![]() |
Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. A Chicago Branch Letter of Feb. 12, 1929 had this to say: "Limited quantities of Model A engines are now available for experimental and manufacturing purposes that have one or more undersize crankshaft pin bearings, and sometimes an undersize camshaft. These ARE NOT for replacement purposes, or for school/college educational purposes. Such engines are to be stamped with an 'S' in front of the star on the motor plate."
Has anyone heard about these special engines, or run across any of them? I have heard about some Model A engines being used in Marine and Industrial applications, and presume they were 'first quality/perfect' engines. BUT THESE? Lincoln. |
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. Interesting, and this is the first I've heard of such a thing.
I wonder just what Ford had in mind for the engines if they weren't for schools and educational purposes? |
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. You made it, I am guessing this is your No 25000 posting! :)
|
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. 1 Attachment(s)
I have an "S" in front of my number. In fact it is clearly "SOS" followed by numbers.
The engine has also been restamped below, which is on my New Mexico title. I wish I knew what the other stamp means. Maybe you have provided a clue. |
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. When Chief worked part time at a Ford Dealer, he literally "built" cars with parts from the SCRAP BIN!
Chiefs' Son, Bill W. |
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. Ford was not big on wasting stuff.
It is likely the stuff that failed production specs got used someplace. I would not be surprised if items that failed production specs got put out for replacement parts. It was ok for a mechanic to spend time fitting, but not the production worker. My brother believes some of the stuff that people bought NOS laying the shelf for decades may have been on the shelf because it never fit. |
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. I have seen that stamp and it is from the "Secretary Of State" new numbering for replacement engine.
|
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. Quote:
|
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. Quote:
It appears that parts made later, after A production, were not built as well. They were likely contracted out. I was told that some known 40's production flywheels were not balanced very well right from the box. |
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. Quote:
|
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. Quote:
|
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. 2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Yes, but there is more to that story. Back in the day, Ford was not the only company stamping fenders. For example, do a search on Fostoria Steel Fender or Detroit Body Die. Both these companies along with several others made fenders for Model-As that are/were very close to an OEM Ford fender. There have been many of these fenders that have been sold as NOS but in reality were aftermarket. There are many other items such as Ammeters, Ign. Points, Coils, Water Pumps, etc. that were all passed off as NOS because they were so close to design and aesthetics. This has always been a problem for restorers, ...and was such a problem for Ford even during the period when Model-As were being built that Ford described such parts as 'gyp' parts and warned his Agencies to not use these parts. Now as to NORS, I think you will find that is a term that surfaced during the 1960s to label items that were similar in design & function, but not close enough to look original. Spring Shackles, Suspension parts, Radiators, engine parts, starter switches, wiring harnesses, etc., etc. all fell into this category. More to the point where these were cheaper items that JC Whitney, Sears, Warshawskys (sp) and other auto parts stores sold during the after war periods. I guess I would say that a few were of decent quality but most, -while decent by today's standards were still not as good as what Ford manufactured. Use the Bulldog brand of suspension parts. They made spindle bolts (King Pins) and shackles for the Model-A which are very good however they were not manufactured like the original items with regard to materials and forging. Go look at an old Wirey Joe harness, --close but no cigar. And, to confuse the entire rating system, when is old brand-new reproduction parts made in the 60s different from NORS? Many of those items made by Rick's of Shawnee Mission and Tommy Trailor's Specialized Auto have been laying around on shelves for the last 40-50 years and are often mistaken as NORS parts!! :eek: . |
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. Quote:
I would like to know more about it for my car's history. Thanks |
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. Quote:
|
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. Lincoln: Where did you see the Chicago Branch letter of Feb 12, 1929 ?
|
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. On Marco's website, he talked about 'NOS' parts he rounded up for his 1930 Dlx. Roadster restoration, that sometimes they had to be 'tweaked' a bit to fit right.
No doubt some of these parts that are being talked about. Factory rejects perhaps. |
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. Quote:
Some were known to cut the purity of salt with gypsum, of lesser value in days of yore. Good synonyms would be counterfeit, knock-off, look-a-like, fake etc. so getting gypped meant paying for the real deal and getting a knock-off. |
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. Quote:
|
Re: Ford authorized sale of "imperfect" model a engines. Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.