|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-29-2011, 07:19 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Orange County, NY
Posts: 162
|
Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
After it stopped raining yesterday I went out to work on the car. I removed the fan belt, filled with coolant to the top of the neck of the radiator and ran the engine as suggested. After it got warm I increasing the rpm’s and did notice some bubbles coming up. Shut it down, pulled the distributor and re-torqued the head bolts while the engine was still warm. I got anywhere from a quarter to a half turn out of all the bolts. Started the engine again with no belt….no bubbles, put the belt back on and ran it, circulation but no bubbles. Looks like I had combustion gas getting in to the coolant system. I hope that was it because I do not really want to spend $600 on a new radiator.
I then took it for a long ride (8 or 9 miles this time) at mostly 50 -55 mph. Had no coolant at all gushing out from under the cap (didn’t do anything to the filler neck or cap – it still just keeps turning around and around). The water temp stayed in the normal driving temp range (I have a temp gauge installed), but it was not overheating before either. When I got back to the house I looked in the radiator and could not see coolant over the baffle. I put in 2 quarts of coolant to bring it up to the top of the filler neck. I know it is not suppose to be that high but just wanted to see how much I lost out of the overflow tube. From what I have read the radiator seeks it own level of coolant, but should I be able to see it even if it goes below the baffle?? I read posts where it is suggested that the overflow tube should be bent back toward the engine (mine points to the front) to slow down the fluid loss if the water pump is pushing the coolant faster than the radiator can take it. Is this a common practice? I looked at my tube and since it comes out of the baffle toward the back, in order to bend it back it will be too long to fit under the top of the filler neck. Should it be cut to fit? I am reluctant to do anything that I am unable to undo. Another response suggested placing a nail in the drain to slow down the coolant draining out. Won’t this block all the coolant from going out or will the vibration that is created in just running the engine keep the nail jumping around so just a little will get out? Looks like I may be getting to the bottom of this problem. Mark |
08-29-2011, 07:40 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,444
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
Try taking it for another run- if the good Lord is on your side it may just have been an airlock .
Where do you think the water's going- evaporating? running out through the overflow? Leaking intothe sump? ( Oil looks ok and not mayonaissse?, oil level not risen by 2 quarts I trust?) |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
08-29-2011, 07:57 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: santa cruz, calif
Posts: 2,011
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
Good work with the leaking head gasket diagnosis. Its not unusual for coolant to be just below the baffle. If you can see it through the hole in the baffle the tube runs through, its OK.
To bend the tube back, use a phillips screw driver. Place it down the tube at the point you want to start the bend. As it begins to bend, raise the point of the screwdriver as you bend it while supporting it inside the curve, to create a smooth sweep. Do this in careful small movements. Due to the sweep, the tube should not extend over the top of the neck. The procedure is described in the Service Bulletins. follow this link to an older post on this: https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?p=61927 Installing a thermostat has always reduced the excess flow rate enough for me to avoid grinding the impellers. Last edited by pat in Santa Cruz; 08-29-2011 at 08:05 AM. |
08-29-2011, 09:37 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Orange County, NY
Posts: 162
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
Hey John, it's not going into the oil pan as the oil is nice an clean and the level is where it should be. I assumed it is now going out the overflow tube since retorquing the head bolts stopped the combustion gasses from blowing the coolant out the top of the radiator. See below for what I just found.
Pat, thank you for the link that shows how to bend the overflow tube. I just went out to look at mine and found that the coolant is no longer at the top of the filler neck where I left it yesterday. Took another quart or so to fill up again. Unfortunately I also noticed that the radiator core is wet with coolant. Some of the tubes may be leaking and I did not see that before when everything was always wet from the coolant out from under the cap. I blew all the coolant off and will see if it gets wet again in a few hours from leaks. If the core is leaking, looks like a new radiator is in the cards as I don’t like fooling around with 81 year old stuff that is a critical element is the system. Oh well, the wife is going to love this. Thanks again for the link, Mark |
08-29-2011, 10:36 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 27,582
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
My original radiator had just a trace of dampness near the top right front of the core. A tube of stop leak fixed it.
