![]() |
Need some '35 floorboard seal insight 1 Attachment(s)
When I bought my coupe it came with a set on new floorboards, plus a box of Drake's floorboard seals. The wooden floorboards fit nicely -- but the fit of the seals is pretty sloppy. They're also quite thick.
Anyone have any experience with these seals? I'm thinking I could cut them up to fit them better, then glue them to the floorboard before bolting them into place. Has anyone else wrestled with these? |
Re: Need some '35 floorboard seal insight Yep, I think you got this.
|
Re: Need some '35 floorboard seal insight |
Re: Need some '35 floorboard seal insight 2 Attachment(s)
Detonator, There is a fair amount of evidence that Ford used an anti-squeak material as a seal for 35 and some 36 passenger car floor boards. This anti squeak was stapled on to the wooden floor board as the images attached show.
|
Re: Need some '35 floorboard seal insight Quote:
|
Re: Need some '35 floorboard seal insight My understanding, from a parts purveyor perspective is that the first 1935 used a stapled on fabric seal and the last 1936 used a sponge seal. The last 1936 floorboard was slightly undersized to accommodate the thickness of the sponge seal. When the change(s) occurred or if they were a running change ("use existing stock" directive) I do not know.
Checking my 1935 Ford parts book shows a 48-700364-B floorboard dust seal, my 1936 Ford parts book shows a 68-700364 (RH) and 68-700365 (LH). As the floorboards are asymmetric that would imply the 48- is a "universal strip" and the 68- are form fit. Note that the 48-700364-B implies there was a 48-700364 or 48-700364-A, so who knows what all changes were made (Until Don mines that information from the archives). My conclusion... you have a 1935 floorboard and a 1936 seal, and the two do not play well together. |
Re: Need some '35 floorboard seal insight https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/attac...p;d=1629897476
https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/attac...p;d=1629897476 Photos supplied by Don Rogers. |
Re: Need some '35 floorboard seal insight I have nothing to add to this thread except that I am constantly amazed at the tremendous amount of knowledge on this forum. In addition to the known experts, many others are also very knowledgeable.
Congratulations to all of you! |
Re: Need some '35 floorboard seal insight Quote:
One of my '35's has a sheet metal toe board on the left, driver's side, and I don't believe there is, or ever was, any anti-squeak material around this board. |
Re: Need some '35 floorboard seal insight 1 Attachment(s)
John, I believe that the steel floor board also used anti-squeak material. They used rivets instead of staples to hold on the material. Those rivets are still evident in the enclosed backside view of the steel board.
|
Re: Need some '35 floorboard seal insight Don,
The steel toe board in my early '35 phaeton, of which I am the second owner, had much of the riveted-on webbing intact. |
Re: Need some '35 floorboard seal insight "John, I believe that the steel floor board also used anti-squeak material. They used rivets instead of staples to hold on the material. Those rivets are still evident in the enclosed backside view of the steel board."- Don Rogers
Quote:
|
Re: Need some '35 floorboard seal insight Update: I was able to make the BD rubber seals work -- after cutting them up, punching holes where they were missing, etc etc. Thanks to Don's original diagram I edge-stapled the seals instead of face-stapling them, which gave me a good flush edge all the way around the top of the floorboard. Thanks everyone for your insight! Now...on to the transmission cover.
|
Re: Need some '35 floorboard seal insight Quote:
Don, thanks for the clarification on this. I'll check that sheet metal toe board to see if I can find any remnants of the anti-squeak material, possibly still attached at those rivets. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.