|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-13-2014, 01:09 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC KiWi-L100 available here
Posts: 2,963
|
Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
What is the general consensus on tube versus Rebuilt lever shock on our old fords ? Not worried about originality . Pros & cons ?
All opinions welcomed !!! Thanks Cheers Tony |
04-13-2014, 01:32 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,409
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
04-13-2014, 02:02 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,007
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
If authenticity is not a concern, tube shocks will offer much better handling characteristics than lever action shocks.
Also, there are various designs of tube shocks available to meet your specific desires.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
04-13-2014, 03:21 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 226
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
I replaced my lever action shocks on my 39 1/2 ton for tube shocks because I use my truck for a working vehicle. I was finding the Houdaille shocks would sag with a load on the truck and cause erratic steering. This didn't occur without a load so I replaced all four corners with the tubes. I think they are far superior for actual road use than the lever action shocks. Toby
|
04-13-2014, 07:05 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,687
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
Lever ones probably work very well but they would have to be in tip top condition , I replaced mine that where well worn with tube shocks [Pete & Jakes], when I hit the freeway I was sitting on 65 MPH and I didn't even know it, best thing I ever did.
__________________
"Came too close to dying to stop living now!" |
04-13-2014, 07:59 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 6,646
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
__________________
Alan |
|
04-13-2014, 08:31 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 5,762
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
Unless, of course, you replace the standard tube shocks with air shocks like I just did to lift the back end when loaded.
__________________
Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome) "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” *Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness |
04-13-2014, 09:15 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida and Penna.
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
Either shocks work good if installed properly. Tube shocks need the correct operational range as far as stroke. I have seen them to short and pull the mounting bracket off the frame or axle. You may not realize but mounted on to much of a sideward angle shoves the body to the left and right. I bought a 39 convertible 10 or so years ago that had both the original rear shocks and tubular. The fronts were original only. The tube shocks were mounted on a sideward angle pushing the body to the left and right into the nuts that hold the stock shock links on into the inner wall of the rear tires. This caused a grove about 5/8" wide and over 3/16" deep on inner walls which happened double white walls. Newer trucks have tubular shocks on a big angle, front to rear. Some have the angle of both shocks to the front or rear and some have one shock to the front and the other towards the rear. I can't figure that out but it seems to work. G.M.
__________________
www.fordcollector.com |
04-14-2014, 05:21 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 855
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
Just as an alternative thought - I wanted to retain an original look but wanted an upgraded funtion ie stiffer control of the ride - I had Bill W rebuild my original 35 lever rears but with a heaver oil grade, also swtiched out the front 35 levers to the larger body 36 units - again heaver oil. I can not recall if the valving was modified for stiffer action or if that was even possible. Perhaps Bill W will chime in - but the bottom line is that I like the stiffer controlled ride! PS ... I also have a 1940 swaybar which helps overall control as well.
|
04-15-2014, 02:06 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lower Hutt , New Zealand
Posts: 2,126
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
My 48 has tubes on the rear and levers on the the front. The levers or at least one of them is "stuffed" the front rides terrible ( all other front end suspension bits replaced).
Can you get a kit for converting 41/48 fronts to tubes? thanks GB
__________________
"you can't make honey out of dog sh*t" "You're a long time looking at the lid" |
04-15-2014, 08:29 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: At my kitchen table in Santa Rosa, Ca
Posts: 2,903
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
I had no shocks on my 36 pickup for a long time. then I dug up a good set of original shocks. man what a better ride, like a bran new pickup!
__________________
If it would have been a snake it would have bit ya! i can't spell my way out of a paper bag! |
04-15-2014, 08:58 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: shirley ny
Posts: 992
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
I installed tube shock kit on my 41 ,I have diamond back radials and between both I have a very soft smooth ride I think the radials contribute most to a smooth safe ride
|
04-15-2014, 07:54 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 514
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
I converted my 1945 1/2 ton to tubular shocks by copying the shock mounts etc in a 56 1/2 ton, and using the correct shocks for the 56. I had to add a cross member in the rear to mount the top of the shocks to and make both top and bottom mounts for the front. Works well for me.
|
04-22-2014, 03:51 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lower Hutt , New Zealand
Posts: 2,126
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
Quote:
thanks GB
__________________
"you can't make honey out of dog sh*t" "You're a long time looking at the lid" |
|
04-22-2014, 04:19 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Orange County, Ca.
Posts: 685
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
Quote:
The '48 had a hole in the axle between the wishbone boss and the king pin for a tube shock stud. You can find a upper bracket that bolts right in where the friction shock is with the right angles. First 2 are my '47, I did have to drill a hole in the axle for the shock stud, the last picture is for an old kit. I heard that the ear breaks off with the way it's mounted in the kit ('46-'48). I might have another set of the uppers. Last edited by 1oldtimer; 04-22-2014 at 04:28 AM. |
|
04-22-2014, 01:34 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: N.W.England
Posts: 439
|
Re: Shocks -tube vs Lever ?
Took the coupe out for a test ride yesterday after fitting tube shocks to the rear....it drove really nice and improved the ride noticeably .....next on the list is to do the fronts.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|