![]() |
Rear main Where could I find a rear main that is .020 or .030 oversize?
Who sells them? Thanks |
Re: Rear main Quote:
If the Model A crankshaft has been turned .020", then you need undersized babbit in the caps. It would be thicker by .020", but the actual diameter is undersized. |
Re: Rear main Tom, wouldn't the Babbitt need to be oversized to make up the difference with the crankshaft journal being undersized? :confused: :confused: :confused: :o
|
Re: Rear main Tom is right it is called a undersize bearing. If it was a insert you would ask for a .020 under size bearing.
|
Re: Rear main Yeah that's what I meant. I was referring to the crankshaft. Sorry about that. Rough weekend I suppose.
|
Re: Rear main But , then again it's how you look at it. It would be an oversized bearing cap and an undersized crank journal...?
I think I found one at Ron's machine shop |
Re: Rear main A clear case of inverse postulatum. If a hole represents an area of nothing and you make it bigger, do you have less?
|
Re: Rear main Quote:
No, it would be an under size crank, and an under size bearing. So, if the crank is .020 under size, and the bearing is .020 over size, then the oil, or shaft clearance would be .040 thousandths. |
Re: Rear main Calling a .020 under size bearing over size is like calling a brake shoe a brake pad. It just is not right. We have been calling them under size bearings all my life.
|
Re: Rear main Time to re-babbit
|
Re: Rear main "Undersized" is the correct term. Here's why: Say a crankshaft journal is factory machined at 2" diameter. That would make the inside diameter of the bearing 2.001" or 2.002", for oil clearance. After many miles, the crankshaft journal wears out-of-round. To avoid needing a new crank, the old one gets it's journals ground down to make the journal round again. Say it required grinding off .010" of metal to make it round. Now measure the journal and you will find a diameter of 1.980", which is less than the original 2", thus the shaft is now 'undersized". And, of course, the inside diameter of the bearing must also be reduced, to 1.981' or 1.982" for proper oil clearance. Thus it, too, is "undersized".
|
Re: Rear main 31 RPU asked about where to get a rear main! Here is my answer: J Franklin (#10) is right. While I know in the old days Ford did sell main caps off the shelf, with the technology we have, I think it would be pretty hard, or at least a big production to pour and then cut just a main cap. One solution might be to check whatever non-running engines you might have access to and see if there is a rear main in one of them that is useable and the right size as a patch until you can get the engine re-babbited.
|
Re: Rear main Quote:
http://www.weather.net/zarg/ZarPages/stevenWright.html Joe K |
Re: Rear main Quote:
|
Re: Rear main Quote:
It must just be a little faster then light to keep from getting run over! |
Re: Rear main I collect good ones at swap meets. You never know when you might need one.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.