|
08-29-2011, 10:38 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,444
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
08-29-2011, 10:39 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,444
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
Ha, tom. your post beat mine by 2 seconds there!
|
08-29-2011, 03:02 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: santa cruz, calif
Posts: 2,011
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
If the copper is still strong, a competent radiator guy can solder up a few pin holes. Its a common repair. If there are way too many pin holes, then the core has to be replaced. If it can be saved, you will save about 350-500 bucks over a new core. Its worth it to have an expert look at it. If its clogged, having it rodded out at the same time could result in a repaired radiator that will last you a long time and cool well. Find a local A club and ask around who is the best radiator guy in your area.
|
08-29-2011, 04:35 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: FRESNO, CA
Posts: 12,560
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
The nail is foolproof, it doesn't pressurize the system, as it does it's little drunken dance, it just stops unnecessary splash over and coolant loss.
You 'gotta get your cap sealed, maybe it just needs a new gasket! After torqueing your head, add a jar of Bars-Leaks for any tiny seepages that might still exist. Seriously, you need a 160 degree thermostat for flow control. Remember, the engine is a water HEATER, the radiator is a water cooler, and a thermostat IS needed to co-ordinate the two systems. The thermostat is constantly altering the flow as necessary for maximum cooling. I don't man to sound COCKY, but I know what works for me, and it gets 110 to 112 degrees here, and with my 6 blade fan, it never overheats! If stupid 2 blade fans pulled more air, then all modern cars would run them. Now, I willl put away my soapbox and HUSH!
__________________
"THE ASSISTANT GURU OF STUFF" Last edited by BILL WILLIAMSON; 08-29-2011 at 04:37 PM. Reason: TYPO |
08-29-2011, 05:20 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 9,115
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
|
08-29-2011, 06:03 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: new britain,ct 06052
Posts: 9,390
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
Bill Williamson: There was a long "discussion" here a while back about 2/4/6 blade fans, and the consensus was, as I recall, that a 2 blade pulled more air. JMO
Paul in CT |
08-29-2011, 07:43 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: FRESNO, CA
Posts: 12,560
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
Probably because more 2 blade fan, fans logged in than did 6 blade fan, fans.
__________________
"THE ASSISTANT GURU OF STUFF" |
08-30-2011, 07:16 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: new britain,ct 06052
Posts: 9,390
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
As I recall the results came either on a dyno stand or under controlled conditions.
Paul in CT |
08-30-2011, 07:33 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,599
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
Quote:
If I remember correctly the test used a meter that measured airflow in MPH. Maybe similar to the one that HVAC guys use to setup heating and A/C in buildings. Might have been John Lavoy's Model A Times? I wonder which 4 blade fan they used in the tests? There are 4 -5 different ones with various pitch on the blades. There is the "Mark" fan and the one made from 2 flat blades bolted to hub and the 4 blade Ford design. The Ford design has consideralbly more pitch than the Mark one and is 15 7/8 diameter. Maybe John is "reading the mail". Last edited by Benson; 08-30-2011 at 07:41 PM. |
|
08-30-2011, 11:31 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: FRESNO, CA
Posts: 12,560
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
Maybe test stand results may not be the same as in a car, hood on, and side pans on and climbing the Sierras and on to the Mojave Desert. Most of our chapter cars here in Fresno are good with the 6 blade. Maybe we have a better air here on the LEFT coast!
__________________
"THE ASSISTANT GURU OF STUFF" |
08-31-2011, 08:44 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Montgomery,Texas
Posts: 115
|
Re: Update - New Guy - New Problem - Coolant Loss
Multi bladed fans will pull more volume and faster air speed that the 2 blade irregardless of the 2 blade pitch.In the early years of AC in family cars they always had more fan blades than the non ac cars. I had to remove the 4 blade on my flatty and install a 6 to keep it cool and it does the job.Major air flow is required to pass through the radiator to dissipate the heat period.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|