|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-25-2010, 12:35 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 1,128
|
Brumfield Swirl
Larry and Others....
Could you clarify the comments about the design of the Brumfield head with regard to the "swirling" action to make the mixture burn better ? I'm wondering if this method is used today, or if it's unique to the Brumfield design. Also, I thought that the original Model A combustion chamber used a unique design to help the combustion process. Marc |
07-25-2010, 01:12 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 351
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
Turbulence and air flow is nothing new. What makes the difference is how the designer makes use of it.
Larry B. |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
07-25-2010, 02:17 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 1,128
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
Larry,
Is this method used today on engines ? Marc |
07-25-2010, 03:35 PM | #4 |
BANNED
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 11,454
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
remember these maybe one can be adapted to the model A. lol
a selling feature for the 1984 ford tempo was it came with a 2.3L HSC. (high swirl combustion). TORNADO is a non-moving turbine shaped device, which creates a vortex or swirling effect to the engine. The result is improved airflow into the engine combustion chamber, causing a more efficient mixture between air and fuel. |
07-25-2010, 05:13 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 222
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
Mitch is right about high swirl technology beginning in the mid-80s. All the designs I've seen create the swirling action at the runner/port or in the combustion chamber (as Larry's). IMHO, upstream swirl (the Tornado) would be ineffective because of the turns and bends in a factory intake manifold, particularly on carbureted engines where fuel and air (albeit vapor) are coming down the pipe. I think it would just create turbulence while good swirl design creates a very controlled mixing action. Swirl is used extensively in diesel engines because they burn fuel droplets, not vapor. While it helps get to more complete combustion, you can bet the OEMs used it to reduce hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions so their numbers looked good on the window sticker. $0.02.
|
07-25-2010, 05:45 PM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Eureka, CA
Posts: 24
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
We never tested a flat head combustion chamber where I worked, so I don't know if you can successfully implement good air motion with valve-in-block geometries. Seems like it would be harder to do. Larry B., your experience? |
07-25-2010, 07:52 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 1,128
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
So....the use of a swirling motion was started in the 1980's then.
I can see where it helps with diesel fuel, but shouldn't the gas be totally vaporized ? Marc |
07-25-2010, 09:54 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 222
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
Keep in mind that during the '80s, fuel injection, particularly, port FI was beginning to take hold and being used on quite a few engines. This allowed the designers to make manifolds that carried only air; the fuel being injected at the port and aimed at the valve area (krswen might add more detail). It's my understanding that swirl was introduced at the port area because that's where the air and fuel are mixed, unlike carbureted engines where at all happens upstream. I believe it actually helps to make the fuel and air into a more homogeneous mixture and aids vaporization. And, of course, reduces emissions. I've seen racing heads with welded and ground cross-hatching in the combustion chamber to try and induce a turbulent condition (swirl?) to aid combustion. Then again, I've seen a lot of weird things on race cars.
|
07-25-2010, 10:31 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,471
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
I believe the stock heads my 92 chevy c2500HD had on its TBI 350 had some kinda swirls on the intake ports.
|
07-26-2010, 06:28 AM | #10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Eureka, CA
Posts: 24
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
You want the microturbulence in the mixture in the cylinder, not the port, although it is largely achieved through port geometry. The intake valve has already closed. The reason is as follows: once a flame kernal has been established at the spark plug it expands outward as a hollow sphere. The more wrinkled the surface (like a golf ball) the faster the combustion, which is desirable. Swirl and tumble breaking down to microturbulence does this.
|
07-26-2010, 07:05 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,471
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
am I the only one that thinks the "tornado" does nothing more then restrict air and cost a ridicules amount of money?
Although not combustion chamber related perhaps krswen has an opinion\knowledge about it? |
07-26-2010, 07:25 AM | #12 |
BANNED
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 11,454
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
just a note to my previous post the 1984 2.3 hsc was carbureted in 1985 it was fuel injected cfi. i believe the swirling was acheived more from the combustion chamber design than the runners.
|
07-26-2010, 10:39 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 8,099
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
Nothing new about swirl or heart shaped combustion chambers. Brumfield didn't design either.
|
07-26-2010, 01:07 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Casselberry, FL
Posts: 188
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
Heads today are much better with this. The TBI heads like yours and my 92 silverado are ok heads (which might be a generous statement for the tbi heads) but the newer vortec heads that chevy makes are much better. Seems like swirling in a model a would be much more difficult.
|
07-26-2010, 01:21 PM | #15 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
I think the question may well have been about the type of swirl/turbulence caused in the chamber by tight clearance ("squish area") between piston top and part of the chamber. Studied and developed by Harry Ricardo circa WWI.
|
07-26-2010, 01:50 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 1,128
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
Bruce,
Yes indeed. How different is this early, Model A technology, from that in the Brumfield or other modern designs ? Marc |
07-26-2010, 04:37 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 351
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
|
07-26-2010, 05:11 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Casselberry, FL
Posts: 188
|
Re: Brumfield Swirl
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|