made with a thicker bolt head, hence a taller lifter.
|
08-16-2013, 02:13 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,855
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
NO, the Johnson had a thicker adjusting nut, the longer stock lifters makes it easier to grind valve stems for some cams. Walt can give you a better idea of the combinations of valves to lifters, because he does this on a regular basis. Not many guys left that can do this, it's becoming a lost art.
|
08-16-2013, 06:46 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Powell, TN
Posts: 2,508
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
Johnson thick head and std lifters
|
08-16-2013, 06:48 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Powell, TN
Posts: 2,508
|
Re: Johnson lifters or not ?
first pic is std lifter second is thick head in an old dirt track 60 over with 404 cam. Sorry about pic quality, could not get the flash to work.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|