|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-31-2023, 12:21 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 50
|
Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
Is that big inline 6 300 too large to put into a shoebox? I did originally intend to rebuild my 8ba but the power and parts availability for the 300 is very appealing. Opinions are very appreciated.
|
12-31-2023, 12:30 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
I remember seeing several threads about this on the H.A.M.B. You really should be asking over there, because that's what they do. From everything I've read, although you can put anything in anything with enough effort, the 300 is much too long to be practical in a Shoebox. Too bad, because they are good engines.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
12-31-2023, 12:49 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: sw minnesota
Posts: 4,598
|
Re: Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
Totally agree with tubman, the 300 is a good motor. I've done all kinds of swaps in irrelevant machines, but after you make all the adaptions to make it work its not really a 49 Ford any more. There are circumstances where it doesn't matter, but if you have a nice original car why not fix the 8ba?
|
12-31-2023, 12:56 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 50
|
Re: Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
Well the car isn't a very nice example of a shoebox and I do have a torn apart 8ba. I've been working on another car and have shelved the Tudor for the time being. Guess Im looking for a quick fix to get the car running, its been parked for the last 2.5 years...and Im always looking for something a little different.
|
12-31-2023, 07:58 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,675
|
Re: Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
If you want help putting the 8BA back together we are the right place.
As Tubman said, if you are looking for advice on how to cut up a firewall to fit a 300 six, the HAMB is a much the place for that. |
12-31-2023, 08:55 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,174
|
Re: Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quickest, easiest & cheapest fix is a SBC. Nothing fits a shoebox better than an 8BA except a SBC. |
12-31-2023, 12:55 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: NE Iowa
Posts: 1,668
|
Re: Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
I wish I could find that April fools' spoof from the past. It described how GM had designed the small block to mirror the Ford flathead, from the cylinder offset to the engine mounts, oil pan sumps etc. It was a good entertaining read.
|
12-31-2023, 01:01 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,517
|
Re: Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
For six cylinder stuff- The international Inliners Club. There is a 254" truck flathead engine-49-51 and hard to find, but worth it. Newc
Last edited by Newc; 12-31-2023 at 10:32 PM. |
12-31-2023, 09:10 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Orcas Island Washington
Posts: 5,066
|
Re: Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
There's also an inline ford site. I think I joined a while back. The 300 is a heck of an engine, but I gotta say I drove my H flathead six about 50 miles this afternoon and it's a damn Swiss watch and I made a point of not downshifting on any of the major hills. They come up on CL when people want a FH V8. Yes, big parts aren't readibly available but the tune up stuff sure is. They are not a real flashy powerplant but like my Favorite american watch, they take a lickin' and keep on tickin'. It's ford, It's period correct, it's a bolt in. Or just plain ressurect that 8ba........
__________________
Owner/Operator of 'Jailbar Ranch' on the side of Mt. Pickett. Current stable consists of 1946 1/2 ton pickup turned woodie wagon with FH V8, 1946 Tonner Pickup with 226 H six, 1979 Toyota landcruiser wagon, now wearing 1947 Ford Jailbar sheet metal. 'Rusty ol' floorboards, hot on their feet' (Alan Jackson) |
01-01-2024, 01:43 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 50
|
Re: Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
Unfortunately I just missed out on a 226 Inline 6 flathead for $700 with the trans. Appeared to be a very nice looking setup. I'll keep my eyes open...
|
01-01-2024, 01:52 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Orcas Island Washington
Posts: 5,066
|
Re: Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
Make sure it's an H model, not the G with the front distributor. More parts availability and correct for your shoebox.
__________________
Owner/Operator of 'Jailbar Ranch' on the side of Mt. Pickett. Current stable consists of 1946 1/2 ton pickup turned woodie wagon with FH V8, 1946 Tonner Pickup with 226 H six, 1979 Toyota landcruiser wagon, now wearing 1947 Ford Jailbar sheet metal. 'Rusty ol' floorboards, hot on their feet' (Alan Jackson) |
01-01-2024, 02:59 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 50
|
Re: Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
Thanks for the heads up.
|
01-01-2024, 06:37 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 2,464
|
Re: Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
The quick/fast fix for a Shoe Box Ford in the mid to late '50's was a Cad V8.. Ergo the FORD-A-Lac was born.. The early Cad OHV engines were about the same size as the SBC. The cars that had Cad engines in the mid/late '50's always gathered up a large crowd at the BOB'S BIG BOY Drive-Ins in Burbank, Van Nuy's,etc.
__________________
Bill.... 36 5 win cpe |
01-02-2024, 10:03 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 902
|
Re: Thoughts on 300 inline 6 in 49 Tudor?
What Jack said. If you want to get it on the road and drive it.
Sent you a PM
__________________
Henry Ford designed the flathead without the aid of a computer. |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|