Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2017, 12:55 PM   #21
40 Deluxe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,779
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by JWL View Post
FoMoCo never decided to broach the transfer area because it was a performance enhancing technique. It was done to help prevent crack formation at the upper level of the eyebrow. The only debate is about whether or not it was helpful in that regard.
I haven't had experience with factory relieved blocks. Do they crack any less often than non-relieved blocks?
40 Deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2017, 02:14 PM   #22
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40 Deluxe View Post
I haven't had experience with factory relieved blocks. Do they crack any less often than non-relieved blocks?
Instead of the narrow top area between valves and cylinder the wider area you get from the relieve is distributing the heat better and cracks donīt have a good sharp edge to start from.
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-05-2017, 03:35 PM   #23
supereal
Senior Member
 
supereal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

Porting and relieving is usually not worth the effort, and only then if you have experience in doing it. Last year a customer brought in his T-Bird that he bought on line. It didn't run right, particularly at low speeds. We pulled the heads and found that someone had relieved the block so far that the top piston ring was exposed! The only "fix" was finding a different block, not an easy or cheap proposition.
supereal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2017, 06:09 PM   #24
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,527
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

What engine was in the T-bird?
flatjack9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:52 AM   #25
scooder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,593
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

A flathead Tbird??
scooder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 11:03 AM   #26
Ross F-1
Senior Member
 
Ross F-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,438
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
I think he means it was decked? Surely an OHV Y-block?
__________________
'52 F-1, EAB flathead
Ross F-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 07:23 PM   #27
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,527
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

That had to be one hell of a decking job if the top ring was exposed. Something does not add up. How would you ever get an intake manifold to fit if it was a Y block.

Last edited by flatjack9; 12-06-2017 at 07:28 PM.
flatjack9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:00 PM   #28
JSeery
Member Emeritus
 
JSeery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

This is the second time supereal has posted something about a T-bird having what sounds like a flathead engine problem. Wish he would elaborate.

Last edited by JSeery; 12-06-2017 at 08:05 PM.
JSeery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:03 PM   #29
Lawrie
Senior Member
 
Lawrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Qld, Australia
Posts: 4,221
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

Is there not some debate over why the truck blocks were relieved, this is in regards to the 99a engines.
Lawrie
Lawrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 11:02 PM   #30
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,527
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSeery View Post
This is the second time supereal has posted something about a T-bird having what sounds like a flathead engine problem. Wish he would elaborate.
I was going to say the same thing, but couldn't remember for sure.
flatjack9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 01:17 AM   #31
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawrie View Post
Is there not some debate over why the truck blocks were relieved, this is in regards to the 99a engines.
Lawrie
Two reasons come to mind right away...less risk for cracks and to lower compression driving them hard with the less good fuel back then.
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 02:25 AM   #32
Lawrie
Senior Member
 
Lawrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Qld, Australia
Posts: 4,221
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

Why would the relief lessen the chance of cracking,would you not be better off with more metal in that area,also if they wanted to loose some compression why not use a cyl head with a larger chamber,like 81T or the like.and the relief only takes a small amount out off the chamber
Lawrie
Lawrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 03:36 AM   #33
HotRodmicky
Senior Member
 
HotRodmicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 249
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

I wouldnt relieve it for an even simpler reason ....
Its tough to get the pistion rings in the bore.
Double tough if have metric rings ( which i would use)
HotRodmicky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 06:38 AM   #34
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawrie View Post
Why would the relief lessen the chance of cracking,would you not be better off with more metal in that area,also if they wanted to loose some compression why not use a cyl head with a larger chamber,like 81T or the like.and the relief only takes a small amount out off the chamber
Lawrie
The sharp small area between valve and cylinder heats/cools faster then a larger flat area.
Any small area heating up faster then the rest of the block under load is a potential problem.
And the difference in heat gives tension in that narrow strip which becomes an excellent place for a crack to start.
Machining nice radiuses on every sharp edge would probably help some to.
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 11:18 AM   #35
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,861
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

I don't think there is a very good reason for relieving, Yes blending in all the surfaces mighr do the same think and not reduce the CR. BUT!!! These are street engines. Think??
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 12:03 PM   #36
cdan34
Senior Member
 
cdan34's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mill Valley, Calif.
Posts: 120
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

I have had, through the years, four flatheads. I have relieved them all and the compression was brought up in other ways. I know there is a debate on this one. Here are my thoughts; on the exhaust stroke the pressure is towards the top of the combustion chamber. Likewise the top and side of valves. When relieving you open an area that would let some of the exhaust out 90 degrees
to the valve. I think this would help relieve pressure. Wouldn't that be a good thing ? I don't know about the horsepower gain and some of you guys are much more involved in this then I am.

So what is lost by relieving the block ? I would think the engine could breath better.

cdan34
cdan34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 12:21 PM   #37
Kahuna
Senior Member
 
Kahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,617
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

Scotty
Another thing might be to rethink the transmission. Maybe the std truck 3 speed would be a better option, unless you really need that real low 1st gear?
Kahuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 12:22 PM   #38
JWL
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fitzgerald, Georgia
Posts: 2,204
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

I have seen only a few factory relieved blocks. Probably a dozen or less. A few(I think 3) were cracked This might be a slightly lower percentage than non-relieved blocks.

When the exhaust valve opens there is a "blow-down" of pressure because the entire chamber contains combustion pressure. That is why the exhaust has such a loud sound. There can be 80 or more PSI blasting out of the chamber(depending on the engine).

After conducting more than 400 flow tests I find no reason for relieving unless there is a desire to increase residual exhaust gas contamination or lower the CR.
JWL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 12:32 PM   #39
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,320
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

There are two things that I don't even consider anymore when building a flathead : relieving the block and exhaust dividers. BTW, I have a nice, new pair of the latter in their original packaging; anybody want 'em?
tubman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 02:56 PM   #40
Scotty's 52 F3
Senior Member
 
Scotty's 52 F3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Marana, AZ.
Posts: 414
Default Re: Building for Torque Porting Question

Kahuna, I don't really NEED the granny gear. I have only used it starting out on hills when I loaded the heck out of the truck. The engine is really tired though. I may not have to use it when I have a fresh engine.

I have thought about a T5. The T98 works and is paid for so it'll have to do. I may gradually collect what I need to swap another trans at a later date though.

I trying to keep it a freshened up old truck more than turning it into a street rod. I have to admit, an overdrive would really be nice though.

Budget is a big concern. It's taken me two years to go through all the systems as I drove it. A little at a time as I could afford. It's time to tear it down for body, paint and engine rebuild.

Thanks for all the replies.
Scotty's 52 F3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 AM.