Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2012, 12:56 PM   #21
Bruce Lancaster
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

Ford did add in another grade when Lincoln went to a hypoid axle. I happen to have a '46 service manual here: Regular Ford, "Mild EP gear oil to level of plug", 90 winter, 140 summer
Lincoln, hypoid gear oil, 90 EP, 80 when below 10 degrees.
Bruce Lancaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2012, 11:51 PM   #22
Old Henry
Senior Member
 
Old Henry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 5,762
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

Here's the lubrications chart for my '47 that says use 2 1/2 pints of S.A.E. 90 in the winter and S.A.E. 140 in the summer. That's what I do.

__________________
Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome)
"It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” *Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness
Old Henry is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 08-23-2012, 08:35 AM   #23
Bruce Lancaster
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

A note on all this...READ the blasted owner's manual before messing with stuff! Lots of information on this and other things, and if you don't have one repros are cheap.
By the way, using 600 is a widespread mistake, and can you show me ANY Ford manual calling for 600 even on A's? They call just for something like "good quality gear oil", and the EP stuff had not appeared yet...
Bruce Lancaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 09:08 AM   #24
phartman
Senior Member
 
phartman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 339
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Lancaster View Post
A note on all this...READ the blasted owner's manual before messing with stuff! Lots of information on this and other things, and if you don't have one repros are cheap.
By the way, using 600 is a widespread mistake, and can you show me ANY Ford manual calling for 600 even on A's? They call just for something like "good quality gear oil", and the EP stuff had not appeared yet...
My use of the 600 stuff, in retrospect, is a little puzzling. I used it because that's what an "expert" told me he used. But when I now go to research what it is, and what properties the 600 has, I am coming up short. Funny how this folklore about early Fords gets started.


Yup, go back and read the manuals. Excellent advice, duly noted.
phartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 05:30 PM   #25
Straightpipes
Senior Member
 
Straightpipes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ballston Spa, NY
Posts: 789
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

Well, Bruce, Looking thru books. I'm back to Fordson tractor manual 1923 calling for 600W in the rear/tranny.
Amusing that so many Ford guys rush to use MACs oil. Nothing wriong with it, mind you, as I myself used it for years. Only last year did I realize the I didn't need it. Thanks to the guys on the HAMB.
Come on over and visit at Hershey this year..
Straightpipes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:11 AM   #26
31chevy
Senior Member
 
31chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lake City Mi.
Posts: 807
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
I guess I opened a can of worms about the 600# Here is what it says in the 1931 publication of my chevy book.(A grease of the consistency of 600W should be used or a transmission oil which is sold by oil companies for that purpose.) & (The rear axle should be filled with oil the same consistency as used in the transmission). I will probably be using a more modern lubricant when it becomes time to change fluids. Please note that it says or.
Gary.
31chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 09:48 AM   #27
Bruce Lancaster
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

The change to EP and then on to the modern viscosities of that came along as Detroit switched to spiral gears from the spur gears of the Model T period...Ford went to spiral cut rear in '28, trans gears in '32, but I think '32 was the first Ford manual calling for EP.
Probably it took a lot of worn gears before the industry developed the special stuff... I wonder if all those TT worm gear rears would have held up better.
The EP qualities had to be jacked up again for hypoid rears as they had even more sliding contact than on-center spirals. At Ford, that meant Lincoln first.
Bruce Lancaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2012, 05:49 AM   #28
phartman
Senior Member
 
phartman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 339
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

Come to find out that when my tranny was rebuilt, the mechanic used 600wt in that too.

Any idea what the lube capacity is of a 3 speed 1948 toploader?

I'll be under the front of the truck changing that sometime this weekend. How many quarts do I need to get at the autoparts store??? I'm coming up with 2.75 quarts. Correct???

Last edited by phartman; 08-25-2012 at 06:07 AM.
phartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2012, 06:49 AM   #29
Bassman/NZ
Senior Member
 
Bassman/NZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Napier, New Zealand
Posts: 2,001
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

600 is NOT 600wt. It's probably around 220wt or so. The 600 is not a weight designation, in fact no-one seems to know where the 600 designation came from. I've been told it was steam-cylinder oil, but I have no idea if that's correct.
Bassman/NZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 06:32 PM   #30
phartman
Senior Member
 
phartman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 339
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

Changed the trans and differential fluids to 85/140 wt. Got everything buttoned up. No leaks. Truck runs noticably quieter, much less gear noise, much easier to shift.

Thanks, fellas. You did good. Much appreciated.
phartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 06:59 PM   #31
Step-down
Senior Member
 
Step-down's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Hat City (Danbury CT)
Posts: 647
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

columbia rear axles are very spec. the weight to use...correct .... With a Columbia two speed added you use the plug on the Columbia correct different high .....
Step-down is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 06:37 PM   #32
mick in saratoga
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Clifton Park (Saratoga Co.) NY
Posts: 3
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

I was about to fill the transmission of my '40 with Valvoline 85-140W gear oil when I read the label, so I called the Valvoline Tech hotline. That product is not recommended for the transmission because of the damage it will do to brass/copper.
mick in saratoga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 07:28 PM   #33
Krylon32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,482
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

In the banjos or quick changes in our shop we use Winters Moly 80-90-140. Seems to work good with no problems.
Krylon32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2014, 02:38 AM   #34
Drbrown
Senior Member
 
Drbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Glens Falls NY
Posts: 1,267
Default Re: Banjo rear lube level

I use GL4 85W-140W from Napa in all except I use straight 140W in my BW OD (as recommended by former BW mechanic). And yes, beware over-filling the diff.
Drbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 PM.