|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-05-2010, 09:19 AM | #21 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Eureka, CA
Posts: 24
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
you're absolutley right ..... I fell into the same trap of loose technical language that I criticize my students for! There is no such force as suction. The flow is driven by atmospheric pressure in the headspace of the upper tank seeking to fill the void created by the water pump impeller blades expelling water radially out from the channels. This differential drives the flow. My concern is that since the upper bound of the pressure differential (we call it "delta P") cannot be higher than what it takes to lift the flow to the upper tank (about a foot I think), the lower limit will be sub-atmospheric and that can lead to cavitation. But from what I have read in past postings, apparently that is not an issue in the Model A system.
|
08-05-2010, 11:36 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auburn, MA
Posts: 2,106
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
Even though there is no pressure pumping water into the top tank increases the pressure at the bottom of the inlet. The interesting thing is that as this discussion goes on we are becoming aware of all the dynamics going on in the cooling system. Regardless of whether the pump sucks or blows the important thing is it is doing its job. I personally think a thermostat will help the engine reach its operating temperature quicker and also maintain it in colder weather. This is important to drive any water vapor out of the oil.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
08-05-2010, 11:57 AM | #23 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
I run an extreme heavy duty radiator that the local shop built and on my fully pressurized engine with a sealed bearing waterpump and a 6 bladed plastic fan, the engine never got over 110 degrees even on the hottest days as measured from temp guage installed in the water neck on the head. Too cool for best engine performance. I added a 160 degree thermostat and drilled out the 1/8th hole to 3/16th and added an additional hole for more flow while the thermostat was in the closed position. The engine runs about 160-170 under most conditions and even with the large 1930 california plate in the original position while climbing hills in Yosemite where the temp was over 100 degrees, the engine never went over 195 even on the longest climbs. I have only had to add 1/2 cup water at the most during the worst conditions.
|
08-05-2010, 12:55 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northeast Penna
Posts: 2,108
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
Quote:
But folks have been talking about "suction", "vacuum", etc for several centuries... clinically correct or not, it seems to get the point across. |
|
08-05-2010, 01:52 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South California
Posts: 6,188
|
Re: Data In Mountains
Quote:
Thanks for the stats! Your stats prove, again, WHY the use of a t stat is good for an internal combustion engine:i.e.-quick engine warm up and maintenance of maximised engine temp equals= effiency, longevity,best gas mileage , cleanliness internally , discourage acid/waste build..on/on! Hmm, wonder if any modern engine engineer would recommend running an engine without a thermstat? If you really don't think and/or care about any of these benefits, that's 'cool' too. Just get in and drive it and have fun ..till you wear it out!! |
|
08-05-2010, 09:52 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 351
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
You're exactly correct! People have an immediate connotation or thought in their minds when they hear the words suction or vacuum. "Mr. Grocery Boy is this food vacuum-packed?" "Well no, the atmosphere is pushing down on it" "What?? Well I don't know if I want it now, smart aleck. Let me speak to the manager!" Of course if the lid were opened the air would rush in. I remember watching a demonstration put on by an engineering prof. one time with an empty steel drum. The prof had a VACUUM pump hooked to it and when it SUCKED a VACUUM the steel drum caved in like a crushed beer can. The prof. asked, "Did the VACUUM SUCK the drum in or did the weight of the atmosphere push it in?" One student yelled out, "You suck!" The prof. didn't quite hear correctly and said, "Wrong! .... the weight of the atmosphere pushed it in." The students roared with laughter. The prof. looked puzzled. Now switching gears a little ..... The Model T cooling system works on the principle of thermo-syphon with NO water pump. The water gets hot and rises, moves forward up the head's water hump and the thermo-syphon action begins. The Model A works the same way except it is assisted by the pump to move the water. My contention is that the weight of the atmosphere in the headspace of the upper tank plays a minimal role and hot water is constantly rising up and moving forward behind the water pump in the head with a fresh supply to be caught by the impeller blades and then moved up the hose plus naturally rising and moving that direction from being hot. Once in the radiator the water cools, gravity assists and the weight of the water volume pushes down in addition to a natural draw or suction at the block entrance. I'll bet that if the water stayed cold and the pump turned, the pump would soon cavitate or the flow would be very poor at best. Larry B. Last edited by Larry Brumfield; 08-06-2010 at 07:41 PM. |
|
08-06-2010, 04:36 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Queens, NYC
Posts: 212
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
Wow, these post are great! Copying the thread to add to my A tech binder.
Running Purple Ice 2 to keep temps low, maybe not such a good idea if not in the 160 range. Installing a temp guage to monitor engine, particularly on warm up. Last edited by cars56; 08-06-2010 at 04:47 AM. |
08-06-2010, 12:10 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Owen Sound Ont. Canada
Posts: 198
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
Marc yes it did have a thermostat Gord. B
|
08-06-2010, 12:28 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 8,099
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
|
08-06-2010, 01:13 PM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South California
Posts: 6,188
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
Quote:
|
|
08-06-2010, 01:41 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northeast Penna
Posts: 2,108
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
For what it's worth, when I did my little petcock experiment described in post #13 ( engine running at fast idle ), the engine / cooling system were dead cold, so I don't think thermo-syphon was entering into the picture in this particular instance.
|
08-06-2010, 02:51 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 351
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
Quote:
Try the experiment again except this time make sure the water level is well below the overflow tube opening. Larry B. Last edited by Larry Brumfield; 08-06-2010 at 03:27 PM. |
|
08-06-2010, 03:31 PM | #33 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: St. Helens, OR
Posts: 35
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
Y'all are gonna make me break out my transport book and model it arent you? LOL...The model is actually not that hard to setup...you can use a 2-D heat transfer model/mass balance using cylindrical coordinates...If I had access to Fluient i would model it up really quick in 3-d...but i dont.
Cooling rates and thus steady state temperatures, are going to be driven by (assuming : 1) air flow speeds over the radiator surface. 2) the radiator surface area (including fins) 3) Water pump rate (mass flow rate) (dont care if you call it suction or pressure...flow is driving by a pressure differential from the pump and to a lessor degree the thermal diffusion and density gradiants...) 4) AIr temperature (needed for the driving force for thermal conductivity) 5) Water temperature 6) Water thermal conductivity with antifreeze.
__________________
1928 Model A Roadster Pickup (Sept 28) Single Family owner |
08-06-2010, 03:41 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 351
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
Here's what Ford's original Model A Instruction Book says that came with the car. You know .... it's the one that none of you read.
Page 19 The Ford Cooling System Cooling the Engine The Ford engine is cooled by a circulation of water through the water jackets which surround the cylinders, combustion chamber and valve seats. The water is CIRCULATED by THERMO-SYPHON action, the flow of water being accelerated by means of a centrifugal water pump located in the front of the cylinder head. This pump DRAWS the heated water from the engine into the upper radiator tank where it is cooled by filtering through the radiator tubes to the lower tank. Larry B. Last edited by Larry Brumfield; 08-06-2010 at 03:53 PM. |
08-06-2010, 05:21 PM | #35 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Eureka, CA
Posts: 24
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
Hi PDXCougfan ...
I'm thinking of modeling it with GT Cool (part of GT ISE suite of programs), but first I want to get my GT Power engine model up & running. I'm sure I'll be pestering the folks on this site for info like cam lift tables etc. I think we have Fluent, but I've never used it. Ken |
08-06-2010, 05:43 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 1,128
|
Re: Thermostat data, not opinions
"Here's what Ford's original Model A Instruction Book says that came with the car. You know .... it's the one that none of you read."
Read mine before I drove it anywhere. Marc |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|