Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild Had my engine rebuilt, new bearings, balanced crank, high lift cam, lightened flywheel, v8 clutch, bigger intake valves, high compression head. I have about 200 miles on it now. Starter would hardly turn the engine over to start it, so I took it to a reputable shop that rebuilds starters. He put a new armature in it, and thought it was good to go. I installed it, and it will start it, but still turns over very slow. I installed a new start switch, cleaned the surfaces where the starter bolts to the engine, new battery, new cables, grounded from the battery to the frame, and to the transmission. About all I can do to turn it over with the crank. Do I just need to drive it some more and wait for it to break-in?
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild Do you have the proper size battery cable ? I use double ought ( 00 )!
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild Mike, Your last sentence tells me you know what you should do with it. As you ay, It will free-up with use so use it. That's what they were made for.
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild Also check that you have a good ground path for our starter. After the engine and starter rebuild, both are probably beautifully painted to the point where there's little bare metal contact between the starter and engine. Scrape off some paint behind the starter bolt ears and where they bolt to the engine to get a good ground.
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild Quote:
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild It’s possible that the engine rebuilder got things too tight. I would remove the spark plugs and turn the engine over with the crank. If it is difficult to turn then it might take some time for the cylinders to break in and be looser when turning by hand and hopefully your starter will turn faster! It’s also possible that the bearings were set up with LESS than required clearance!
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild A Model A requires more piston clearance than a modern car.
Years alo I had a engine re-bored at a local shop. They gave the pistons about 4 thousands clearance. When warm the engine was very tight for a long time. |
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild Could be timing, high compression head, clearances, or needs breaking-in.
John |
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild Thanks for all the ideas. I did clean the area where the starter meets the bell housing, and I made my own battery cables out of welding cable so I could put a disconnect switch in. I think just driving it is the solution. Thanks again!
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild NOT Your Problem but..... careless assembly using three 'too long' starter bolts that will lock against the flywheel has caused many unnecessary engine removals to re check motor clearances that where correct.....
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild Quote:
‘high compression” head How high compression ? |
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild Quote:
You might jumper the terminals on the disconnect switch with a heavy cable like a jumper cable and see if it cranks faster. |
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild I would either disconnect one side of the cutoff switch and bolt it to the side on disconnect switch or a jumper cable across the cutoff switch.
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild Mike, It sounds like you are doing all the right things. My only suggestion is to check the voltage at the starter terminal when cranking the engine over. That will tell you a lot. Maybe you need a new battery.
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild If you can barely turn it over with the crank, It is too tight. I just worked on one that had one rod at less than .0005" and it was too much for the starter. It had just been rebuilt by a big name rebuilder. One shim solved the problem.
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild Thanks for the ideas! I will check the disconnect switch, and voltage. 6 to 1 high compression head. I will try those ideas, and post again. Thanks! Mike
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild Rod clearance is critical, as stated, even one shim can make a world of difference.
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild I had the same issue, same rebuild configuration as you have.
After the first 500 miles it was much better. After 1K it now starts great. During the first 500 miles I was a bit careful on where I parked, hoping to get a roll and bump start. I also kept the idle up a bit to prevent stalling, and having to push it to the side of the road. |
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild When i got the optima battery my car cranked faster, fast enough that i was accused of converting to 12V ---what battery do you have and how old is it?
originally with the first engine rebuild on my car the starter had trouble, loosened up after 500-700 miles, then it got loose enough to knock at 3000 miles |
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild Quote:
Also, another item often overlooked is ring end gap. Not enough gap on even one ring is enough to make an engine overly stiff, especially when hot. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.