Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2015, 04:05 AM   #1
markwill
Junior Member
 
markwill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 16
Default Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

I've been a model T guy for 25 years and served as the President to the Model T Ford Club International, and in all those years the four seat open model T car was always called the Touring by Ford. However, when the second model A (yes, that's another mystery) came out in 1928 they called the four seat open car a Phaeton. The word Phaeton had been around since the curved dash cars prior to the advent of the model T in 1909, but Ford never used this word, as far as I know, during manufacturing of the model T.

Thus, does anyone know why Ford started using the older word, Phaeton, when the 1928 Ford was introduced?

I still have't found the answer as to why Ford went back to the top of the alphabet, A, with the release of the 1928 Ford either when clearly there was a Model A Ford built and sold in 1903.

Mark
markwill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 04:46 AM   #2
Mike V. Florida
Senior Member
 
Mike V. Florida's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 14,054
Send a message via AIM to Mike V. Florida
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by markwill View Post
I still have't found the answer as to why Ford went back to the top of the alphabet, A, with the release of the 1928 Ford either when clearly there was a Model A Ford built and sold in 1903.

Mark
Story goes that the car was such a radical change from anything in the lineup before hand that it was it's own start of a new lineage and it needed to start with A again.

My guess in the touring/phaeton question, is that Henry wanted to distance the new A from the old T and was looking for a classier name for the car hence Phaeton.
__________________
What's right about America is that although we have a mess of problems, we have great capacity - intellect and resources - to do some thing about them. - Henry Ford II
Mike V. Florida is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 01-12-2015, 07:06 AM   #3
dave in australia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,170
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

Also, most of us Aussies call the phaeton a tourer.
dave in australia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 07:11 AM   #4
Royce P
Senior Member
 
Royce P's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 476
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

I suspect Edsel picked the name.
Royce P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 07:36 AM   #5
BRENT in 10-uh-C
Senior Member
 
BRENT in 10-uh-C's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Posts: 11,485
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

Hey Mr. Williams, great to see you here, ...and enjoyed sitting under your presidency!

I have one thought to add to your question, ...why didn't Ford call the 'A' Roadster a Runabout? Adding to that, he used the term Roadster on the 'T' in the early portion but later versions were named Runabouts.

While other's comments above are clearly plausible, I suspect we need to understand how two different men named Ford was involved. Defining each individual's exact duties regarding the Model-A will likely never be known. I suspect the naming fits into that category.
__________________
.

BRENT in 10-uh-C
.
www.model-a-ford.com
...(...Finally Updated!! )

.
BRENT in 10-uh-C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 10:48 AM   #6
Marshall V. Daut
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 2,083
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
It's commonly accepted that the Model "A" was evolutionary, not revolutionary. Nothing on the 1928 Model "A" was new, only "lifted" or altered from other cars already on the road. Run down the list of items stressed in Ford's sales promotion about the Model "A" (shock absorbers, three-speed transmission, safety glass windshield, single coil ignition, four-wheel brakes, etc.) and each one can be found in competitors' cars pre-dating the Model "A", sometimes by a decade or more. That does not take away from the Model "A" just because it was not revolutionary. Very few cars for the masses are revolutionary, other than perhaps the "Model T" (which was really a further refinement of the previous Models N, R and S). I consider using the best designs available at the time in the construction of the new Model "A" to be a wise application of the old adage not to reinvent the wheel. Why not use what had proven itself to be a good design?
Going back in Ford history to the letter "A" for the new model in 1928 (late 1927) has always been explained and accepted as gospel in response to the car being so radically different from the Model "T" that it was like starting all over again from the beginning of the alphabet. I have never been totally convinced this is the real reason. Consider the semantics and "sound" of applying the remainder of the alphabet following the letter "T". Can you imagine trying to sell the public on a car called the "Model U" or "Model V" or even "Model W"? Calling it the "Model X" would have resulted in choruses of derisive laughter as a mystery car and would have left itself wide open for a self-sustaining joke machine, as would calling it the "Model Y". Can't you just see the wags saying: "Y did you buy a Model "Y" Ford"? or disgruntled customers asking "Y did I buy a Model "Y"?" Finally, marketing a "Model Z" Ford would have been a company advertising department's worst nightmare. I realize that some foreign markets used oddball letters for their version of Fords, but these were always considered secondary markets. (My apologies to our foreign Model "A" owners for that statement, but it's true. )
So, what was left but to go back to a letter that few people would remember from a quarter century prior: "Model "A"". It even sounds pleasing and is marketable, as the letter "A" always has been. As far as I can tell, it was Floyd Clymer, who claimed in one of his 1950's books about the Model "A" Ford that the reason for choosing the letter "A" designation was because the new Ford was so revolutionary - which it patently was NOT. Old Floyd stepped on his own anatomy many times in his statements that proved to be incorrect. I believe this was another one of his SWAGs that sounds plausible on the surface. Can anyone furnish documented evidence that Ford went back to the letter "A" because its car was so revolutionary? If so, I stand corrected. But I'm guessing the company management just went along with this idea suggested by the advertising and/or marketing department.
Marshall
Marshall V. Daut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 11:13 AM   #7
rosenkranswa
Senior Member
 
rosenkranswa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Malvern, PA
Posts: 361
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

