|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-12-2015, 04:05 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 16
|
Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
I've been a model T guy for 25 years and served as the President to the Model T Ford Club International, and in all those years the four seat open model T car was always called the Touring by Ford. However, when the second model A (yes, that's another mystery) came out in 1928 they called the four seat open car a Phaeton. The word Phaeton had been around since the curved dash cars prior to the advent of the model T in 1909, but Ford never used this word, as far as I know, during manufacturing of the model T.
Thus, does anyone know why Ford started using the older word, Phaeton, when the 1928 Ford was introduced? I still have't found the answer as to why Ford went back to the top of the alphabet, A, with the release of the 1928 Ford either when clearly there was a Model A Ford built and sold in 1903. Mark |
01-12-2015, 04:46 AM | #2 | |
Senior Member
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
Quote:
My guess in the touring/phaeton question, is that Henry wanted to distance the new A from the old T and was looking for a classier name for the car hence Phaeton.
__________________
What's right about America is that although we have a mess of problems, we have great capacity - intellect and resources - to do some thing about them. - Henry Ford II |
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
01-12-2015, 07:06 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,170
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
Also, most of us Aussies call the phaeton a tourer.
|
01-12-2015, 07:11 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 476
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
I suspect Edsel picked the name.
|
01-12-2015, 07:36 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Posts: 11,485
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
Hey Mr. Williams, great to see you here, ...and enjoyed sitting under your presidency!
I have one thought to add to your question, ...why didn't Ford call the 'A' Roadster a Runabout? Adding to that, he used the term Roadster on the 'T' in the early portion but later versions were named Runabouts. While other's comments above are clearly plausible, I suspect we need to understand how two different men named Ford was involved. Defining each individual's exact duties regarding the Model-A will likely never be known. I suspect the naming fits into that category. |
01-12-2015, 10:48 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 2,083
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Going back in Ford history to the letter "A" for the new model in 1928 (late 1927) has always been explained and accepted as gospel in response to the car being so radically different from the Model "T" that it was like starting all over again from the beginning of the alphabet. I have never been totally convinced this is the real reason. Consider the semantics and "sound" of applying the remainder of the alphabet following the letter "T". Can you imagine trying to sell the public on a car called the "Model U" or "Model V" or even "Model W"? Calling it the "Model X" would have resulted in choruses of derisive laughter as a mystery car and would have left itself wide open for a self-sustaining joke machine, as would calling it the "Model Y". Can't you just see the wags saying: "Y did you buy a Model "Y" Ford"? or disgruntled customers asking "Y did I buy a Model "Y"?" Finally, marketing a "Model Z" Ford would have been a company advertising department's worst nightmare. I realize that some foreign markets used oddball letters for their version of Fords, but these were always considered secondary markets. (My apologies to our foreign Model "A" owners for that statement, but it's true. ) So, what was left but to go back to a letter that few people would remember from a quarter century prior: "Model "A"". It even sounds pleasing and is marketable, as the letter "A" always has been. As far as I can tell, it was Floyd Clymer, who claimed in one of his 1950's books about the Model "A" Ford that the reason for choosing the letter "A" designation was because the new Ford was so revolutionary - which it patently was NOT. Old Floyd stepped on his own anatomy many times in his statements that proved to be incorrect. I believe this was another one of his SWAGs that sounds plausible on the surface. Can anyone furnish documented evidence that Ford went back to the letter "A" because its car was so revolutionary? If so, I stand corrected. But I'm guessing the company management just went along with this idea suggested by the advertising and/or marketing department. Marshall |
01-12-2015, 11:13 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Malvern, PA
Posts: 361
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
I think the answer to all these questions, as Marshall has suggested, has more to do with marketing than anything else. Ford was locked in a competitive struggle with GM and even Henry had to acquiese to Edsel to the need to compete - even to build what became the Model A. Its always important to remember that companies don't make decisions, people make decisions. If a decision doesn't make market sense, you have to start looking for personal emotional rationales. The decision to rename body types may be a little of both. Edsel was know to be enamoured of European styles, and that combined with the marketing need to distance Ford from the Model T somewhat could have combined to result in the mix of names.
__________________
Wayne @ Barb Malvern '19 T Speedster '26 T Touring '29 A Roadster '30 AA Stakebed '30 A Pickup '30 A Town Sedan '31 A Station Wagon '38 Columbia Girls bike (WWII) '40 Elgin Boys bike (WWII) '42 Super Deluxe Tudor '42 Willys MB Jeep '43 Willys MBT Trailer '43 M3A4 Hand Cart '43 Harley Davidson 42WLA with sidecar |
01-12-2015, 08:26 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Eureka, California
Posts: 1,716
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
The answers above indicate a good grasp of why the Ford Motor Company (specifically Edsel Ford) made the name change from Touring to Phaeton. It is reflected in the song that was popular at the time of the introduction of the NEW FORD : "Henry's Made A Lady Out of Lizzie".
