|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-07-2022, 09:04 AM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 92
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
Thanks a lot everyone for all the input.
@Mart We tried to pull the pan yesterday, but thought we knew better than the repair manual. We couldn't get the pan past those radius rod (?). We did raise the engine though. The manual tells to turn the crankshaft, but the engine is stuck. We'll give it another try tomorrow. and loosen those rods. I'll check out your videos, thanks. So the motor is still in the car. I was hoping to get a good impression on it's state before pulling the engine out. I did get a peek after lowering the pan a bit...same rusty wet look though. Didn't check the pan rail yet. Thanks for that mounting tip....we'll keep it in mind in case we pull the engine. The car's history isn't really clear. It spent the last 20 years in a barn in Pennsylvania. It was last registered in '66, also in Pennsylvania. It looks like they did indeed work on the engine before. Till now everything came off pretty easily. Even the rusted exhaust link pipe and the exhaust at the manifolds. We inspected the bottom of the car. Looks pretty solid, besides the obvious surface rust. The car seems complete as well. I did take a hit at the left front some point, braking the bumper bracket and bending the fender and grill a little bit. It caused the left headlight to be a bit closer to the cowling. The chassis seems straight though. Depending on the engine being an LB engine or not and salvageable or not I'll have to decide what route to take here. It won't be a full resoration in any case, but a technical restoration and just drive it. Slight interior improvement, rust treatment on the outside and go. Maybe juice brakes, depending on it's stopping abilities.[emoji16] Dennis Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-T720 met Tapatalk |
12-07-2022, 10:21 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,759
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
Whatever happens, I can't imagine a scenario where the motor does not need to come out. I would advise just bite the bullet and pull it. (I'm a poet). If in doubt yank it out. (told you).
Mart. |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
12-07-2022, 12:23 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,449
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
I'd have to agree with Mart. The condition warrants work that is much better and easier done out of the car. As was mentioned, an engine stand adapter that connects the the exhaust ports is much better than worrying about cracking the rear bell area. The casting is not all that thick on the rear end there.
The one rusty piston is likely the sticking point. Just getting the valves out is a big job and they should come out to insure serviceability. If the engine was not so internally fowled and the cylinders were all still void of corrosion, things would be different. That one is just beyond that state. Everything needs to be cleaned & checked. Last edited by rotorwrench; 12-07-2022 at 12:31 PM. |
12-07-2022, 02:14 PM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 92
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
Yeah, we'll probably pull the engine. I measured the bore btw, says 3.08". As far as this is accurate, the measuring caliper was a relatively cheap one.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk |
12-07-2022, 02:42 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,759
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
That's 17.5 thou over standard. Could be 15, could be 20 depending on how accurate the measuring method. Any marks on the good pistons?
standard bore is 3-1/16" |
12-07-2022, 04:13 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,108
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
12-07-2022, 04:21 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,449
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
It would 3 1/16" or 3.0625. If it was previouy overhauled with a bore job then the oversize should be on top of the pistons.
|
12-07-2022, 04:48 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Powell, TN
Posts: 2,509
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
Its hard to tell from the pics but most of those engines had sleeves. The easiest way to work that bad cyl may be to break the piston out driving from below, worst case cutting the rod into, then -putting a sleeve in that cyl bored to match what you bore the other cyl's. As wore as the engine is I would suspect it will need boring all cyls.
|
12-07-2022, 06:25 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,108
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
|
12-07-2022, 07:43 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,449
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
I think the tin can sleeves came later but it depends on which block it has. The 21-stud block doesn't have as much room for sleeves as the 24-stud blocks.
|
12-08-2022, 09:42 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Florida panhandle
Posts: 194
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
Does it have water pump block off plates on the block just below the head mounted water pumps?
|
12-08-2022, 10:22 AM | #32 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 92
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
|
12-08-2022, 12:23 PM | #33 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 92
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
Well, we didn't manage to get the oil pan off. The engine is stuck, so we couldn't turn the crankshaft to clear the pan inside. So, the unevitable is next....taking the engine out.
I cleaned a small piece of the oil pan rail, but didn't see any cracks (yet). I did get a peek inside though. Same rusty appearance. I was able to measure the distance between the most rear visible studs. If I'm correct, that's the rear main bearing? Measures around 3 1/4". So am I looking at an LB engine!?[emoji850] Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk |
12-08-2022, 01:18 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: so cal, placerville, vegas
Posts: 1,394
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
Regarding that 3.08 measurement.... It depends on how that was obtained. If he measured BELOW the ridge, it likely just indicates a worn cylinder, based on standard bore. If he measured the diameter ON the ridge, then the 'puzzle' indicated in the previous posts still applies. (Opinion) In any event... I see a lot of work, and a fixable engine. And, if an LB, in my opinion, I'd go for it. (I'm prejudiced, I have some good memories with an LB.)
|
12-10-2022, 10:53 AM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Corbett OR
Posts: 233
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
Don't forget how hard it is to find rod bearings, and how expensive they are!
|
12-10-2022, 11:09 AM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,527
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
Quote:
|
|
12-10-2022, 12:23 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Orcas Island Washington
Posts: 4,963
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
Believe me, when I can 'start 'em in the field' and drive them away, that is my favorite kind of old truck adventure. I have pulled that off maybe six times in 50 years of picking up old fords. Those with mechanical brakes were extra fun because you actually could start driving them as is (if one happens to live on the back side of a rural island). BUT.... your engine is not a candidate for that particular brand of fun. They are sooo difficult to work in in the vehicle and sooo nice on a stand. Do yourself a favor and pull that bad tooth out. It will feel much better after that!
__________________
Owner/Operator of 'Jailbar Ranch' on the side of Mt. Pickett. Current stable consists of 1946 1/2 ton pickup turned woodie wagon with FH V8, 1947 Tonner Pickup (red) mostly stock with exception of a cummins 6at turbo diesel, 1946 Tonner Pickup (green) with 226 cu in 6 cyl flathead, 1979 Toyota landcruiser wagon, completely encased in 1947 Ford Jailbar sheet metal. Ok, cornbinder rear fenders..... 'Rusty ol' floorboards, hot on their feet' (Alan Jackson) |
12-13-2022, 11:24 AM | #38 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 92
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
Ok, working towards the inevitable...taking the engine out. We removed the grill and radiator as well as the passenger toe board and the trans cover plate. Next will be the shifter and clutch linkage.
Any tips/pointers for getting the engine and trans out? Where is the (approx.) center of gravity of the engine+trans? Might help in lifting... Thanks. Dennis Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk |
12-13-2022, 11:50 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,759
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
Somewhere near here.
|
12-13-2022, 12:13 PM | #40 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 92
|
Re: '36 221 - rebuildable??
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|