|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-05-2018, 08:54 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,835
|
Rear bumper confusion.
I am confused about the rear bumper used on a 1931 Ford deluxe roadster with sidemount spares. I see some pictures of ones that have the two separate short bumpers that seem to be for a rear spare mount but I also see some that have a full bumper like the front. Was a full bumper bar available or optional for a car with dual sidemounts or are these guys using front bumpers? Which is correct? Couple catalogs I have like Bratton's and Snyders only show the pair short bars for rear.Thank you in advance.
__________________
"Never complain,never explain"... Henry Ford II |
09-05-2018, 01:39 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: new britain,ct 06052
Posts: 9,390
|
Re: Rear bumper confusion.
My 31 with dual sidemounts has full size rear bumper. There was a thread a while ago discussing this same question. Try doing a search.
Paul in CT |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
09-05-2018, 02:15 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 9,115
|
Re: Rear bumper confusion.
My pickup has a full size rear bumper.
__________________
Alaskan A's Antique Auto Mushers of Alaska Model A Ford Club of America Model A Restorers Club Antique Automobile Club of America Mullins Owner's Club |
09-05-2018, 03:38 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,835
|
Re: Rear bumper confusion.
I did do a search and so far still confused.I understand that a lot of the Deluxe option in 1930 included the sidemounts and other options like the luggage rack but in 1931 due to the depression some things were not included in the Deluxe and had to be bought extra. Mine (31) has dual sidemounts and the split or two bumpers that you normally see on rear spare mounted cars. No big deal as this isn't the only thing wrong with this car, but doing research I have seen this same deal on 1930 and 1931 roadsters,both ways. I guess it is a front bumper if a long one is used on rear.
__________________
"Never complain,never explain"... Henry Ford II |
09-05-2018, 04:31 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Posts: 364
|
Re: Rear bumper confusion.
Interesting in that the JCS does not address this detail...except in five simple paragraphs in the beginning of Divisoin 15. None of them answer your question. My research on all the "Deluxe Models" including the 190A is that all the (truly) Deluxe models had the continuous bumpers on the rear and the front. As an aside, I also noticed on original cars that I have studied, the rear has a slight bit more curve that the fronts. Ok that being said, I am showing Marco Tatrus's Deluxe Roadster with the continuous bumper bars front and rear. SOOOOOO if you have the split bumpers on the rear, your "deluxe" title might have been because an ambitious restorer of the 50's through the 80's was trying to "deluxify" his (now your) roadster by the simple addition of side mounts, lower windshield, and leather trim. It has been known to happen, in fact one Master Judge was overheard commenting once that there are probably more Deluxe Roadsters today than there were produced. So the deluxe cars with continuous rear bumpers were the Deluxe Phaeton, Deluxe Roadster, A190 Victoria, A400 Covertible Sedan, Cabriolet and Deluxe Coupes. There was also a Deluxe Tudor offered about June of 1931 but talk to Rick Black about those. It also seems that the continuous rear bumpers could be ordered...The JCS does say that the Deluxe Trunk Rack was offered in June of 1930 but my evidence suggest that it was October of 1930...which is also the time the Deluxe Roadster was announced.
|
09-05-2018, 04:37 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,835
|
Re: Rear bumper confusion.
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
__________________
"Never complain,never explain"... Henry Ford II |
|
09-05-2018, 05:14 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Big Pine,CA
Posts: 161
|
Re: Rear bumper confusion.
Pickups did not come with a rear bumper
|
09-05-2018, 05:35 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 241
|
Re: Rear bumper confusion.
I think the deluxe Phaeton's came with the one bumper but if it's your car, you can do what you want.
|
09-05-2018, 06:14 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,962
|
Re: Rear bumper confusion.
Dealers added full bumpers, I have read that in the past but cannot cite the source.
|
09-05-2018, 06:23 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,413
|
Re: Rear bumper confusion.
Your car do what you want.
Want to do it right? Buy the restoration guidelines for answers.
__________________
No one wants advice - only corroboration. -John Steinbeck |
09-05-2018, 07:07 PM | #11 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Kritter Krick, Flaw-duh
Posts: 1,158
|
Re: Rear bumper confusion.
Quote:
Quote:
From Marco Tahtaras' website - http://www.abarnyard.com/roadster/product2.htm Quote:
|
|||
09-05-2018, 07:27 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Kritter Krick, Flaw-duh
Posts: 1,158
|
Re: Rear bumper confusion.
Quote:
Victoria, Cabriolet, Deluxe Coupe and Deluxe Tudor had rear-mounted spare and therefore split bumper as standard equipment. |
|
09-06-2018, 07:05 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,835
|
Re: Rear bumper confusion.
Interesting ,but did they have an actual full length rear bumper or was it the same as the front and ended up curved more after mounting? A nice looking blue '31 roadster is on Ebay now and he just lowered the price into the thirties,it was in the forties .same bumper as mine .I guess some guys miss the mark even on expensive restorations. I probably will not change mine as its been on there for 60 years at least and probably since new if roadster was changed from a standard to a deluxe as mentioned earlier post. See one thing interesting body has never been off the frame which was probably the norm with a fairly good car at the time 25-35 years old,just a paint job and upholstery.
__________________
"Never complain,never explain"... Henry Ford II |
09-06-2018, 09:14 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,463
|
Re: Rear bumper confusion.
Standard equipment is the double set of bumper bars. The front type bumper on the rear of passenger cars was an option.
Pickup trucks did not have rear bumpers.
__________________
Bob Bidonde |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|