The Ford Barn - View Single Post

sjaakslinger · 12-11-2023, 04:20 AM

I got .010 undersize rod bearings for the 36 LB engine we're rebuilding/having rebuild. Part 48-6211-C. (.010 under, STD on the rod)

The rebuilder says they don't fit the rods. Neither of them. Seems odd to me. Parts are NOS. I suppose 1 set could be mixed up at some point the last 70 yrs, but all 4...

In the Flathead Rebuild book I read it's common to tap them into shape. When I mentionned this to my rebuilder, his eyes almost popped out. [emoji28] They've done 1 or 2 newer Flatheads before, but they rebuild for a wide variety of cars, mainly top notch stuff (Ferrari, Maserati, etc.)

Is it really common practice to tap those bearings into shape? Do they really get a bit misformed from laying on a shell all those years?

Thanks.

Dennis

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk

12-11-2023, 04:20 AM	#1
sjaakslinger Member Join Date: Oct 2022 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 92	Tap rod bearings into shape?? I got .010 undersize rod bearings for the 36 LB engine we're rebuilding/having rebuild. Part 48-6211-C. (.010 under, STD on the rod) The rebuilder says they don't fit the rods. Neither of them. Seems odd to me. Parts are NOS. I suppose 1 set could be mixed up at some point the last 70 yrs, but all 4... In the Flathead Rebuild book I read it's common to tap them into shape. When I mentionned this to my rebuilder, his eyes almost popped out. [emoji28] They've done 1 or 2 newer Flatheads before, but they rebuild for a wide variety of cars, mainly top notch stuff (Ferrari, Maserati, etc.) Is it really common practice to tap those bearings into shape? Do they really get a bit misformed from laying on a shell all those years? Thanks. Dennis Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk