Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2020, 07:56 AM   #1
Bob Bidonde
Senior Member
 
Bob Bidonde's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,432
Default Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

I need your help again. It seems I have a lot of questions these days. Actually, I am working on presentations for my local club, so questions arise I never thought of before.
At this time I am building a presentation about engine vibrations which leads to this question. What is the weight of one crankshaft counterbalance weight before it goes onto a crankshaft?
__________________
Bob Bidonde
Bob Bidonde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2020, 11:08 AM   #2
Kurt in NJ
Senior Member
 
Kurt in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,140
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

which style of counterweight ---i have some of the ford design shrink on ones i could weigh
Kurt in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 08-23-2020, 11:10 AM   #3
Bob Bidonde
Senior Member
 
Bob Bidonde's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,432
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Thanks Kurt. Please weigh one for me.
__________________
Bob Bidonde
Bob Bidonde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2020, 11:49 AM   #4
Jim Brierley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,066
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Early '28, so-called 'beaver-tail' cranks weigh 27 lbs.
Later A's weigh 29 lbs.
B cranks, 39 lbs.
C cranks, 46 lbs.
BB cranks, 58 lbs. (pressed-on, 1" wide weights. So called because these were added by authorized Ford rebuilders when a 'B' engine was rebuilt, mostly on 'B' trucks.
I may have some weights I planned on putting on a 'B' crank, I'll look for them.

A & B engines have naturally occuring vibration points, at about 800-900, 1600, and 2300 (this from my menory) They are heard more than felt, in most engines they aren't noticeable, and usually when being driven, not sitting in your driveway.

Last edited by Jim Brierley; 08-23-2020 at 11:54 AM. Reason: Added info
Jim Brierley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2020, 01:26 PM   #5
johnneilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: 34.22 N 118.36 W
Posts: 1,043
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Interesting inquiry, I found old picture of B-B counterweight drawing some years ago.
I then modeled up in solidworks, from a pretty bad sketch.

I come up with mass of #4.87 per counterweight.

As an interesting side note, the Miller racing engines found that you could not get enough counter weight to balance out the harmonics. If you look at pics of them, the counterweight is full radius and 180 degrees opposite the rod journal.

John
__________________
As Carroll Smith wrote; All Failures are Human in Origin.
johnneilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2020, 04:31 PM   #6
kenparker
Senior Member
 
kenparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Van, Texas
Posts: 1,122
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
I have s set of counterweights from Berts. Bolt on then weld the ends. Set of 4. Each one weighs 3.1 lbs total weight of 12.4 lbs. They are the samee thickness as the counters on the crankshft - 5/8" thick.



also. crankshft turned 10/10 under weighs in at 24.8 with no counterweights. Second crankshaft also turned 10/10 under with the above weights added weighs in at 37 lbs.
kenparker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2020, 04:42 PM   #7
GerryAllen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Birch Bay WA
Posts: 190
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

What exactly are the counterbalance weights for. What effect would it have on my engine if it was not counter balanced.
Gerry Birch Bay WA.
GerryAllen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2020, 05:23 PM   #8
daren007
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Saint Cloud Mn
Posts: 745
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Is it possible to “turn” a crankshaft as opposed to grinding.
daren007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2020, 06:00 PM   #9
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,373
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by daren007 View Post
Is it possible to “turn” a crankshaft as opposed to grinding.
Yes. It is possible to "turn" a crank in a lathe by offset mounting it on 2 face plates. We made a single plane crank for a cut in half Chev V8 this way once.
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2020, 08:13 PM   #10
Synchro909
Senior Member
 
Synchro909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,471
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

From what I have heard, what ever you do to put counterweights on an A crank, you won't have the optimum. Right now, I don't remember the name of the guy who attaches shrink on weights to the crank, then puts more weight on the side of those. I think that setup would be heavier than the others and closer to ideal.
Clearly, shrink on weights will weigh more than the weld on ones because they go all the way around the crank flange without adding any more counterweight effect. I don't think we have enough information to properly answer this question.
__________________
I'm part of the only ever generation with an analogue childhood and a digital adulthood.
Synchro909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2020, 09:10 PM   #11
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,373
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by Synchro909 View Post
From what I have heard, what ever you do to put counterweights on an A crank, you won't have the optimum. Right now, I don't remember the name of the guy who attaches shrink on weights to the crank, then puts more weight on the side of those. I think that setup would be heavier than the others and closer to ideal.
Clearly, shrink on weights will weigh more than the weld on ones because they go all the way around the crank flange without adding any more counterweight effect. I don't think we have enough information to properly answer this question.
Using steel weights, about the maximum you can cram into the space available is 65%. By lightening the reciprocating assembly to a minimum safe value and using tungsten or depleted uranium for weights you could probably get very close to optimum. HOWEVER, I can tell you from first hand experience, an engine built this way is a horrible slug on a circle track.
It would do well in parades.
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2020, 10:29 PM   #12
Synchro909
Senior Member
 
