Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-23-2021, 01:49 PM   #21
alexiskai
Senior Member
 
alexiskai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Mebane NC
Posts: 2,354
Default Re: Bad manifold gaskets

These seem to be just a sort of a flare around the edge of the gasket? Really hard to tell from the photo. The early '28 models came with six individual copper gaskets that did have true rings built into them, but no one makes those.
alexiskai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2021, 01:52 PM   #22
alexiskai
Senior Member
 
alexiskai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Mebane NC
Posts: 2,354
Default Re: Bad manifold gaskets

FWIW, I'm planning to outfit the phaeton with Remflex gaskets following the engine overhaul. These don't look stock at all, but they're very good at sealing leaks.
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/rfl-3040
alexiskai is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-23-2021, 11:21 PM   #23
wwirz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Corning NY
Posts: 244
Default Re: Bad manifold gaskets

Quote:
Originally Posted by Y-Blockhead View Post
Has anyone tried the copper gaskets with the glands built in?MAC's seems to be the only vendor that carries them. https://www.macsautoparts.com/model-...8-24826-1.html
These did not work for me. I could not even get these gaskets over the studs on the engine block.
I used the gland rings and the copper gaskets. I also put a light smear of hi temp exhaust sealant on the faces of the gasket.
Once the engine started and ran for a while, I also checked the torque and re-torqued if necessary.
wwirz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2022, 11:57 PM   #24
dmaxweb
Senior Member
 
dmaxweb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 510
Default Re: Bad manifold gaskets

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexiskai View Post
I'm confused. The manifold is cast iron, so the linear thermal expansion coefficient is 5.8. The rings are mild steel, so the coefficient is ~6.5-7.0. That's close enough that the expansion you'd get at normal exhaust temperatures is like going from a slip fit to an interference fit. Unless you're needing to drive your homemade rings in with a hammer, it doesn't seem like you'd need to worry about buckling due to expansion.
What about rings cut from 316SS tube (1.500" OD X 16GA (0.065"))? With a significantly higher coefficient than cast iron can they still be solid or is a gap needed for thermal expansion?
dmaxweb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2022, 06:14 AM   #25
dmaxweb
Senior Member
 
dmaxweb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 510
Default Re: Bad manifold gaskets

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmaxweb View Post
What about rings cut from 316SS tube (1.500" OD X 16GA (0.065"))? With a significantly higher coefficient than cast iron can they still be solid or is a gap needed for thermal expansion?
Would it be better to use solid rings made from mild steel or cutting 304 stainless steel rings with a hacksaw to allow some thermal expansion?
dmaxweb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2022, 09:12 PM   #26
Nailhead Jeff
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 10
Default Re: Bad manifold gaskets

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Get Best gaskets from Egge Machine, they are great.
Nailhead Jeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 AM.