I think the answer to all these questions, as Marshall has suggested, has more to do with marketing than anything else. Ford was locked in a competitive struggle with GM and even Henry had to acquiese to Edsel to the need to compete - even to build what became the Model A. Its always important to remember that companies don't make decisions, people make decisions. If a decision doesn't make market sense, you have to start looking for personal emotional rationales. The decision to rename body types may be a little of both. Edsel was know to be enamoured of European styles, and that combined with the marketing need to distance Ford from the Model T somewhat could have combined to result in the mix of names.
__________________
Wayne @ Barb
Malvern

'19 T Speedster
'26 T Touring
'29 A Roadster
'30 AA Stakebed
'30 A Pickup
'30 A Town Sedan
'31 A Station Wagon
'38 Columbia Girls bike (WWII)
'40 Elgin Boys bike (WWII)
'42 Super Deluxe Tudor
'42 Willys MB Jeep
'43 Willys MBT Trailer
'43 M3A4 Hand Cart
'43 Harley Davidson 42WLA with sidecar
rosenkranswa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 08:26 PM   #8
DougVieyra
Senior Member
 
DougVieyra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Eureka, California
Posts: 1,716
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

The answers above indicate a good grasp of why the Ford Motor Company (specifically Edsel Ford) made the name change from Touring to Phaeton. It is reflected in the song that was popular at the time of the introduction of the NEW FORD : "Henry's Made A Lady Out of Lizzie".

The grand marques of the day - Lincoln, Packard, Cunningham, and the like, never had a two seat (or 3 with jump seats) open car with such a lowly (think Chevy, Ford, Dort, Dodge, Velie, etc.) moniker as 'Touring'. While the term 'Touring' was often seen in the teens & twenties, by the 1930's, the high-buck marques had all went to the more genteel and aristocratic "Phaeton". Ford was just joining the parade. Remember, by the time the NEW FORD came on the scene, the Ford Motor Company also had had the LINCOLN MOTOR CAR COMPANY (bought at Edsel's urging), for a good number of years.

Edsel was instrumental in working to bring the NEW FORD in line with the more prestigious Lincoln of the Ford line. In fact the NEW FORD (Model A) was often called 'The Baby Lincoln". As President of the Lincoln Motor Car Company Edsel brought a number of Lincoln elements to his development of the Ford Model A of 1928. Some did not work out (the multiple disc clutch), others did quite well. The name 'Phaeton' was one of many tactics to help the NEW FORD gain increased respect and 'panache'.

And I think he succeeded.

*P.S. - With my past ownership of several marques of the teens & '20's, I felt a kinship to the term "Touring", and had my Calif. DMV registration indicate that my 1928 Ford was a 'Touring'. That was over 50 years ago. And today, I still enjoy that it is registered as a 'Touring'.

- Doug Vieyra, Eureka, CAlif

Last edited by DougVieyra; 01-12-2015 at 08:33 PM.
DougVieyra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 08:48 PM   #9
Bulligen
Senior Member
 
Bulligen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Elgin Illinois
Posts: 735
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

I agree, The word Phaeton just conjures up the thought of a fancier automobile!
Bulligen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 09:24 PM   #10
Roadster62
Senior Member
 
Roadster62's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ridgefield, Ct
Posts: 3,439
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

There were horse drawn Phaetons, and bicycles called Roadsters, so the term sure wasn't "modern" in 1928. Bob
__________________
They don't have to run to be enjoyed. I'm here to enjoy the hobby, and enjoy the cars no matter what they look like. Most of the worlds problems are electrical.
Roadster62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 10:14 PM   #11
BlueSunoco
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Windy City
Posts: 937
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

The introduction of the V-8 killed the alphabetical model designation. Good thing otherwise where would we be today? Would a new Ford Mustang be, by now, the Model C 'cubed' or 'sub-three'?? Sounds pretty exciting only a 'Ford GT' can pull off the letter thing with any value, and or the GT40
BlueSunoco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 10:15 PM   #12
Marco Tahtaras
Senior Member
 
Marco Tahtaras's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,099
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

Worth considering


------------------------------------------------------------------------
__________________
http://www.abarnyard.com/
Marco Tahtaras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 11:54 PM   #13
markwill
Junior Member
 
markwill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 16
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

Great insight by all, thank you for the wonderful responses. I'm sure marketing had something to do with it, but I bet there was much discussion by Edsel and Henry back in the day on both. I think it worked...most folks (at least today) don't even know there was a 1903 Model A Ford.

