[Kevin in NJ]

Which group did it posted on?

Here is where science has a set of rules that tend to not be understood by the public. His statements are nice, but useless without full details.
We need to have enough information to be able to repeat the tests. What machines did he use, how did he do the test set up and such.
MikeK nailed the rest of the problems with his statement.

So while it sounds great that he ran a test, it is still useless information as it is presented. It is only as good as opinion.

Keep in mind I am NOT saying what he did is wrong. I am saying that as a scientist I do not have enough information to believe what he has stated as being fact and meaningful.