The grand marques of the day - Lincoln, Packard, Cunningham, and the like, never had a two seat (or 3 with jump seats) open car with such a lowly (think Chevy, Ford, Dort, Dodge, Velie, etc.) moniker as 'Touring'. While the term 'Touring' was often seen in the teens & twenties, by the 1930's, the high-buck marques had all went to the more genteel and aristocratic "Phaeton". Ford was just joining the parade. Remember, by the time the NEW FORD came on the scene, the Ford Motor Company also had had the LINCOLN MOTOR CAR COMPANY (bought at Edsel's urging), for a good number of years. Edsel was instrumental in working to bring the NEW FORD in line with the more prestigious Lincoln of the Ford line. In fact the NEW FORD (Model A) was often called 'The Baby Lincoln". As President of the Lincoln Motor Car Company Edsel brought a number of Lincoln elements to his development of the Ford Model A of 1928. Some did not work out (the multiple disc clutch), others did quite well. The name 'Phaeton' was one of many tactics to help the NEW FORD gain increased respect and 'panache'. And I think he succeeded. *P.S. - With my past ownership of several marques of the teens & '20's, I felt a kinship to the term "Touring", and had my Calif. DMV registration indicate that my 1928 Ford was a 'Touring'. That was over 50 years ago. And today, I still enjoy that it is registered as a 'Touring'. - Doug Vieyra, Eureka, CAlif Last edited by DougVieyra; 01-12-2015 at 08:33 PM. |
01-12-2015, 08:48 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Elgin Illinois
Posts: 735
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
I agree, The word Phaeton just conjures up the thought of a fancier automobile!
|
01-12-2015, 09:24 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ridgefield, Ct
Posts: 3,439
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
There were horse drawn Phaetons, and bicycles called Roadsters, so the term sure wasn't "modern" in 1928. Bob
__________________
They don't have to run to be enjoyed. I'm here to enjoy the hobby, and enjoy the cars no matter what they look like. Most of the worlds problems are electrical. |
01-12-2015, 10:14 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Windy City
Posts: 937
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
The introduction of the V-8 killed the alphabetical model designation. Good thing otherwise where would we be today? Would a new Ford Mustang be, by now, the Model C 'cubed' or 'sub-three'?? Sounds pretty exciting only a 'Ford GT' can pull off the letter thing with any value, and or the GT40
|
01-12-2015, 10:15 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,099
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
Worth considering
------------------------------------------------------------------------
__________________
http://www.abarnyard.com/ |
01-12-2015, 11:54 PM | #13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 16
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
Great insight by all, thank you for the wonderful responses. I'm sure marketing had something to do with it, but I bet there was much discussion by Edsel and Henry back in the day on both. I think it worked...most folks (at least today) don't even know there was a 1903 Model A Ford.
Brent, thanks for the kind words too. I miss some of the old crew at the MTFCI. Lately I've bee doing more work on my Model As than my Ts. R/Mark |
01-13-2015, 12:10 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Australa Melbourne
Posts: 878
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
They have always been called Tourers around my area and for years I wonder what a Phaeton was and what was the difference
On my 1st visit to the USA found that they were the same car |
01-13-2015, 12:13 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
Quote:
__________________
What's right about America is that although we have a mess of problems, we have great capacity - intellect and resources - to do some thing about them. - Henry Ford II |
|
01-13-2015, 04:24 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,304
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
I fitted a 1928 pheaton body to a car when the original van body was way beyond repair . I had to notify the UK DVLA (DMV) that the body change had been made . I sent in pics etc etc and advised I had fitted a Ford pheaton body . When the ammended title came back it was recorded as a tourer . So it looks like in the UK a pheaton is still a tourer !!!
John still in winter rain Suffolk County England |
01-13-2015, 07:30 AM | #17 | |
BANNED
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Michigan / Ontario border, Sarnia, Ontario. 50 miles from Detroit and 150 from Toronto.
Posts: 5,800
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
Quote:
|
|
05-15-2016, 07:08 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,966
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
Came across this British advert for the "New Ford Tourer":
|
05-15-2016, 07:35 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lee County Alabama
Posts: 828
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
Question one and two possibly attributed to Edsel. (1) entirely New Ford, (2) yes, Phaeton does speak of a FANCIER style of vehicle. Yup, my rwo cents worth...
|
05-16-2016, 12:19 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 761
|
Re: Phaeton vs. Touring with the 1928 Ford
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|