The Ford Barn

The Ford Barn (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/index.php)
-   Model A (1928-31) (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Larger intake valves (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=275706)

GordonP 01-21-2020 02:54 AM

Larger intake valves
 

The Model A engine I’m working on rebuilding has larger intake valves and stock exhaust valves. All are inserted.

What’s the point?

I’m a big believer in stock engines. That said, is their some advantage to this configuration?

Truckerjim 01-21-2020 05:29 AM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

Makes the engine breather better for more power and maybe even more horsepower

updraught 01-21-2020 06:15 AM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

It's to keep up with the Japanese who refused to make under-stressed engines.

GordonP 01-21-2020 06:49 AM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Truckerjim (Post 1843783)
Makes the engine breather better for more power and maybe even more horsepower

Doesn't what comes in have to go out through the exhaust valve? Seems to me the only way to get more out the exhaust is to either make it bigger or increase the pressure, no?

Is anybody out there running an engine like this? My first inclination is to have the inserts redone back to stock.

kenparker 01-21-2020 08:26 AM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

nothing scientific, just, my opinion. The air coming in is pushed in - thru the intake valve - by atmosperic pressure and the vacumn caused by piston moving downard. The air moving out - the exhaust - is being pushed by the piston and the explosion and the expanding of the air inside the cylinder. The exploison and resulting expanding air move a lot faster than the air being sucked in by vacumn. clear as mud???


as said above the engine breathes better and is more efficient which equals more hp. I have built several engines with the larger valves and the one currently on the table will have the larger valves. Iffen I wus u I would leave the larger valves alone. Iffen you have insert main or rods I wud also leve dem alone. It would be VERY expensive to conver an engine back to babbit bearings. ken

40 Deluxe 01-21-2020 08:36 AM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

If the valves and seats are in good shape, just do the usual regrind. Being larger won't hurt a thing (and by itself probably not help much for power). It may have been done to repair worn out seats. But without a performance cam and bigger carb and intake (such as a B), not likely to make a difference.

updraught 01-21-2020 06:52 PM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

http://modelaparts.net/special.htm/1.700flowsheets.html

The exhaust valves are too big.

Pete 01-21-2020 08:19 PM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

On a FLATHEAD 4 or V8, people that believe the exhaust should NOT be as big or bigger than the intake are living in the past.
Ideally, the exhaust system should be big enough so that NO pressure wave is reflected past the reverse flow dam to the valve seat.

Synchro909 01-21-2020 09:57 PM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by updraught (Post 1844031)

I agree, in fact, when I was sold a set of valves with larger inlets, I put them in the lathe and turned them down. Instead of 0.2" larger, they ended up at 0.1 larger. I'm quite happy with the result but that said, I'm no less happy with an engine I did with standard sized valves. Everything else is the same.

holdover 01-21-2020 11:26 PM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

Exhaust valves (for reasons mentioned above) are usually smaller than intake valves. Increasing valve size does not always increase flow, depending on the engine/head design it sometimes reduces flow across the whole valve lift. An example is the 305 Chevy engine, increasing intake size alone often reduces flow, there is a delicate balance between value size, lift, porting, intake and headers etc.

40 Deluxe 01-22-2020 12:58 AM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by holdover (Post 1844117)
Exhaust valves (for reasons mentioned above) are usually smaller than intake valves. Increasing valve size does not always increase flow, depending on the engine/head design it sometimes reduces flow across the whole valve lift. An example is the 305 Chevy engine, increasing intake size alone often reduces flow, there is a delicate balance between value size, lift, porting, intake and headers etc.

Don't overlook the fact that the 305 has smaller cylinder bores, thus shrouding the intake valves.

edgar44 07-28-2025 10:16 PM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

I totally agree Gordon. Keep ‘em the same

edgar44 07-28-2025 10:18 PM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

Agreed

Marshall V. Daut 07-28-2025 11:21 PM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

1 Attachment(s)
For a restoration with some mild performance mod's I am about to complete (after finally healing from a torn rotator cuff and biceps tendon operation), we decided on installing the larger intake valves for improved touring performance. I have only test driven the car for less than 100 miles, but I am impressed by the extra "Oomph" those valves give in the midrange when I goose it. Zowie! The standard 5.9:1 Brumfield cylinder head, Jim Brierly camshaft regrind, and Model B carb and intake help, of course, but I've had those on other engines that didn't exhibit the extra power noticeable from this engine. Maybe at lower RPM's there won't be any appreciable difference versus the standard size intake valves, but when it really counts at road speeds, the engine fairly hums and bristles with extra get-up-and-go! And yes, based on dyno tests performed by Ron Kelley and others in the four-banger speed clique, we kept the exhaust valves at the standard size.
Ignore the marker pen numbers on the valve heads in the photo. The machine shop didn't follow my drawing and mislabeled them from rear to front. 'Doesn't matter, though: the valves would be correctly oriented anyway. :)
Marshall

nkaminar 07-29-2025 06:41 AM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

Marshall has made some other changes to enhance the performance of his engine. I don't think larger intake valve would do much for a completely stock engine. There is also some chance that the stock head would shade the valves so that the net effect would be diminished.

Joe K 07-29-2025 07:47 AM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

You might want to increase the size of the intake manifold to match the increased size of the valves.

Port polishing and "reaming the intake manifold" can accomplish this.

Ford themselves went with this in the "upgrade" from the Model A engine to the Model B - and which is probably the biggest reason for the jump to 50hp from 40hp.

All effort to make the engine "breathe" better.

And to continue the thought there is the gentleman who put a "blower" on his Model A engine - and for a $3K investment brought the engine to 75 horsepower.


Joe K

nkaminar 07-29-2025 08:29 AM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

Torque vs. Horsepower. Higher compression will provide greater torque and a little boost in horsepower. To double the horsepower you have to up the rpm quite a lot which means better breathing. Larger carburetor, large intake, different cam, minor porting just to clean up the intake passages, etc. A stock motor will not last long at the higher rpm. So there are some modifications to do there too. The best breathing will be with an overhead valve conversion.

ModelA29 08-01-2025 08:54 PM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

A lot of tech and physics that wasn't around in the 1920s enters into it. When the intake valve opens the engine is filled by air that has about 14 psi. When the exhaust valve is opened the air is forced out under greater pressure so a smaller valve will get the job done. The intake charge air/fuel is also denser than after the fuel is burned and the air heated so the less dense exhaust gases are easier to expel.

Bruce of MN 08-02-2025 04:54 AM

Re: Larger intake valves
 

Also, the dropping piston draws a vacuum to draw air and fuel in and to power the wiper.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.