Brent, thanks for the kind words too. I miss some of the old crew at the MTFCI. Lately I've bee doing more work on my Model As than my Ts.

R/Mark
markwill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2015, 12:10 AM   #14
colin1928
Senior Member
 
colin1928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Australa Melbourne
Posts: 878
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

They have always been called Tourers around my area and for years I wonder what a Phaeton was and what was the difference
On my 1st visit to the USA found that they were the same car
colin1928 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2015, 12:13 AM   #15
Mike V. Florida
Senior Member
 
Mike V. Florida's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 14,054
Send a message via AIM to Mike V. Florida
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall V. Daut View Post
It's commonly accepted that the Model "A" was evolutionary, not revolutionary. Nothing on the 1928 Model "A" was new, only "lifted" or altered from other cars already on the road. Run down the list of items stressed in Ford's sales promotion about the Model "A" (shock absorbers, three-speed transmission, safety glass windshield, single coil ignition, four-wheel brakes, etc.) and each one can be found in competitors' cars pre-dating the Model "A", sometimes by a decade or more. That does not take away from the Model "A" just because it was not revolutionary. Very few cars for the masses are revolutionary, other than perhaps the "Model T" (which was really a further refinement of the previous Models N, R and S). I consider using the best designs available at the time in the construction of the new Model "A" to be a wise application of the old adage not to reinvent the wheel. Why not use what had proven itself to be a good design?
While it was not revolutionary for the automobile industry, it was for the Ford company.
__________________
What's right about America is that although we have a mess of problems, we have great capacity - intellect and resources - to do some thing about them. - Henry Ford II
Mike V. Florida is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2015, 04:24 AM   #16
john charlton
Senior Member
 
john charlton's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,304
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

I fitted a 1928 pheaton body to a car when the original van body was way beyond repair . I had to notify the UK DVLA (DMV) that the body change had been made . I sent in pics etc etc and advised I had fitted a Ford pheaton body . When the ammended title came back it was recorded as a tourer . So it looks like in the UK a pheaton is still a tourer !!!

John still in winter rain Suffolk County England
john charlton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2015, 07:30 AM   #17
C26Pinelake
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Michigan / Ontario border, Sarnia, Ontario. 50 miles from Detroit and 150 from Toronto.
Posts: 5,800
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by DougVieyra View Post
The answers above indicate a good grasp of why the Ford Motor Company (specifically Edsel Ford) made the name change from Touring to Phaeton. It is reflected in the song that was popular at the time of the introduction of the NEW FORD : "Henry's Made A Lady Out of Lizzie".

The grand marques of the day - Lincoln, Packard, Cunningham, and the like, never had a two seat (or 3 with jump seats) open car with such a lowly (think Chevy, Ford, Dort, Dodge, Velie, etc.) moniker as 'Touring'. While the term 'Touring' was often seen in the teens & twenties, by the 1930's, the high-buck marques had all went to the more genteel and aristocratic "Phaeton". Ford was just joining the parade. Remember, by the time the NEW FORD came on the scene, the Ford Motor Company also had had the LINCOLN MOTOR CAR COMPANY (bought at Edsel's urging), for a good number of years.

Edsel was instrumental in working to bring the NEW FORD in line with the more prestigious Lincoln of the Ford line. In fact the NEW FORD (Model A) was often called 'The Baby Lincoln". As President of the Lincoln Motor Car Company Edsel brought a number of Lincoln elements to his development of the Ford Model A of 1928. Some did not work out (the multiple disc clutch), others did quite well. The name 'Phaeton' was one of many tactics to help the NEW FORD gain increased respect and 'panache'.

And I think he succeeded.

*P.S. - With my past ownership of several marques of the teens & '20's, I felt a kinship to the term "Touring", and had my Calif. DMV registration indicate that my 1928 Ford was a 'Touring'. That was over 50 years ago. And today, I still enjoy that it is registered as a 'Touring'.

- Doug Vieyra, Eureka, CAlif
[B]What Doug says makes good sense to me. Wayne/B]
C26Pinelake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 07:08 AM   #18
updraught
Senior Member
 
updraught's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,966
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

Came across this British advert for the "New Ford Tourer":

updraught is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 07:35 AM   #19
jimalabam
Senior Member
 
jimalabam's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lee County Alabama
Posts: 828
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

Question one and two possibly attributed to Edsel. (1) entirely New Ford, (2) yes, Phaeton does speak of a FANCIER style of vehicle. Yup, my rwo cents worth...
jimalabam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2016, 12:19 AM   #20
Dave Mellor NJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 761
Default Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueSunoco View Post
The introduction of the V-8 killed the alphabetical model designation. Good thing otherwise where would we be today? Would a new Ford Mustang be, by now, the Model C 'cubed' or 'sub-three'?? Sounds pretty exciting only a 'Ford GT' can pull off the letter thing with any value, and or the GT40
How about "XL"?
Dave Mellor NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.