![]() |
what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? what is it that people find inadequate with original fuel pumps on 32-48 fords that they feel it needs augmenting or replacing, assuming the engine hasn't been modified for performance reasons?
|
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? Quote:
|
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? Quote:
and BTW, did i detect a touch of sarcasm in the part that reads, "...supposedly it was my fault..." or am i projecting? ha |
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? ...
|
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? There's absolutely nothing wrong with stock fuel pumps if you start the car every once in a while, to keep the carbs from drying out. That wasn't a problem when they were your daily drivers. On my collector cars that sit for months, maybe even years it is a problem. So, now I like to use an auxiliary electric fuel pump to just prime the systems to get them started and then I run them off of the original fuel pump once it does start, if they do start. It just a convenience thing, I don't like to crank and crank the engines to finally get the fuel to the carbs. I have so many collector cars that I tend to let them sit, then when I do try to start them it's a hassle to get the fuel up to the carbs. My fault for letting them sit so long. I was a professional phone company mechanic for 30-years so that last thing I wanted to do was work on cars all night and then work on them at home during the day. At that time it was just fun to buy this stuff for my retirement years. Most of these cars I have bought over the last 40-years to work on when I retired but then I had a stroke two years ago, not too bad of a stroke but it's slowed me up quite a bit.
I'm working on getting my Shelby '66 GT-350 started after letting it sit for 10-years. I pushed it out of the garage this weekend and I drained the old fuel out of it. The carb's needle and seat is stuck closed from sitting for so long or the fuel pump isn't pumping. That's today's project. There are some neat cars out there, the Shelby, '32 roadsters, '32 coupes, Model A Roadster, even a couple pre-1920 era Mack trucks, enough to keep me busy until I croak. |
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? Quote:
|
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? First post here. I’ve just started restoring a ’34 Fordor and like the idea of using an auxiliary electric pumps to prime the system.
I’m curious what type of electric pump people recommend and how it’s typically installed with the original mechanical pump. Any tips or setups that work well would be greatly appreciated. |
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? Letting a car sit is much harder on it than occasional driving.
I don't run electric pumps on any of my cars. I expect to crank on the starter for a while if I let a car sit for too long. I don't see this as a problem, I like to see the oil pressure come up from zero before the engine fires up after letting a car sit for a while. You need a good battery to make this a common practice. I don't let a car sit for more than four or five months. That is asking for big problems from today's gasoline. I run at least one tank of fuel through a car every six months. |
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? If you know the car is going to sit for a long time, I would suggest tracking down non-ethanol fuel and fill the tank with that. If not, use a product like Star Brite or others that combat long term storage ethanol issues.
|
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? I use marine gas in both of mine, non-ethanol, but close to four bucks a gallon on coastal Georgia. Marine gas is readily available here.
|
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? Quote:
Many of my cars sit for a month or more during starts. I have never had to prime any of them. In fact, a pump or two at the pedal, pull the choke, hit the button and no more than five seconds, each and every starts right up. |
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? Quote:
|
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? How does aviation gas compare to marine gas for long term storage?
|
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? In my opinion, it was the rebuilders fault that your pump failed. Even 15 years ago 10 % ethanol gas was being used throughout the country and should have been rebuilt with ethanol proof parts. Failure to do so was a gross error on his part. I hope he made you good.
Quote:
|
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? Quote:
|
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? Quote:
Geeez, Kube...You just can't let it go, can you...The poor guy is dead!... |
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? Quote:
|
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? Quote:
|
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? I use kits from Then and Now Automotive for my fuel pumps, and have had good results.
Link to their kit selection: https://www.then-now-auto.com/produc...uel-pump-kits/ |
Re: what's wrong with a standard fuel pump? X2 on the NAPA pumps…..I purchased one from a big catalog source who I believe has stopped selling parts for our cars….it lasted a year…..I got one from my local NAPA and it’s been working great for about 15 years……on my stationary engine, I purchased kits for the fuel pump and carb from Michael at Thirdgen and they’ve been working great for a year or so……….Mark
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.