Synchro909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,471
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete View Post
Using steel weights, about the maximum you can cram into the space available is 65%. By lightening the reciprocating assembly to a minimum safe value and using tungsten or depleted uranium for weights you could probably get very close to optimum. HOWEVER, I can tell you from first hand experience, an engine built this way is a horrible slug on a circle track.
It would do well in parades.
Who wouldn't lighten the flywheel to compensate for the extra weight on the crank?
__________________
I'm part of the only ever generation with an analogue childhood and a digital adulthood.
Synchro909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2020, 10:49 PM   #13
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,373
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by Synchro909 View Post
Who wouldn't lighten the flywheel to compensate for the extra weight on the crank?
Assuming you have used enough depleted uranium to balance the CRANK ASSEMBLY completely, the flywheel/clutch and damper weight has nothing to do with crank balance.

A heavy total weight, crank assembly limits the performance of any car not only by total weight added to the car but MOSTLY because of poor spool up.
This is usualy of little concern in a vintage street machine though.
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2020, 08:46 AM   #14
Bob Bidonde
Senior Member
 
Bob Bidonde's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,432
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Thanks Ken Parker. This is exactly what I asked for:
I have s set of counterweights from Berts. Bolt on then weld the ends. Set of 4. Each one weighs 3.1 lbs total weight of 12.4 lbs. They are the samee thickness as the counters on the crankshft - 5/8" thick.

Also crankshft turned 10/10 under weighs in at 24.8 with no counterweights. Second crankshaft also turned 10/10 under with the above weights added weighs in at 37 lbs.
__________________
Bob Bidonde
Bob Bidonde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2020, 10:32 AM   #15
katy
Senior Member
 
katy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 5,008
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Quote:
We made a single plane crank for a cut in half Chev V8 this way once.
Which way was it cut? Crossways? Or longitudinally?
__________________
If you don't hear a rumor by 10 AM, start one!.
Got my education out behind the barn!
katy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2020, 10:41 AM   #16
Jim Brierley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,066
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Gerry Allen, counterweights increase the life of the crank & bearings. You will feel little or no increase in smoothness while driving.
Jim Brierley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2020, 12:44 PM   #17
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,373
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by katy View Post
Which way was it cut? Crossways? Or longitudinally?
Lengthwise. Inline 4.
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2020, 10:50 PM   #18
daren007
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Saint Cloud Mn
Posts: 745
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

What kind of lathe would you need to “Turn” crankshaft journals. How accurate finish can be obtained. Does anyone have more info and pictures?
daren007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2020, 12:55 PM   #19
BRENT in 10-uh-C
Senior Member
 
BRENT in 10-uh-C's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Posts: 11,485
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by daren007 View Post
What kind of lathe would you need to “Turn” crankshaft journals. How accurate finish can be obtained. Does anyone have more info and pictures?
This is kind of a loaded question IMO. A crankshaft could be "roughed-in" using a lathe however the only advantage is how quickly it can be done. The advantage to using a crankshaft grinder is, I can hold a tolerance to less than a couple of tenths however this comes at a price of much slower removal of journal material.

I have a Storm Vulcan 15 crankshaft grinder, -and my biggest lathe is a Howa 16" x 59". Both machines weigh around 4,500 pounds, yet the crank grinder is a much more rigid machine comparing the two. When trying to achieve a quality finish, rigidity is a must. So my point is you would need a very robust lathe to achieve a finish you could be happy with. Using a tool-post grinder on that lathe would be a plus.
__________________
.

BRENT in 10-uh-C
.
www.model-a-ford.com
...(...Finally Updated!! )

.
BRENT in 10-uh-C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2020, 02:04 AM   #20
SAJ
Senior Member
 
SAJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 513
Default Re: Crankshaft Counterbalance Weight

Would this one be rigid enough? It is a 42 inch throw facing and boring lathe weighing 10.5 tons without the face plate shown. There is no tail stock on this type but another face plate or a precision steady can be mounted on the rear.
My son and I are just fettling and setting it up in our collection.
I am just joking because I have no intention of machining a crankshaft in it.
I have trued up several Model A rear flanges in another of our lathes, after straightening the cranks in a press.
A crank grinder is something missing in our collection of machine tools.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20200523_155218_copy_1280x960.jpg (93.7 KB, 81 views)
File Type: jpg 20200317_104900_copy_1280x960.jpg (74.2 KB, 68 views)
SAJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 AM.